The early frontrunner for worst question at tonight's Obama presser ...
March 24, 2009 4:13 pm ET by Jamison Foser
One Question I Might Ask Obama....
On politics and the economy: your administration has said that furor over the AIG bonuses is, while understandable, a quote-end-quote -- distraction - from the real issues. But weren't those embers stoked by your own administration...before the AIG issue.....attempting to shift the debate in Washington from fixing the economy to punishing Wall Street?
Are you concerned that your rhetoric about anger, and particularly, anger against Wall Street, helped enflame public anger and distract attention from the economy's real problems?
Wouldn't it be better to ask a question that focuses on "the economy's real problems" rather than one that distracts attention from them?

















Mr. Ambinder's questions brings to mind Rep. John Boehner (R-OH) speaking on the House Floor 'proudly' of how the Republicans did "NOT" have time to read the 1,100 pages re: the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (Stimulus Bill) in 11 hours back in Feb. Hmmm.
Well, I wondered why the Republicans (total of 214) could "NOT" break up the Stimulus Bill's pages by dividing it up amongst the Members and get back with everyone to discuss the 1,100 pages as a Group once the pages were read. 1,100 pages divided by 214 equals "FIVE" whole pages that each Republican Member could have read within minutes. This wouldn't have been hard, huh?
Based on this Mr. President: Would that have made sense to do the break-up of the Stimulus Bill's pages for the Republicans? Is this a standard way on how Congress reads "every" page of "every" Bill? I thought Members of each Party participated together as one when working on America's issues? I'm happy to see the Democrats as a group "tackling" America's problems. But I'm "confused" with what the Republicans are doing, are you? Thanks Mr. President for your time.
I seriously can not figure out what this question is supposed to mean. Is he asking whether the anger over bonuses at AIG is distracting from the "real problem"... part of which is that the government is buying stakes/giving money to AIG?
These bonuses WERE part of the "real problem". Admittedly, they were a small part of it, but symbolically it was huge. What is the point of this question?