About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Caught red-handed using GOP talking points, Fox caves with apology ... for typo

February 11, 2009 2:24 pm ET by Karl Frisch

Yesterday, Media Matters noted:

In purporting to "take a look back" at how the economic recovery plan "grew, and grew, and grew," Fox News' Jon Scott referenced seven dates, as on-screen graphics cited various news sources from those time periods -- all of which came directly from a Senate Republican Communications Center press release. A Fox News on-screen graphic even reproduced a typo contained in the Republican press release.

My, how a day of criticism from media critics and progressive bloggers changes things – even at Fox News. Today, Scott offered... an apology of sorts (emphasis added):

Yesterday on Happening Now we showed you how the stimulus bill has grown over time. Our story prompted by a news release from the Senate Republican Communication Center. There point that a $56 billion proposal in September has grown to $838 billion in five months. In compiling the story, our producers and researchers did what we always do -- we verified the accuracy of the material. But in double checking the newspaper quotes referenced in that news release we made the same mistake they did. We labeled a Wall Street Journal article as having run in 2009 when in fact it was 2008. That was our error, and we apologize.

Of course, I’m kidding.

See what Scott does there? He apologizes, not for passing along a one-sided argument made in a Senate Republican Communications Center’s press release as Fox News’ original reporting, but for reporting the typo.

In his initial report, Scott didn’t tell his audience that the citations in his report were based entirely on a press release from the Senate Republicans – a fact he glosses over in his half-hearted apology for the typo.

I’d question Fox News’ journalistic integrity; that is of course if they had any to question in the first place.

INITIAL VIDEO

FOLLOW-UP VIDEO

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by walstib (February 11, 2009 3:20 pm ET)
         

      "There point..."

       

      C'mon guys!!  Please tell me that's another FOCKS error.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Gabe ORielly (February 11, 2009 4:50 pm ET)
         
      Faux News has the same relationship to genuine news as Billo's "No Spin Zone" has to the truth, or Ann(thrax) Coulter's columns have to the writings of a rational person.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by imsupermom (February 11, 2009 6:18 pm ET)
         

      Tearing down Fox News is not going to do you any good.  That is how liberal media types work, tear down the REAL news source in order to force people to listen to the liberal bias main media.  Nothing different then your run of the mill dictatorship.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jwcoop715110 (February 11, 2009 7:50 pm ET)
           
        In addition to being factually-challenged and fundamentally-dishonest, ma, you're utterly psychotic and your kids should be removed from your custody for their own protection.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by BrenMan 94 (February 11, 2009 10:47 pm ET)
             
          What an intelligent retort on your part sir.  I don't need to even get started on your party, you've summed up their idioticy already.  Thank you.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by djasper2761 (February 11, 2009 11:02 pm ET)
               
            thats right. It is ok to indoctrinate children with right wing/conservative dogma. They will grow up and reject what was taught them with a slight chip on their shoulder and forever wondering what their parents were thinking. No problem at all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (February 12, 2009 7:48 am ET)
               

            That post doesn't really merit a thoughtful response.  The idea that FOX is "the real news source" is borderline psychotic, even beside the bizarre reference to dictatorships.

            So does that post make a broad statement about your political philosophy?  We have quite a few right-wing nuts here, they don't define the Republican party any more than any individual liberal defines the Democratic party.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by friedbergboy1422 (February 12, 2009 2:20 pm ET)
               
            Please don't comment on what you cannot spell, Brenn. Thank you.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by ginamarie (February 12, 2009 11:01 am ET)
           

        Real news source?????????

        AHHAAAAAAAAHHAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

        Oh, that's so funny, it's sad.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by aayers14247 (February 11, 2009 6:56 pm ET)
         
      I don't see what the big deal is. They are the press, and they were reading a PRESS release. The only apology necessary is regarding the typo.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eecee (February 11, 2009 8:08 pm ET)
           

        The difference is they didn't present it as a press release, but passed it off as their own work.  That is not only fundamentally dishonest, it's not even ethical journalism.

        Then, instead of admitting that they broadcast the contents of the press release word for word onscreen, they scurried around it by saying their report was "prompted" by the press release, and they only made the identical typo in "double checking" the press release.  Hello, they broadcast it word for word, including the typo.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by LuvLuLu (February 11, 2009 11:50 pm ET)
             

           

          We labeled a Wall Street Journal article as having run in 2009 when in fact it was 2008. That was our error, and we apologize.

          But they didn't label the WSJ article as having run in 2009. The Republican press release mislabeled it. They're apologizing as though it were their own error. It wasn't. They did broadcast that flawed slide, but the much bigger error was to fail to label their report as propoganda from a Republican press release is a much greater sin, and they didn't acknowledge that.

