Right-wing media continue to hint at anti-Obama violence

A rifle pointing at the temple our president is "a bit of a stretch"? Really?

Also note the subtlety of the captions:

Why are gun sales surging? Because Obama drops a bomb on Wall Street, that's why!

Then you're an idiot. More likely some editor thought he'd be sute with nary a thougha s to how tastless it was. Would you give a liberla site the benfit of the doubt if Bush and Cheney were there instead of Obama and Jackson? Well... if you would YOU'RE AN IDIOT. Because I can assure that THAT would have been both tasteless AND intentional as well.

We know what they are thinking. They will take jabs at Obama any way they can.

Fair points, Matt. Though, I still don't trust Faux and wouldn't put it past them that this in intentional or an "oversight" like putting a "D" after Mark Foley.

It's pretty obvious to me what's going on. The same thing that's been going on since President Obama took office.

"Look out everyone, there's a black man in the WHITE HOUSE!!!"

Randi apologised for that skit, which was done without her approval. But she took responsibility for it. It was in bad taste and should never have been aired.

As for that movie, which I've only heard about. It sounded gawd-awful to me, and WAS condemned. Overwhelming approval from whom?

It's false equivalency to the max. Frankly, it's surprising considering all the harm that Bush/co did to this country and others that there wasn't more of that during those 8 long years. But violent imagery seems to be the order of the day for the right-wing.

Was there a story related to the Obama girls on the same page or something?

No, Obama's children went with the story about dead kids. Ok to raise an eyebrow or two now?

The question one must ask oneself is: Who picked the kids to be pictured and why? Is there not any thought that goes into editing? This is deliberate and as a parent the President should take offense and simply suggest that it is wrong. Of course, the Loonies will then scream that Obama is denying them freedom of the press or speech or whatever nonsense they can use.
Isn't it a shame that the cowards behind these pictures aren't named. That is why they are cowards. I wonder what would happen if their children were 'used' next to an article about a father sexually abusing his children. Where is Hannity to defend the children of the President.
And if you are kind of annoyed if someone picks this up TOO BAD. Would you want your kids faces attached to something like this? Or sexual abuse? Remember, the article is about dead children......

You should have an open mind, but not so far open that your brains fall out. These things are CONSIOUS DECISIONS. They don't just happen. Are they "calling for violence." No. They're probably just tasteless attempts at humor. But the press does influence people, and the tasteless ness of these items is so egregious that they deserve to be called out. (As would any liberal site making a joke about assassinating Bush or Cheney.)