In World Net Daily column, Savage claims "rogue homosexual elements within Homeland Security are engaging in extra-constitutional activity" in DHS report on "rightwing extremist activity"
April 16, 2009 8:21 am ET by Media Matters staff
It turns out that Big Sis has just issued a report that warns against the possibility of violence by so-called "right-wing extremists." And what does Big Sis say these right-wingers are concerned about? Illegal aliens, the increasing power of the federal government, gun grabs, abortion and the loss of U.S. national sovereignty. In other words, anyone who is worried about preserving our borders, language and culture is on Big Sis' watch list.
But here's something else that the headlines don't tell you. The report says that these dangerous right-wingers engage in "exploitation of social issues such as ... same-sex marriage." What this means is that even though state after state has rejected gay marriage every time it has been put to a vote of the people, if you oppose the destruction of traditional marriage, if you oppose the gay mafia, then you are suspect. If you aren't happy with her "lifestyle choice," Big Sis will put you on her list.
It seems that rogue homosexual elements within Homeland Security are engaging in extra-constitutional activity. Where is the Republican Party to protect us from this rogue Obama government? Who will be next on the list? The Navy SEALs that shot the Somali pirates? Talk show hosts? Only Big Sis knows for sure.
[...]
But this most recent report from the Department of Homeland Security and Big Sis Napolitano goes even further. It ends on an ominous note. It says, "DHS... will be working with its state and local partners over the next several months to ascertain with greater regional specificity the rise in rightwing extremist activity in the United States, with a particular emphasis on the political, economic, and social factors that drive rightwing extremist radicalization."
This isn't change we can believe in. This is Janet Reno on steroids.
The iron heel is starting to come down. The Homeland Security Department and these fusion centers were not created by Obama but by George W. Bush. And while Obama may ultimately be responsible for suppressing third parties and anybody else whose thinking is out of line with the Marxist mainstream, it was Bush that started the process. So I don't want to hear from lockstep Republicans who insist that this is all Obama's doing. Both sides are to blame. Bush started it, but Obama may finish it, with Big Sis at his side.
Media Matters: The right-wing media's election analysis just ain't that good
The Friday Rush: For conservatives, $400 million buys defeat at the ballot box
The myth of Fox News' ratings spike
Extra constitutional activity?
Oh, You are talking about the nether-rhealm that Dick Cheany lurked in during his VP stint...right???
The government is in a damned -if-you-do damned-if-you-don't situation. On the one hand, they're expected to keep an eye on potential problems and try to head off those problems before people die in a preventable attack. On the other hand, we got a bunch of people jumping up and down, hollering and screaming because they feel their ideological comrades are on the suspect list.
As a buddy of mine used to say "Yeesh. Can't win for losing."
Boy I hope everybody can appreciate how strange and destructive it was, for this worthless report to have been written and somehow cleared for release (or "leaked") to the public.
Please note in the last paragraph of what the Republican media hack wrote above, that he says "...these fusion centers were not created by President Obama, but by George W. Bush", and "...while President Obama may be ultimately responsible... it was Bush that started it", and "both sides are to blame" and then again "Bush started it".
He's admitting to you there, that leftover political hacks from the Bush administration wrote this idiotic report: it was Bush and his man Chertoff who initiated it, and worked it by way of their stooge Roger Mackin (who remains at DHS under the Obama administration, and is head of the Office from where this stupid report comes from, the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis).
And whatever dupes may have been enlisted to sign on to this report, or sign off on it, there's one thing I believe for sure about it: if it was "leaked", then it was leaked to something called a "conservative blogger"... now who would do that: a Bush stooge, or a member of the Obama administration?
This report is poison, and it is destructive, and it was initiated by the Bush administration and the Chertoff DHS (the guy quoted above obliquely confirms that truth for you), and it was then finished and released by the Bush leftover Roger Mackin (or someone in league with him and working for him).
You are seeing the very reason for that report being written and released (or "leaked") to the public: so that media hacks like the above guy can draw attention to it, and thereby embarrass the DHS Department and the Obama administration, who inherited this time-bomb of a destructive report, and the bomber too, Roger Mackin.
One last thing briefly: if there's anyone who thinks there's anything in this report of value, and thinks that those State and local authorities for whom it was supposedly written and released to (and that's the supposed use of the report), if you think the report contains anything of use to them, it does not... it is just a mindless bunch of inane words like "extremism" and "radicalization", all describing nothing but dim and strange impressions of the world... there is nothing specific and of value in it, to any State or Metro cop in Atlanta or New York or St. Louis or Seattle or Chicago or Los Angeles... they would all look at this idiotic report, titled "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment"... they'd be bufuddled, those real world cops would, at even reading such nonsense, never mind trying to interpret it... they'd say:
"Chit, if the DHS or the FBI or any part of our Intelligence Community has anything important to communicate to me, wouldn't they be specific, and tell me of persons and places and events that are real and actual, tell me of those things so that I can address them where I work? Why would they waste my time with abstract and vague nonsense about "rightwing extremism" and "radicalization"? That's not actual Intelligence... that's stupidity! Only stupid people talk like that, I could never do my job, which involves actual persons places and events, by sitting around talking about "extremism" and "radicalization" and crap like that."
... and the cop, he'd throw the report in the trash, as being something that maybe interests idiot intellectuals who talk like that, but not him.
And he might wonder aloud "Why was that foolish report written, about "extremism" and "radicalization", and why was it sent to me?"
Good question: why did the idiotically named Extremism and Radicalization Branch of the DHS's Office of Intelligence and Analysis (Roger Mackin's Office), why did they write this stupid report, and then release it to the public... or why did they "leak" it, "leak" it to a "conservative blogger"?