          Something's rotten in Denmark when you apologize for someone else's mistake and ignore your own much larger failings.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by LuvLuLu (February 12, 2009 12:01 am ET)
               

            And here's what they said when they ran with this story, trying to pretend that they were doing the research for their viewers. (Emphasis added)

            During the February 10 edition of Fox News' Happening Now, co-host Jon Scott claimed that "the Senate is expected to pass the $838 billion stimulus plan -- its version of it, anyway. We thought we'd take a look back at the bill, how it was born, and how it grew, and grew, and grew."

            They (Fox) didn't take a look back at the bill. The Republican press release took a look back at the bill.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by achrispage6992 (February 12, 2009 7:54 am ET)
                 
              Interesting take luvlulu. I think Jason Linkins over at Huff Post already beat you to such an observation. We wouldn't be putting forths others ideas as our own would we?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Brabantio (February 12, 2009 8:22 am ET)
                   
                Right, because nobody else could possibly come to the same observation.  Is there anything in how she wrote that which indicates she lifted it from Linkins' post?
                Report Abuse
              • Author by LuvLuLu (February 12, 2009 2:47 pm ET)
                   

                I just went to the Huffington Post for the first time in my life, and I don't see any story by that man.

                It was my own idea. It was an easy conclusion to make. I don't understand what your point is, unless you just like picking on people for no good reason.

                Report Abuse
        • Author by bfarmer75 (February 12, 2009 9:49 am ET)
             
          "it's not even ethical journalism."  i pray to allah you scrutinize CBS, NBC, and MSNBC the way you're scrutinizing this story.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (February 12, 2009 10:09 am ET)
               
            If you have examples of others engaging in this sort of behavior, by all means present them.  It's not going to excuse FOX's actions anyway, so I'm not sure what you think it would accomplish.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by psmarc93 (February 12, 2009 1:22 pm ET)
               
            I don't think you're too familiar with this site. Media Matters examines MSNBC, ABC, CBS, etc. all the time to discover conservative bias in the media.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by dmathews (February 12, 2009 1:32 pm ET)
             
          Is not the headline of this article 'Caught red-handed using GOP talking points.' a bit misleading? Is not there a difference big between talking points and a press release? I would guess everyone would have access to a press release to use as they choose.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by LuvLuLu (February 12, 2009 7:58 pm ET)
               
            It is a press release full of talking points. Really now, are you telling us that you don't understand that?
            Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (February 11, 2009 9:15 pm ET)
           

        They are the press, and they were reading a PRESS release.

        No, what they did is they used this source as if it were their own. Then, they later lie about the reason for the typo, by making it seem as if they made the same mistake as the source, when in fact, they copied it verbatim.

        Even worse, the source is the kind of biased organization that FOX claims they are not reliant upon.  

        Report Abuse
      • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (February 12, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
           
        So plagiarism is perfectly okay these days?  And if so, will anyone on your side stop bashing VP Biden for it, since apparently it's now perfectly all right to plagiarize?...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Nick Lento (February 11, 2009 7:35 pm ET)
         

      The "Big Deal" here is that Fox "News" got caught being informational conveyer belts for the Republican party.

      It was so blatant that the didn't even bother to proofread the text on the charts they were, evidently, given to broadcast.

      There's nothing illegal about Fox being a PR tool of Republicans; it's when they deny that that they look stupid, at best.

      Lrt's face it, Fox is the media arm of the Republican party.......they might as well change their broadcast call letters to "WGOP TV".

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (February 11, 2009 9:16 pm ET)
           

        There's nothing illegal about Fox being a PR tool of Republicans; it's when they deny that that they look stupid, at best.

        It's worse than that. They're denying they copied the source. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by gopdude1978 (February 11, 2009 9:58 pm ET)
             
          They aren't denying anything and if you watch the clip the citations are at the bottom of each screen shot?!!? If Fox is the "media wing of the GOP" then I guess the Liberal/Left has us beat because they have the REST of the media biased for them......at least Fox reports the TRUTH...
          Report Abuse
          • Author by LuvLuLu (February 11, 2009 11:45 pm ET)
               

            The citation was not at the bottom of each screen shot. The citation that was missing was one that would have said that the data being presented was entirely from the "Senate Republican Communications Center's press release".

            Lacking that citation, they are deceiving their viewers. On purpose.

            In addition, FoxNews claimed that the wrong date was their error. It wasn't their error. Their error was in not saying who the slideshow came from. The date error was the Senate Republican Communications Center's press release's error!!!!

