During the past year, three MSNBC commentators have been suspended,
reprimanded, fired, or forced to apologize for their sexist and/or racist
comments. Rather than address these problems by proactively moving to make
certain they do not happen in the first place, MSNBC has instead decided to use these controversies as part of an
advertising campaign to promote its political coverage.
That's right -- MSNBC has turned the recent mea culpa by Hardball host Chris Matthews for his
sexist comments into an advertising campaign, using clips of his statement to
push MSNBC programming. Left on the cutting room floor, of course, are the
portions in which Matthews acknowledged having been "callous,"
"nasty," and "dismissive" toward Sen. Hillary Clinton.
The pattern of sexism at MSNBC doesn't stop there. Last year
MSNBC canceled its simulcast of host Don Imus' show for his racist and
sexist comments targeting the Rutgers women's
basketball players. It was only after a widespread outcry by individuals,
employees of the network, and many organizations, including Media Matters, that the network took
action. At the time, NBC News President Steve Capus promised to "continue
the dialogue about what is appropriate conduct and speech."
The latest example of the systemic problem of sexism and misogyny on
MSNBC's airwaves came last week from correspondent David Shuster when he
stated, while talking about Chelsea Clinton's campaign activities on
behalf of her mother, "doesn't it seem like Chelsea's sort of being
pimped out in some weird sort of way" by Sen. Clinton's presidential
campaign. Following criticism from many who found Shuster's comments
indefensible and demeaning, MSNBC suspended Shuster indefinitely and aired an
apology from him that evening.
Many know of the high-profile controversies I've noted above, but
what about the less publicized incidents of sexist and misogynistic commentary
that have gone unacknowledged and uncorrected by NBC News and MSNBC? Media Matters has documented scores of
examples. Just last year, MSNBC host Tucker Carlson said of Sen. Clinton:
"[T]here's just something about her that feels castrating, overbearing,
and scary." Further, Carlson has said of Clinton: "I have often
said, when she comes on television, I involuntarily cross my legs."
Just how seriously are these issues being taken?
With Americans going to the polls this year to select the next president
of the United States,
news organizations like NBC News and MSNBC have a sacred duty to be good
stewards of accurate, balanced, and responsible political discourse.
These controversial comments undercut the foundations of what
journalism should be. They turn political news coverage into a sideshow circus,
diverting attention from and distorting the real issues Americans face daily.
Reasonable people of every political persuasion agree, as I'm
sure you do, that sexist smears should not be a part of legitimate journalistic
coverage of the issues or candidates in any race.
It's clear the management at NBC News and MSNBC has consistently
failed to address what appears to be the core problem. Please take a moment to
sign our petition and send a message to NBC News President Capus that the time for apologies has passed. The time for a real
commitment to change is long since overdue. With your help, we can
urge MSNBC to change the demeaning tone that its coverage all too often takes
and truly address this disturbing pattern once and for all.
Thank you for your continued support.
Sincerely,
David Brock,
President & CEO
Media Matters for America
"I agree with Media Matters: NBC News President Capus, the time for apologies has passed. We call on your network to change the demeaning tone that its coverage all too often takes and truly address this disturbing pattern once and for all."
MSNBC
letters@msnbc.com MSNBC/Microsoft-NBC
30 Rockefeller Plz
3rd Fl
New York, NY
10112
(212) 664-4444
When contacting the media, please be polite and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and be sure to indicate exactly what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.