About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Right-wing bloggers uncover Obama's Enemies List (And it comes with a seven year warranty!)

May 28, 2009 12:08 pm ET by Eric Boehlert

One of the questions I get asked most often as I do interviews about my new book, Bloggers on the Bus: How the Internet Changed Politics and the Press, is why is it that conservatives trail so far behind liberals when it comes to building their side of the blogosphere into something important and influential. The simple answer is that so many right-wing bloggers aren't serious people and the nonsense they blog about revolves around loopy conspiracy theories that, aside for providing comic relief, aren't really good for anything.

Which bring me to the budding Obama scandal that's been hatched this week within the right-wing blogosphere, and which has all the hallmarks of previous failed Obama conspiracy theories that bloggers excitedly chased. The latest to be embraced is the idea that the Obama White House, as part of the restructuring that the auto maker has been forced to undergo, personally selected which Chrysler dealership would be closed. Not only that, but the Obama White House punished dealerships whose owners who gave campaign contributions to Republicans.

It's just like Nixon's Enemies' List!

Go here if you want to read the pained analysis, where bloggers excitedly claim that their research proves a massive conspiracy's afoot. What is the research? It's a laundry list of name of dealers who have indeed given money to the GOP and have indeed been closed down as part of the GM restructuring. So why doesn't that prove Obama has a hit list? First, because nearly 800 dealerships are being closed down, yet bloggers only detail campaign contributions for less than 10 percent of those dealership owners.

Second, all the bloggers actually prove is that lot of dealership owners are Republicans. Does that surprise anyone?

So rather than uncovering massive White House conspiracy to throw thousands of auto industry workers of work simply as a way to "punish" GOP donors, all the bloggers have proven--I'm repeating myself, I know--is that car dealership owners tend to write checks to Republicans. And all this time I had thought of dealerships as a bastion of progressive politics.

The only way GOP bloggers could get this whole soggy mess off the ground is if they can prove, definitively, that Chrysler dealers who survived the cut were all massive, across-the-board, Democratic donors. But bloggers don't and I suspect they cannot because local car dealership owners tend to give lots of money to Republicans.

Thanks for the news flash.

P.S. And no, bloggers don't even pretend to produce any evidence that the Obama White House somehow peered over GM's shoulders and picked which dealership got canned and which ones survived.

UPDATE: When Michelle Malkin of all people urges people not to get carried away with an anti-Obama conspiracy theory, you know the story's going nowhere.

UPDATE: Malkin's changed her mind and now thinks the Obama-closed-Chrysler-dealerships is a big, big story, which means more comedy is bound to ensue.

At first, Malkin urged caution on the story but apparently after Fox News producers invited her on to discuss the (pseudo) scandal, Malkin decided it was legit. Ah, right-wing bloggers....

UPDATE: Nate Silver demolishes the right-wing Dealergate with, y'know, actual research. He also notes this:

It shouldn't be any surprise, by the way, that car dealers tend to vote -- and donate -- Republican. They are usually male, they are usually older (you don't own an auto dealership in your 20s), and they have obvious reasons to be pro-business, pro-tax cut, anti-green energy and anti-labor. Car dealerships need quite a bit of space and will tend to be located in suburban or rural areas. I can't think of too many other occupations that are more natural fits for the Republican Party

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by pete592 (May 28, 2009 12:21 pm ET)
        1
      Great job, Eric.

      BTW, bad link under "nearly 800 dealership..."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by AveSharia (May 28, 2009 12:28 pm ET)
      1 5
      This article comes a day late and a dollar short.

      First of all, every single article and story on Dealergate since yesterday has referenced the fact the Democratic donors' dealerships are staying open, and that the Republican donor dealerships that are closing weren't universally failing.

      Do some research, man.

      Second, you make several statements that are at best ignorant of the stories out there, and at worst bald-faced lies. Your first PS is bunk, because most of the stories reference an attorney suing on behalf of the dealerships as believing that the closings weren't Chrysler's decision, but the White House's.

      Finally, Nate Silver's piece is the same as yours: It ignores the actual research that has been done with respect to remaining-open dealerships, and attacks the straw-man that remains.

      Grow up, man.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (May 28, 2009 1:29 pm ET)
        1  
        This is frikkin' hilarious...

        How stupid are these people? And then they wonder why they keep getting trounced in elections.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (May 28, 2009 1:33 pm ET)
        1  
        Rush Limbaugh has just referenced the "attorney" suing on behalf of the Dealerships..