            Report Abuse
    • Author by jwcoop715110 (February 11, 2009 7:53 pm ET)
         
      As Murdo said,  news corpse has never been a company that tolerates facts.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by david.martin1234339 (February 11, 2009 9:21 pm ET)
         
      How BLATANTLY dishonest.

      Their story wasn't "prompted" by the Republican press release... it WAS the Republican press release with date typo included.

       

       

       

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by david.martin1234339 (February 11, 2009 9:21 pm ET)
         
      How BLATANTLY dishonest.

      Their story wasn't "prompted" by the Republican press release... it WAS the Republican press release with date typo included.

       

       

       

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by gopdude1978 (February 11, 2009 9:54 pm ET)
         
      Okay it was a GOP press release, so what?? Was it false??? Was there something misleading in there??? Nope. It is no secret that Pelosi, Reid, and Pres. Obama are out to spend as much money as possible to "save" the economy. Keynes is WRONG, spending never has, and never will work during economic downturns. What makes me angry about our government (R & D alike) is that they use our tough times to take advantage of us and work their way around the system of government that was put in place by our founding fathers. Do you realize how much CRAP is in this bill that has absolutely nothing to do with helping the average person. The problem started in the government, spread to Wall Street, got a good healthy dose of greed added to it, and now we are asking the government who started this whole mess to fix it!?!?!?!? Where is the logic in this??!?!?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by djasper2761 (February 11, 2009 11:17 pm ET)
           
        hows it going shyawn inshannity?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (February 12, 2009 7:41 am ET)
           
        Whether it's false or not isn't the point.  The point is that it's dishonest to present someone else's press release as your own research, and it underlines the impression that they are nothing more than an arm of the Republican party.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (February 12, 2009 12:55 pm ET)
           

        GOPDude,

        They are presenting a GOP Press Release as a news story.  That is wrong.  If they would have said, "According to a GOP press release..." it would have been fine.

        Would you appreciate it if one of the news stations presented, verbatim, a Democratic Press Release as "news?"

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Big Dan (February 11, 2009 11:46 pm ET)
         
      "We're sorry for copying the misspelled GOP talking points" - FOX "news"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by david.martin1234339 (February 12, 2009 12:09 am ET)
         

      I've been thinking this through and I've come to realize that Fox's "apology" is nothing but a very large FU to anyone that is not a Fox News viewer.

      I'll bet Rupert handled this one personally.

      Their core audience could really  care less if Fox News uses GOP Press Releases as their own data, really not one little bit.

      And this story will certainly not be covered in any right-wing echo chamber.

      Remember, their core audience thinks President Bush did a great job and that Sarah Palin would make a great President.

      Crazy, like a Fox.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by david.martin1234339 (February 12, 2009 12:30 am ET)
         
      I just donated $25 bucks, that should smooth things over.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by skiploader1111 (February 12, 2009 3:17 am ET)
         
      First they plagarize, then they try to cover up the plagarism by apologizing for the original source's typo.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pros2pros2940 (February 12, 2009 8:29 am ET)
         
      Fox News has won court cases whereby the judge ruled that it is OK to lie.  One was in Florida where a reporter was going to do a story about milk and some additives bad for ones health but the network killed the story and fired the reporter
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ginamarie (February 12, 2009 11:11 am ET)
         
      It's beautiful really, just lovely. Exposed in the light of day. And yet as ever arrogant as to maintain false bravado in the face of the camera. They (at Fox Republican News) so egotistically believe that all of their viewers are stupid and vapid, not to mention intellectually lazy, that anything they do will be swallowed like tonic. They do not sweat for one minute that their dumb audience will squawk with disapproval.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (February 12, 2009 4:27 pm ET)
           

        They (at Fox Republican News) so egotistically believe that all of their viewers are stupid and vapid, not to mention intellectually lazy, that anything they do will be swallowed like tonic.

        And are they wrong about that?  I wonder if Mencken's famous old quote abour no one ever going broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people is hung on Rupert's office wall...

        Report Abuse
    • Author by ginamarie (February 12, 2009 11:23 am ET)
         

      I mean just read the Fox Repulican News supporters posts here. They just don't get it; they don't see what the point is. "So what" says one, then they go on to repeat everything they have swallowed by listening to Fox. They have no clue that the issue is about the GOP feeding the Fox dogs their 'news reporting'.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by psmarc93 (February 12, 2009 1:15 pm ET)
         
      Tool of the Year award goes to Jon "Bullsh*t, Typo-free" Scott!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nativeofsf (February 12, 2009 3:36 pm ET)
         
      Another example, albeit distasteful, of “oblique hubris” yet in this case, “supercilious” coveys more…while a harbinger of retribution silently awaits.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.

Weekly Columns

Feed Icon