About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Politico blows kisses to Charles Krauthammer

May 20, 2009 3:00 pm ET by Eric Boehlert

Because pundits on the far-right who write nasty things about Democrats and important and influential. That's simply how the Beltway press works.

So of course, Politico sends a reporter to visit Krauthammer in his corner D.C. office in order to write up a gushing profile about how influential Krauthammer's (robotic) dissents about Obama have become. (Conservatives email his columns around!) To write up this fantasy that Krauthammer has somehow emerged as a clarion voice. That the Fox News talker and Iraq war cheerleader is a "a coherent, sophisticated and implacable critic of the new president."  

Oh brother.  

The headline really gives the game away:

Obama's biggest critic: Krauthammer

First, the declaration is a joke because the entire GOP Noise Machine has been uniformly critical of Obama this year. There is very little variation from the talking points. They attack everything he does. So how and why would Politico possibly select Krauthammer as somehow being particularly influential. (Politico doesn't point to any of Krauthammer's work that's in any way distinguishable from the avalanche of over-excited Obama critiques launched by the right.) It's not possible to distinguish a voice in that GOP pundits crowd because they're pretty much all saying the exact same thing. Period.

Second, note the stated assumption that whoever is "Obama's biggest critic" is automatically a big deal; is somebody the press needs to pay attention to and to flatter in media profiles.

Here's a neat trick. Go dig through Nexis and see if you can find any mainstream media profile from May of 2001, that toasted "Bush's biggest critic." I'm almost sure no such profile exists because the press, in spring of 2001, didn't care about Bush's liberal critics. They didn't take those people seriously. But in May 2009, "Obama's biggest critic" garners a Beltway valentine.

How silly is this Krauthammer piece? Read this passage as Politico tries  to explain why Krauthammer is (supposedly) the new Master of the Anti-Obama Universe [emphasis added]:

But the key to Krauthammer’s appeal is the clarity of his opposition to Obama, which began soon after a December 2006 column in which he urged Obama to run for president and guaranteed that he would lose.

Got that? Krauthammer stands out among Obama haters (my term) because he guaranteed Obama would lose in 2008. Krauthammer never saw last year's landslide election coming--was sure Obama would lose--and yet just months later the Politico rushes in to toast his brilliance.

Again: Wrong about Iraq, wrong about the 2008 campaign. But according to Politico, Krauthammer's at the top of his game.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 20, 2009 3:10 pm ET)
      1 1
      Krauthammer isn't Obama's biggest critic, but he is in the running for Obama's most ignorant critic.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seeryer (May 20, 2009 3:40 pm ET)
         
      I thought Joe Klein sort of tastlessly remarked on CK's handicap in the piece. What is Joe Klein's excuse for being wrong? I am no fan of CK and think the Politico is just pandering to conservatives as usual. But I REALLY think Joe Klein is a douche.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eyeswideopen1 (May 20, 2009 3:55 pm ET)
         
      What else would you expect from a party that has besically become a regional party who's heart and soul is largely reich-wing media.

      They are nothing more than a glorified corporate lobbying ground.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by temphandle afflict14sawdust (May 20, 2009 7:40 pm ET)
        1
      Eric, when did a 6% win become a landslide?

      Carolyn Kay
      MakeThemAccountable.com
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (May 20, 2009 11:26 pm ET)
           
        I'd imagine compared to many presidential races in recent history, it's a pretty good margin.
        How much of an percentage would you need to call it a landslide.
        How much did Shrub need to declare a mandate?
        If Major Judd's electoral machine elect's his nephew Bob as County Sherriff 80% to 5%, is that a landslide, Or some other more colorful geological catastrophy?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by LuvLuLu (May 20, 2009 11:51 pm ET)
           
        An incredible number of former safe Republican seats went Democratic. Fomerly solidly Republican states voted for Obama. No big time Democrat lost an election.

        That's a landslide. It really hurts your credibility when your first post here is a ridiculous objection to a reasonable statement.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by temphandle afflict14sawdust (May 21, 2009 5:28 pm ET)
             
          Not my first post.

          It is really low of you to question my credibility over a perfectly logical and acceptable question.