        Apparently, he's with the law firm Kettleman, Savage and Dipstick. He works out of Limbaugh's garage.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (May 28, 2009 1:41 pm ET)
        4  
        What part of the "90% of dealerships" donated money to republican causes or candidates did you not understand? I only ask because statistically speaking, the vast majority of dealerships that were sent closing letters would indeed be donating to republican causes. It has nothing to do with an alleged enemies list, it has to do with numbers.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by AveSharia (May 29, 2009 8:18 am ET)
             
          What part of "they're talking about OPEN dealerships" don't you understand?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (May 28, 2009 2:30 pm ET)
        2  
        First of all, every single article and story on Dealergate since yesterday has referenced the fact the Democratic donors' dealerships are staying open, and that the Republican donor dealerships that are closing weren't universally failing.

        Please link us to them.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by AveSharia (May 29, 2009 8:20 am ET)
             
          The story that started the fuss:

          http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2009/05/dealergate-statistical-evidence-that.html
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pete592 (May 29, 2009 11:01 am ET)
               
            A BLOG???

            This is the summation of "every single article and story"???

            LMFAO.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by creeksneakers2 (May 28, 2009 2:55 pm ET)
        3  
        The MMfA article because it talks about closing Chrysler dealerships to restructure GM. That makes no sense. I think they mean closed Chrysler dealerships.

        Chrysler embarked on a program to close dealerships, Project Genesis, all the way back in February 2008. Obama had nothing to do with it. Blaming Obama is just a usual right wing trick. I heard Rush Limbaugh say the whole thing was Obama's idea.

        http://www.carseek.com/news/february2008/Chrysler-announces-Project-Genesis/

        Now there is an accusation that he had a role in choosing WHICH dealerships were closed. I haven't seen the evidence, but most of the closed dealerships were in small towns. That's where Republicans lurk so one would expect the dealers there to donate to Republicans. If the people pushing the accusation could come up with comparable lists of closed and open dealerships and show that all the open ones donated to Democrats and all the closed ones donated Republican they'd have an anomoly we could look at. They still wouldn't have proof.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (May 28, 2009 3:16 pm ET)
          3  
          You're right, of course. Even if they show that a higher percentage of Republican Dealerships are closed, that proves nothing. You also have to take into account the relative demographics. As you point out, small town businesspeople are probably more likely to be Republican, especially in the South.

          Also, in the South, big cities have a higher concentration of Democrats, so dealers in big cities are probably more likely to be Democrats.

          But, again, we're talking logic, which bounces off of Troglodytes like rubber bullets off an Abrams Tank.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (May 28, 2009 2:16 pm ET)
         
      Does this mean, democrats are better business people?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by evenhanded23 (May 28, 2009 6:23 pm ET)
           
        Dealerships in urban areas are likly to be larger...not necessarily better. However, if Chysler dumped the smaller dearlships...they are more likely to be rural dealerships. Smaller business size has nothing to do with party affiliation, but rural/urban does.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by glodie (May 28, 2009 2:26 pm ET)
        1
      Eric,

      Your article is "comic relief" and shows how ignorant you are of the facts. Chrysler is NOT even a GM product! Why is it even an issue to close dealerships. This will not save the manufacturer anything. The dealerships are independantly owned. The more dealers, the more sales. One day you will see the light but it may be too late.

      Go back to sleep!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by LuvLuLu (May 28, 2009 7:52 pm ET)
        1  
        Actually, what your post shows is your ignorance.

        There are two issues here. One is about Chrysler dealerships, and Obama supposedly picking them, and the other is GM dealerships, and the fact that the ones being cloced are donors to Republicans.

        Then you display even more of your ignorance, and say that the more dealers, the more sales. That's crazy. Just because there are more gas stations doesn't make people need more gas, and just because there might be more dealerships doesn't make people need more cars. More dealers does not equate to more car sales! More dealers creates more market share at times, but not more sales. Car makers are making fewer models and cutting whole brands to save money, and so they need fewer dealerships to sell those fewer brands.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by AveSharia (May 29, 2009 8:22 am ET)
             
          Actually, no.

          As there is no list of GM dealerships, as far as I know, being examined, "Dealergate" deals exclusively with Chrysler dealerships, at least for now.

          But you wouldn't know that, because you haven't actually read the research.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (May 28, 2009 2:51 pm ET)
      2  
      Let's look at this from another angle. If, as charged, the Democrats are plotting to close down Republican-owned dealerships, the question arises... Why?

      What could they possibly gain by doing so? Do car dealers give so much money to the Republicans that it will make a huge difference in the next election?

