Byron York continues media tradition of pretending views of non-whites don't count
April 29, 2009 3:27 pm ET by Jamison Foser
Matthew Yglesias and Dave Weigel catch Byron York making the transparently stupid argument that Barack Obama's positions "appear a bit more popular overall than they actually are" because of his "his sky-high ratings among African-Americans." As Yglesias notes: "How does the fact that much of Obama's support come from African-Americans mean that he's not 'actually' popular?"
You'd have to try pretty hard to come up with an explanation other than racism for York's position that support among African Americans shouldn't count as much as support from whites.
But York's argument, though absurd, is actually quite consistent with the way the media in general approaches public opinion.
When reporters talk about Democrats' difficulty appealing to religious voters, for example, they mean white religious voters, and point to polling of white evangelical voters to support their claims.
When they talk of Democrats being out of touch with "regular people," they aren't talking about working-class African Americans or Latinos; they are talking about white regular people.
York's comments about Obama's support is just one example of the media's habit of equating public opinion among whites with public opinion.
UPDATE: More from Steve Benen and Adam Serwer.
Is York saying that black people don't count or is he saying they only like Obama because he's black and therefore their opinion is invalid? Either way he sounds like a dink. Kind of reminds me of the whole 'Obama is polarizing' thing a month or so back. How dare he be more popular among his own party than the opposing party!
Doesn't matter even when the proof hits them in the face, does it?
Remember when these clowns were claiming that the opinion polls leading up to the election were skewed because people were afraid to say they would NOT vote for a black guy????