About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Working the refs. It works!

May 13, 2009 9:00 am ET by Eric Boehlert

At least it worked in Philly, where the Inquirer turned to disgraced Torture Memo Man John Yoo to write a monthly column. Why would the newspaper want someone like Yoo to pontificate in its pages? According to today's report in the NYTimes, it's because the Inquirer was trying to counter claims that the paper has a liberal bias.

Score one for Newsbusters!

From the Times:

“There was a conscious effort on our part to counter some of the criticism of The Inquirer as being a knee-jerk liberal publication,” [Inquirer editorial page editor Harold] Jackson said. “We made a conscious effort to add some conservative voices to our mix.”

Guess that's why the Inquirer also tapped former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum to pen a column (at five times the normal pay rate), because the paper was trying to counter criticism from the right-wing. Nothing wrong with diversity on the Op-ed pages, although as Media Matters has noted, if U.S. newspaper lack an opinion voice there, it's a liberal one.

But also keep in mind that the Inquirer serves an hugely Democratic city in a state that, according to voting patterns, is galloping away from the GOP. But under pressure from the right, the Inquirer scrambles to hire a discredited voice like Yoo's, and a politician like Santorum, who PA. voters overwhelmingly rejected at the polls.

Meanwhile, our fave part of the Times article was this passage:

“What I liked about John Yoo is he’s a Philadelphian,” [publisher Brian] Tierney said. “He went to Episcopal Academy, where I went to school."

Yoo is perfect for the job because he went to the same exclusive, private high school as the publisher!

Amateur hour.

UPDATE: Philly's Will Bunch makes some important points.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mk3872 (May 13, 2009 9:37 am ET)
      2  
      Don't blame conservatives for this. Newsbusters is what it is.

      Blame liberals.

      This is yet again another example of weak-kneed libs caving in to the right wing noise machine.

      Pathetic.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (May 13, 2009 2:11 pm ET)
           
        Is the Inquirer really liberal? I think that's just an excuse but even if it's the real reason why Yoo (and why Santorum?) I'm sure they could've easily found conservative writers with better creds and less baggage.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mk3872 (May 13, 2009 2:28 pm ET)
             
          May or may not be. That fact that the editor felt the paper had that "impression" because they felt pressure from the right-wing noise machine is all that you need to know.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by shaggles (May 13, 2009 4:54 pm ET)
               
            I don't think that's really all I need to know. You're right in part though. Whether the paper itself is liberal or not is irrelevant. What I should've asked is 'Is the editor really liberal?' It's not really fair to blame this on weak kneed liberals without knowing that.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mk3872 (May 14, 2009 3:19 am ET)
                 
              There is no fact-based "test" that one person or a newspaper is liberal or not. It is all about impressions. On the other side of the equation, Washington Times, Fox News or World Net Daily would never cave to pressure and hire liberal voices.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by Ecotopian (May 13, 2009 10:43 am ET)
         
      Even granting the Inquirer's point about a need to add "conservative voices," it didn't need to go to the right-wing loony bin to find them. Why not seek some perspectives from what's left of the sane right? (Oops, now I'm having a hard time coming up with names.)
      Report Abuse
      • Author by BISHAMON (May 13, 2009 12:06 pm ET)
           
        The ranks of the non-yahoo Right are pretty thin, aren't they?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by temphandle flaw90tangible (May 13, 2009 11:42 am ET)
         
      Working the refs does work wonders, but this isn't really about that. It's about a rightwing ownership (Tierney, et al) doing as it pleases with the Op/Ed pages -- with absolute contempt for the readers. Seriously, their business model, as far as I can tell, is:

      1. Slash staff
      2. Crap on readers
      3. ???
      4. Profit!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by harley (May 13, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
         

      Of course most newspapers are liberal biased because they report on facts, data, and reality.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by frankbyron (May 13, 2009 1:04 pm ET)
         
      it's because the Inquirer was trying to counter claims that the paper has a liberal bias.

      And newspapers wonder why they're losing readers. Heaven forbid an editorial page might not be overrun with right wing viewpoints, as they're not represented anywhere else in the corporate media. I always hate to see a decent newspaper go down, but I hope a lot of readers cancel their subscriptions over this. The fact that Yoo hasn't been disbarred is bad enough, but to have to read him in my local paper would be the final insult.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by alanrsnipes1372 (May 13, 2009 3:26 pm ET)
         
      John Yoo does not even believe in democrasy.
      He thinks that a President has the right to do anything at anytime.
      He does not believe in checks and balances.

      He believes in totalitarian government.
      His legal theories have been discredited by people on the right as well as people on the left.

      But, since he went to the same school as one of his bosses, that means he must be qualified.
      This is an old boy quota system.
      Report Abuse