The Strib and Al Franken, cont'd
November 07, 2008 1:43 pm ET by Eric Boehlert
We've been raising questions about the hometown Minneapolis Star Tribune's coverage of the Franken/Coleman race, and today we have another.
The two are locked in what could be, statistically based on the total number of votes cast, the closest U.S. senate race in history. A recount is underway. And it's a recount required by state law, because the vote was so close. In fact, Coleman's original margin of victory, 725 votes (out of 2.9 million cast), has already shrunk to 236 votes.
So why this Strib headline today [emphasis added]? "Sen. Norm Coleman's Democratic challenger is vowing to push ahead with a recount".
Why the "vowing" language, which makes it seem like Franken's just being a sore loser? Under Minnesota law, recounts are required if the final margin of victory is less than one-half of 1 percent. In the case of Franken/Coleman, the margin's .01 percent. So of course there's going to be a recount.
Also under state law, the person trailing can request that the recount not go forward. But considering there's already been a 500 vote shift in the process, naturally Franken's not going to do that.
Seems to us that once again, the Strib has its thumb on the scale while covering this race.


















It's really not hard to understand at all. The Strib hasn't been able to fire ALL their competent reporters, but their editing staff has been totally flipped and folks like D.J. Tice routinely stick heds on stories that match up worse than Ray Milland and Rosie Grier sharing the same body.
It's now so bad I refuse to link to the Strib, which is hard to do when you live in Minnesota and blog about local politics.
The Strib's been this way for a long long time. I remember some incredibly slanted headlines from the Clinton impeachment days.
I wouldn't be at all surprised to find that through all the changes in ownership at the Star-Tribune these last twenty years that the same right-wing jerk of a copy editor/headline writer has remained employed.
Aside from the recent somewhat mild criticism of the GOP VP nominee by Will, the rest of these writers have been concocting the kind of drivel the old paper would not have been swayed to publish without some kind of editorial rebuttal of some kind at least in terms of if not an opposing viewpoint then an alternative one. It is strange to hear that they decreed a moratorium on "opinion" in the weeks prior to the election because their had been an onslaught of deplorable articles by the likes of Krauthammer and Crystal questioning the efficacy of Obama's candidacy. The most egergious was a Krauthammer article regarding Obama's overseas jaunt, (obviously used to shore up his cred as a world leader), in which he argued that Obama had no right to speak in Berlin because he "hadn't earned it", an arguement seething with racial bias beneath the surface. Even though the Strib reluctantly seemed to have endorsed Obama for president, (waiting until a week before the election when by all accounts it was in the bag and the McCain / Palin Campaign was drowning in a sea of it's own ineptitude), there is still the appearance of disgusting editorials like today's by Clifford May where 4 days after the election, he is still trumping up the "insidious connections" between the president elect and a host of discredited "associations" ranging from Louis Farrakhan and Rashid Khalidi. Of course William Ayers was present as well. In better times the paper in question would have resisted printing such garbage on the heels of an important election. The lack of any kind of rebuke for the recent Michelle Bachmann fiasco was enough for me and my wife to finally cancel our subscription. I suggest all others who have the same qualms about the drift of the Strib to do the same. The change in the paper seems to have coincided with the 2008 election and the RNC convention in St. Paul and appears to be part of an overt strategy to flip a heretofore DFL state, (something I heard quite alot about when canvassing for Obama). This has nothing to do with freedom of Speech (a meme the conservatives LOVE to drag out whenever they are criticized), and everything to do with accountability and integrity of the press.
Katherine Kersten has been a columnist for the Star Tribune for many years. She's been completely nuts for all of them, but she has been there for a whole bunch of them, already.
I don't think it's the new owners at all. The paper has been trash since the Cowles' family sold it, which was at least 15 years ago. I haven't subscribed since about '98, when Lou Gelfand told me it was perfectly journalistically appropriate for a news article to refer to President Clinton's attorney as his "mouthpiece". (And whatever you do, don't get me started on Lou Gelfand).
At root, the problem is that the people running the paper don't give a fig, or know anything about, news at all, and when they must, their preference is for conservative happy speak. A problem not confined to the Strib of course, but oh, how the mighty have fallen!