About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

MSNBC treats torture investigation as political game

April 27, 2009 10:37 am ET by Jamison Foser

MSNBC's Norah O'Donnell and Reuters' Jon Decker just had an exchange that illustrates the media's troubling tendency to view potential investigations into illegal torture as a political matter:

Norah O'Donnell: "John, if you open this book, and you start editing this book, and going through it page by page, then what about the Democrats in Congress, some that may have had briefings on these very types of harsh interrogation tactics?

Jon Decker: That's a really good point, Norah. There is concern that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, during course of the briefings she got on these harsh interrogation tactics, essentially gave tacit approval to them. And there may be some other senior Democratic leaders that were privy to these discussions given to them, by senior military and intelligence officials, that may be caught up in these memos as well. So I think that is something that Democrats need to be concerned about and also think about before they move forward with this call for a truth commission.

O'Donnell and Decker could have treated the possibility that Democratic leaders in Congress were aware of torture* as all the more reason to get to the bottom of who knew and approved of what, and when. Instead, they used the possibility to warn Democrats against pursuing the question further. That's how you would expect to see Cheney loyalists behave - but it's odd to see journalists issuing a political warning to Democrats, and to suggest that political considerations rather than finding the truth should drive officials' actions.

* Note also that O'Donnell and Decker kept calling it "harsh interrogation."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mk3872 (April 27, 2009 11:11 am ET)
         

      But is "harsh interrogation" ISN'T "torture", then what is it?

      They are assuming that there was a new gray category suddenly defined along with "9/11 suspect", which is a complete non sequitur.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (April 27, 2009 11:57 am ET)
         

      These days I'm a pretty unapolegetic liberal, but if there WERE democrats who supported these techniques, I want to know, and I want them removed from office and punnished according to the law, along with everybody else.  And, like President Obama, I woudln't go after the agents who were "just following oders."  To often we punnish the foot soldiers, and not the officers or public officials in charge.  THEY bear the responsibility.  To the extent that any dems supported this, that should be revealed. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by lesterayers5936 (April 27, 2009 1:24 pm ET)
         
      i am getting tired of people defending torture. the way i look at it if i had family members that were captured i would not want them tortured .that is why we should not water board any body!!i bet if you could ask ,bush,chaney sean.ann,joe sarbough and and rush anybody else that is for torture they do not have any members that have been capture or in the service.it makes it a lot easier to shoot there mouth off.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.