      But, I realize that logic is not the Troglodyte's friend, so this urban myth will join the Birth Certificate story and Glenn Beck's ACORN Marxist Takeover fabrication in the WingNut Hall of Fame.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (May 28, 2009 3:54 pm ET)
           
        Wouldn't make sense, since Obama raised far more money than McCain anyway. TONS more.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (May 28, 2009 4:33 pm ET)
             
          I'm dying to find out if Ted Baxter has this on the Factor tonight.

          Honestly, these loons are more fun than going to a comedy club.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Brian in FL (May 28, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
           
        Good point. What is the motive? And aren't there MUCH easier ways of attacking "enemies"? Did we liberals secretly cause Chrysler to fail in an elaborate plot to use taxpayer money to bail them out, all so we could then punish these car dealers for their donations to Republicans? It's beyond absurd.

        Wouldn't these car dealers be MORE likely to donate to Republicans in the future if they felt Obama closed their dealership? That could lead to even larger donations against Obama in the future from these businessmen.

        Also, if Obama was so hell-bent on targeting Republicans, why pick a Republican as TRANSPORTATION Secretary? Why pick a Republican to run Defense? Why pick a Republican for Commerce Secretary? Were these Republicans part of the go-after-Republican car dealers plot too?

        If Obama is so vehement about going after Republicans any way possible, why isn't he launching major investigations of the Bush White House? Why all the outreach to Republican lawmakers? Why invite Schwarzenegger to the White House and basically give him credit for the raised fuel efficiency standards? If anything, rather than target Republicans, Obama's efforts have all been about uniting with them on various issues. With all that evidence, we're supposed to believe Obama is secretly targeting Republican car dealerships??? THAT is the one area he chose to finally become a radical lefty?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pole9191913183 (May 28, 2009 3:21 pm ET)
        4
      Obama thinks he's Tony Soprano now- strong-arming legitimate, legal rights and claims from hedge funds... mafia-style, including union death-threats... so he could hand 55% of Chrysler over to the UAW, who donated $5M to his campaign.

      If that's not stealing, I don't know what is... it doesn't matter how much you dislike hedge funds.

      Now he's destroying the evil capitalists that didn't support his fraudulent, disingenuous campaign?

      The White House says there's "no evidence"- note that Hitler was careful to only give verbal orders, too... and Obama's not new to this sort of thing.

      Obama's completely out-of-control. But what did anyone expect with a neutered press, compliant congress, and cabinet full of sycophants?

      http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Buzzramjet (May 28, 2009 5:58 pm ET)
        2  
        Are you being serious? Or is this some sort of Colbert Report type of post?

        Sopranos?

        Hitler?

        Out of control?

        Seriously?

        Here's a quarter...go buy yourself a clue.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mattcable250650 (May 28, 2009 11:12 pm ET)
             
          The guy posted a picture of Pelosi getting waterboarded by Dick & George at the bottom of his first post. Yeah, he's serious, serious as a complete psycho.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by CalDamage (May 28, 2009 6:35 pm ET)
           
        I'm a liberal. I'm also capitalist. Always have been. These car companies haven't been for years. They've been protected from the world market by their friends in government, as well as some labor leaders who drank the kool-aid about safety and emission standards costing jobs. Well, now the bankruptcy of their methods has become apparent.

        So someone is finally forcing the US car companies to pay attention to the future of their companies and their markets, not just the quarterly profit margin and their next bonus.

        The fun is, even if a Republican had won the White House, this is how it would have turned out. The alternative is an extra 3 million out of work, and several states bankrupt. And, of course, your ilk (ReagaNazis) forced to acknowledge that what was good for Republicans wasn't good for America.

        BTW: "neutered press, compliant congress, and cabinet full of sycophants": See also "Bush Administration."
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Lazlo P. Hollyfeld (May 28, 2009 4:35 pm ET)
      1  
      While it's not surprising that there would be a poorly communicated and imperfect process around closing dealerships, I can't find any real research that the closings were politically motivated. The Doug Ross bit about RGL dealerships is the closest thing to real facts, and even those fall far short of damming (many of the dealerships closed made no political contributions, and there is no mention of relative performance/profitability or viable market in those ares).
      Were these closing done well? Certainly not, and I hope some of these dealers find redress in the bankruptcy court.
      Political conspiracy? Please. Ineptitude is far far more prevalent than malevolence.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (May 28, 2009 11:40 pm ET)
         
      It's not just rural or Republican strongholds.

      Timberline Dodge smack dab in the middle of Portland, Oregon is on the chopping block.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.

Weekly Columns

Feed Icon