          I'm seeing these kinds of attacks on many sites, and I'm starting to get seriously worried. Any slight questioning of the rightness and greatness of a certain party is attacked viciously and hatefully.

          It's not going to help either Obama or the progressive movement in the long run.

          Carolyn Kay
          MakeThemAccountable.com
          Report Abuse
          • Author by steeve (May 21, 2009 6:20 pm ET)
               
            You'd better leave the internet right now. If the above was "vicious" and "hateful", you will not survive when you actually see something vicious and hateful.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by steeve (May 21, 2009 6:23 pm ET)
               
            And incidentally, each party gets 40% of the presidential vote by default. That's why 6% is a landslide.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by seriously (May 21, 2009 7:40 pm ET)
         
      This piece, so crackling with indignation and pique that Boehlert can’t get through the first sentence without a typo, is nothing if not ironic. He attacks Krauthammer for being a cookie-cutter conservative, indistinguishable from other Obama detractors – and he makes this claim in the echo chamber of Media Matters, where liberal mantras are chanted reflexively and with near-perfect uniformity.

      Boehlert’s claim that “the press, in spring of 2001, didn't care about Bush's liberal critics” is ridiculous. If it’s true that no “biggest” Bush critic had been crowned by that time, it’s nonsense to assert he didn’t have vociferous opposition. So many liberals had simply rejected his legitimacy that it would have been hard to name a single king or queen of anti-Bush disdain.

      What's more, early on, the Politico piece compares Krauthammer to “the kind of leader of the opposition that economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman represented for the left during the Bush years.” Boehlert sets out to expose media bias in Politico, but what's most clear in this bungled critique is his personal loathing for Krauthammer.

      Of course, the notion that there’s a “biggest” Obama critic is questionable and merely a manufactured news peg. But given the scope of his proposals, no matter where you stand, it’s not surprising that Obama’s ambitious agenda is galvanizing opposition.

      Truly surprising is that Obama lover (my term) Boehlert misses the biggest news item in an otherwise ho-hum Politico piece mainly of interest to the politically obsessed: Joe Klein’s reprehensible and irrational claim that Krauthammer is wrong on Iraq because he’s wheelchair bound and can’t see it for himself. Beethoven wrote the Ninth Symphony when he was completely deaf. And “seeing things for himself” hasn’t stopped Joe Klein from remaining a second-rate commentator and first-class bigot.

      *That’s* media that matters, but Boehlert is too committed to a playground shouting match to hear when something truly notable and offensive gets said.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by omgamoderate (May 22, 2009 12:12 pm ET)
         
      This is absolutely ridiculous and pitiful. I do not believe that you can't perceive a difference between Charles Krauthammer and the typical conservative Obama critic. Aside from the fact that he does articulate different points from many other conservatives, the piece clearly states that he stands out because of his CLARITY. If you seriously think that Krauthammer, in this regard, is indistinguishable from the conservative masses, you have never read him, or, more likely, needed to write something under a deadline and ejaculated this throwaway column in desperation.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seriously (May 22, 2009 2:10 pm ET)
         
      This piece, so crackling with indignation and pique that Boehlert can’t get through the first sentence without a typo, is nothing if not ironic. He attacks Krauthammer for being a cookie-cutter conservative, indistinguishable from other Obama detractors – and he makes this claim in the echo chamber of Media Matters, where liberal mantras are chanted reflexively and with near-perfect uniformity.

      Boehlert’s claim that “the press, in spring of 2001, didn't care about Bush's liberal critics” is ridiculous. If it’s true that no “biggest” Bush critic had been crowned by that time, it’s nonsense to assert he didn’t have vociferous opposition. So many liberals had simply rejected his legitimacy that it would have been hard to name a single king or queen of anti-Bush disdain.

      What's more, early on, the Politico piece compares Krauthammer to “the kind of leader of the opposition that that economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman represented for the left during the Bush years.” Boehlert sets out to expose media bias in Politico, but what's most clear in this bungled critique is his personal loathing for Krauthammer.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.

Weekly Columns

Feed Icon

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace