In an article about bipartisanship, the WashPost only quotes Republicans
February 13, 2009 9:31 am ET by Eric Boehlert
Headline: "Gregg's Withdrawal Becomes a Partisan Issue."
What do Democrats thinks of Judd Gregg's peculiar decision to belatedly walk away from an Obama cabinet post and what it means for Obama's bipartisan outreach? Readers don't know because the Post doesn't care what Democrats think. The newspaper only quotes Republicans about Gregg and the issue of partisanship.
Classic, right? And doesn't that pretty much sum up the one-sided reporting and punditry on the topic of partisanship in recent weeks?


















We have the numbers, we have the money. Why is there no organized effort for the left to purchase and merchandise a left-leaning news organization?
I'd love to invest in an organization that espouses the truth. Any supporters?