About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Meghan McCain says what the press won't about Cheney and Rove

April 24, 2009 8:28 am ET by Eric Boehlert

As little interest I have in legitimizing daughter McCain's place at the forefront of our media landscape, during her recent appearance on The View (this whole premise pains me....) she said out loud what virtually nobody inside the Beltway press has dared to in recent weeks. McCain was discussing Karl Rove and Dick Cheney's relentless attack campaign against Obama. Y'know, the guy they lost to--badly--in November.

Said McCain:

It's very unprecedented for someone like Karl Rove or Dick Cheney to be criticizing the president. My big criticism is just, you had your eight years, go away.

God bless her because McCain speaks the unvarnished truth; a truth the press is too afraid to acknowledge. And it's this: We have simply never seen, in modern American politics, the losing VP and a losing top WH adviser smear and belittle a new president, just weeks into his first term, the way Rove and Cheney now routinely do in the media. Why? Because such conduct among grown-up politicians was considered unconscionable, shameless, and pitiful. Period.

Because those were the ground rules the press established: if you, or your side, lost the November election (and especially if your side lost in a rout), you went away for a long time and remained silent. (Think Michael Dukakis or Bob Dole.)

The press used to consider it beneath contempt for the losing side to take partisan swipes at the White House winner during the early days of his presidency. Note that in 2001, Sen. Hillary Clinton waited until May before she made her first public criticism of president Bush. (She did it during a speech on the floor of the U.S. Senate, not on cable TV.)

And former VP Al Gore waited 21 months before he re-entered the public debate, giving a speech in San Francisco in 2002 where he raised all kinds of concerns about looming plans for war in Iraq. He waited so long, I suspect, because the press made it absolutely clear that Gore's opinions were not welcome at the table. Unless, that is, he wanted to suffer the wrath of the punditocracy which was just itching to label him a "sore loser."

That's how the game was played for decades. But Cheney goes public with claims that Obama, weeks into his first terms, is making America less safe and the Beltway press doesn't flinch. The press corps acts like it's normal; like that's what all former VP's do right after they vacate the WH. It's not. It's unprecedented.

At least Meghan McCain provides the context.

UPDATE: The NYT very gently addresses the issue today in a piece about Cheney's attack campaign.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mk3872 (April 24, 2009 10:27 am ET)
         

      She has no fear. She has more guts than the MSM and our press that is more worried about insider access than actual news.

      Give her credit, she deserves it here.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ericfree (April 24, 2009 10:56 am ET)
         
      These people never intended to leave power. They were forced out against their wills, so find nothing wrong in continuing as though they're still in control. It's an extension of the administration-long pushback against reality based thinking.

      Bush, Rove and Cheney probably never saw McCain as an acceptable face to continue their reign either and probably weren't reluctant to make it plain, accounting for the tension between the two camps now. Hard to see who would have been acceptable; even Jeb would have been too independent. If they could have gotten away with it, they probably would have run, or preferably appointed, Cheney or Rove, they way Harriet Miers was nominated for the Supreme Court and Gonzalez ended up attorney general. Obama's popularity and relative success must be near psychopathically frustrating for them, as is the strain of continually looking in a mirror and projecting the image onto their enemies.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (April 24, 2009 11:49 am ET)
           
        True. The Bush Sr and Jr administrations were mostly the same people only interupted by their relentless hounding of Clinton. No doubt there will be a special prosecuter to find out why Obama bowed to Saudis while Jeb prepares to move the gang back to the White House.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by womzilla (April 24, 2009 2:07 pm ET)
         

      The idea that past presidents don't criticize current ones is only true for Democrats criticizing Republicans. The other 'way round is just fine.

      New York Times, May 16, 1993

      Reagan Criticizes Plan to Kill 'Star Wars'

      Warning that the nation was cutting military spending too quickly, former President Ronald Reagan attacked the Clinton Administration today for plans to kill the "Star Wars" program.

      Remember, the rules are different for Republicans, at every step of the process. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (April 24, 2009 2:53 pm ET)
           
        Good point.  I remember when Clinton mildly criticized the handling of the Iraq War the media were up in arms.  It was "unprecidented" for a former President to criticize a sitting Prez and displayed some sort of distrubing character flaw in Clinton.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (April 24, 2009 2:47 pm ET)
         
      Much that was once considered unconsionable, shameless and pitful has been standard operating procedure for the Reps since the Republican Revolution of the 1990's.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by spooky3 (April 24, 2009 9:35 pm ET)
         
      I like everything you said in this piece, except the first part of the first sentence. Why is it necessary? I don't think you intended it this way, but it could be seen as taking a swipe at women (whether Ms. McCain or the women on the View). Adult kids of politicians (e.g., Reagan, Jr.) have made comments for a long time and some of them have been paid to do so; the View doesn't seem to be different from other forums (fora?) for political commentary as well as entertainment. 
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (April 25, 2009 1:21 pm ET)
           
        That's actually an interesting point, Spooky.  I think I tend to agree with it.
        Report Abuse