About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Politico uncritically reports Huckabee's "anti-religious" nonsense on economic recovery plan

February 10, 2009 5:23 pm ET by Karl Frisch

As Washington Monthly's Steve Benen notes, former Arkansas Governor and current Fox News host Mike "Huckabee doesn’t know what he’s talking about."

Perhaps Politico should have taken that into consideration before uncritically repeating Huckabee's false claim that the economic recovery package is "anti-religious." Though the provision Huckabee cited is correct -- the bill would not provide money to be used on a religious "school or department of divinity" -- Politico did not note that, contrary to Huckabee’s suggestion that this provision is a consequence of the liberal trifecta of Pelosi-Reid-Obama, such provisions were included in bills passed when the Republicans were in the majority, as Media Matters has noted.

Benen continues:

Look, if Mike Huckabee doesn't like the stimulus bill, fine. But to tell people the legislation is "anti-religious" is just insane. Or, to put it another way, Huckabee is bearing false witness, which as he may have heard, is generally frowned upon.

Regular readers know the story by now, but if you're just joining us, this myth has been making the rounds in right-wing circles for about a week. Originally, the American Center for Law and Justice, a right-wing legal group formed by TV preacher Pat Robertson, said the stimulus bill includes a provision that would prohibit "religious groups and organizations from using" buildings on college campuses. Soon after, religious right groups and right-wing blogs were up in arms, demanding that lawmakers fix the "anti-Christian" language of the bill. Fox News and the Christian Broadcasting Network helped get the word out to the far-right base about the nefarious measure. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) actually tried to have the provision removed from the bill.

There was, however, one small problem: there was no such measure. The ACLJ doesn't know how to read legislation, and didn't realize that the standard language in the bill simply blocks spending for on-campus buildings that are used primarily for religion (like a chapel, for example). This same language has been part of education spending bills for 46 years. It's just the law, and it's never been controversial.

More on this issue: Fox promotes falsehood that provision in recovery bill would prohibit any religious activity in facilities receiving money

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mefirst (February 10, 2009 6:24 pm ET)
         
      well yeah, but you have to realize that if you are not allowing money to promote religious activities then you are "anti-christian".   just like if you do not allow organized prayer in school, you "won't let us pray in school".  no, go ahead. just don't make me participate.  bible club after school hours? knock yourself out. just not as part of academic studies.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (February 10, 2009 6:51 pm ET)
         
      Well, MMFA, that may be true ... But it sure sounds good on Politico, FNC & Limbaugh!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (February 10, 2009 10:47 pm ET)
         
      A finely honed "product" indeed. Not to my taste. I'd be astonished to find that there was any actual nutritional valve in the "product". 
      Report Abuse