Reading Nancy Pelosi's supposedly racist mind
February 02, 2009 12:50 pm ET by Eric Boehlert
Conservative columnist Ruben Navarrette pulls a neat trick over at CNN.com. Dishing out the latest, warmed-over GOP talking points about Obama's proposed stimulus package, the RNC-friendly writer claims to be able to read minds. Specifically, he can read the mind of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi who last week was at the center of a mini-controversy regarding the proposed expansion of Medicaid funding for family planning services.
Navarrette though, was able to spot very nasty, vile and racist undertones to Pelosi's comments:
When you make the argument that contraception is a cost-saving measure for state and federal government, some might think what you're implying is that the babies who would otherwise have been born were destined to become dependent on welfare and other public services. And for those who think wrongly that welfare dependents only come in two colors -- black and brown -- it's easy to see which births need to be controlled. That's how you connect the dots. Now, maybe that isn't where Pelosi was headed with her comments. It doesn't matter.
Did you follow? According to Navarrette, "some might think" that Pelosi was implying that "black and brown" babies are a bad thing. And that if you "connect the dots," that's where Pelosi's comments were "headed."
But did Pelosi ever say or even imply such a ugly thing? According to Navarrette, "It doesn't matter." He's going to smear her nonetheless.












The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles




It seems that politics is politics... Everyone seems to be shocked that someone from one party insults the other party... Grow up... it's politics... An YOU MAY NOT BE RIGHT! Democrats and Republicans are equally bipartisan... Equally!!! Not one person is innocent. Now we kiss the democrat behind... i just hope whoever is in the white house will do the best they can. But they are all politicians.
What about Mr Daeshle? He had the class to step down, and should. Again, he's a politician. They are all equally corrupt, from the top down.