At Fox News, guilty until proven innocent
March 18, 2009 10:03 am ET by Eric Boehlert
Back on its ACORN hobby horse, Fox News attacks the community organizing group and its possible role as a national partner with the Census Bureau to recruit more than one million temporary workers to go knock on doors for the upcoming census.
Fox stresses ACORN has "a history of voter fraud charges." Actually, that's how the headline is worded. In the actual online article, Fox News insists ACORN has a "history of voter fraud." (The pesky ref to "charges" gets dropped.) But does ACORN have a history of voter fraud? An ACORN rep tells Fox the organization has never been convicted of any crime, and the Fox article doesn't produce any evidence to the contrary.
It's true Republicans, amplified by Fox News, aired endless unproven charges against the group last fall and painted the understaffed outfit as an all-powerful cabal. But there's no proof ACORN's done anything wrong. But now Fox News claims that because unproven charges have been waged in the past (amplified by Fox News), that the group is suspect.
That's a nifty Noise Machine trick.
The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
Another swing an a miss from the Adam Dunn of conservative politics.
The article shows a confession to REGISTRATION fraud, not VOTER fraud. ACORN was the VICTIM in this case, since they paid people to go out a register poepl who would then VOTE. Fraudulent registrations don't lead to votes. (Unless these people VOTED fraudulantly, how can it be VOTER FRAUD?! Fraudulant registrations MUST be subimtted by third parties BY LAW to prevent disenfranchising of one group or another. ACORN did nothing wrong. These INDIVIDUALS stole from ACORN, by accepting pay for a jov they didn't do.
By why let facts get in the way of a good story, huh?
Even you can figure out that registration fraud is the precursor to voter fraud, And to suggest that Acorn is the victim is rediculous, that may work once, but year after year and election after election it just doesn't hold water.
Are you serious? Or better yet, do you actually expect to be taken seriously? Voter registration fraud means voter fraud to you? Not even close. How many of these fraudulent names voted? None and, what's even worse, you know it.
The law requires that these registrations be turned into the government. Then they can check and sort out the fraudulent ones. Otherwise, it would be up to ACORN to decide which registrations should be submitted and which ones should not. Surely, even you can see that they are following the law - not disobeying it. Your attempts to frame them as outside the law is just pathetic.
Even the Bush Doj didn't find anything
In 5-Year Effort, Scant Evidence of Voter Fraud
WASHINGTON, April 11 — Five years after the Bush administration began a crackdown on voter fraud, the Justice Department has turned up virtually no evidence of any organized effort to skew federal elections, according to court records and interviews
"There was nothing that we uncovered that suggested some sort of concerted effort to tilt the election," Richard G. Frohling, an assistant United States attorney in Milwaukee, said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html
The article says "accuses" not "convcted" and while it uses the words "voter fraud" if you actually read it you will find out, again, that it is registration fraud that they are accused of. And again: ACORN is the VICTIM HERE!!! They are the ones who paid to register voters that didn't exsist.
3 up, 3 down - NOW SIT. DOWN. and STFU.
And Poligazette? Really? They first call ACORN a far left liberal organization, they're not. They have no party affiliation. They are not connected to Obama, any longer. He once represented them in a lawsuit, or more appropriately, the firm that Obama worked for represented them. And, ACORN has never received any federal funding. Never.
Your third reference is pathetic. And, to even use that as a reference for anything shows you to be nothing but a pure partisan. It is even more pathetic than using your frankenlies website to support your beliefs. Surely, you can see from the first two sentences that nothing this "article" purports to be true can be taken at face value.
However, I will comment on your first two references. I am curious as to whether or not you (or anyone on the right) knows the difference between voter registration fraud and voter fraud. There is a substantial difference. I can register Mickey Mouse a hundred different times, but it is not going to alter an election unless somehow Mickey Mouse actually shows up to vote on election day. I hope you can understand that simple idea. Also, both of these articles seem to explain that these employees were registering false names in order to justify their pay. That would make ACORN the victim of the fraud. You get that, right? I can only assume you are trying to defend ACORN at this point.
Even the Bush Doj didn't find anything
In 5-Year Effort, Scant Evidence of Voter Fraud
WASHINGTON, April 11 — Five years after the Bush administration began a crackdown on voter fraud, the Justice Department has turned up virtually no evidence of any organized effort to skew federal elections, according to court records and interviews
"There was nothing that we uncovered that suggested some sort of concerted effort to tilt the election," Richard G. Frohling, an assistant United States attorney in Milwaukee, said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html