About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

WND celebrates its impact on Fox News' trafficking in birth certificate theories

May 29, 2009 11:12 am ET by Media Matters staff

From a May 29 WorldNetDaily article:

WorldNetDaily Fox Nation

WND also used Fox Nation's post to fundraise for it's "Where's the birth certificate?" billboard campaign and promote its petition for the "PUBLIC RELEASE OF BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE."

As Media Matters for America documented:

A May 28 headline on The Fox Nation -- Fox News' purportedly bias-free website -- asked: "Should Obama Release Birth Certificate? Or Is This Old News?" But contrary to The Fox Nation's question, the Obama campaign released a copy of President Obama's birth certificate, posting it on the campaign's Fight the Smears website. It also reportedly provided the original document to FactCheck.org, whose staff concluded in an August 21, 2008, post that it "meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship." The Hawaii Department of Health also repeatedly confirmed that the birth certificate on record with the state is valid and proves that he was born in the state of Hawaii.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by LuvLuLu (May 29, 2009 11:40 am ET)
      6 1
      A Certificate of Live Birth is provided any time after the original birth certificate is created. The State of Hawaii's data clerks take the info from the paper copy in their possession, then create a Certificate of Live Birth from that. It's a certificate guaranteed by the State of Hawaii to be factual and accurate. What more could people want?

      So, WND is bragging that their pushing of a false talking point got airtime elsewhere? See, usually I brag about things one should brag about - for some reason, WND is bragging about something they should be ashamed of.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by latichever (May 29, 2009 12:25 pm ET)
        5 2
        First, he's a citizen--wherever he was born--because his mother was a citizen.

        Second, to believe in the fake certificate, you would have to believe that his mother said, "Someday my African American baby, who won't be accommodated at most business today in much of the country may someday be president, so I better fake him being born here."

        Because he was automatically a citizen, the only motive for a fake certificate--whenever it was faked--would be to qualify as a presidential candidate.

        So you would have to show that any possible fakery would have been done when it looked possible for him to be elected, such as after he became Senator. But not of the conspiracy buffs are saying it was faked that recently.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by michey22 (May 29, 2009 12:49 pm ET)
          1 7
          Umm, Latichever...

          You're wrong. His mother's citizenship was not passed along if he was born abroad, unless she had lived 5 years in the US all after the age of 14. Therefore, she would have had to be 19 years old. She was 18 when she had Barack.

          That was the law then. This is very clear if you research it. And, you don't need to use "birther" websites. You can look up statutes on the internet from all sorts of unbiased, factual sites regarding citizenship requirements.

          This whole debate is so irritating, because the so-called "birthers" just want an answer. The thing posted on FactCheck doesn't cut it (you can look all of that up, too. The certification of live birth can be issued to children of Hawaiian citizen...in order to pass on citizenship status in many cases, although not in Barack's, as previously mentioned.

          If I'm wrong, fine. But, why can't the media just really answer the questions and inquiries of the birth certificate people? Why not answer it head on? Laughing it off, like Gibbs did, is completely disrespectful and only feeds the suspicion that we are trying to be silenced.

          Simple question - why won't BO just release the birth certificate? You know, the one that has your hospital and Dr.'s name, and both parents names? If he is so transparent, why not release it, just like McCain did, and just like everyone does all the time?

          Recognize that we do have a lot to lose, by demanding this, because it is very possible he was born in Hawaii, but has an embarrassing detail (like his real father perhaps) on the certificate. This would backfire on us "birthers", but at least we'd have the truth and not the feeling that our president is usurping the Constitution.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (May 29, 2009 1:15 pm ET)
            4 2
            Truth is, the birth certificate has been posted, and reviewed many times over. The fact is, folks like yourselves fail to recognize it.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by RABBITLUVR (May 29, 2009 1:51 pm ET)
              3 1
              Once again, we have a cabal of lunatics out there who simply cannot and will not ever grasp the fact that, yes, an African-American man has been legally elected POTUS. They simply cannot cope with it so they continue these insane snipes that really do nothing but waste the time of the President, his Administration, and the citizens who want this nation to take a different course.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by LuvLuLu (May 29, 2009 7:37 pm ET)
              2 1
              Truth is the "birth certificate" has not been posted. What has been posted is a "Certificate of Live Birth". It's not exactly the same as a birth certificate. In some states, when you ask for a copy of your birth certificate, they give you an exact copy of the original, and it;s called a birth certificate. In other states, they use the original birth certificate that is saved in their storage vaults to produce a Certificate of Live Birth.

              Hawaii doesn't hand out a Birth Certificate copy when a request comes in. It's not a flaw in the discovery that he only has a Certificate of Live Birth - they use that original document to create the new one, and certify that it's a copy of the data from the original, including the place of his birth.

              This is a non-story.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by MovieFan (May 31, 2009 7:50 am ET)
                 
              A 'Cirtificate of Live Birth' is not a 'Birth Certificate', Hawaii and Alaska both issue those for folks who do not have a birth certificate and need some other document to use in its stead.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by bilbo_dies (May 29, 2009 2:19 pm ET)
            2 1
            Let's see: my "long form" birth certificate was lost somewhere during many different moves. I applied and was given a birth certificate by the state I was born in (S.C.) but; it isn't a long form certificate. Damn, I may not be able to run for president because I might not be a "real" citizen.

            Crap, how many times does the state of Hawaii have to state that they have released, what they are allowed to release, and that Obama does meet the requirements for citizenship. eg he was born in Hawaii.

            Dragging this dead body out of the mud doesn't prove or accomplish anything.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (May 29, 2009 4:53 pm ET)
            3 1
            This whole debate is so irritating, because the so-called "birthers" just want an answer.

            A flat-out lie. You've had your answer from a entire avalanche of respected sources, but since you don't like the answer you just keep asking the question like a three-year-old. So here are four things you can do about it: S. T. F. And U.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (May 29, 2009 6:04 pm ET)
            2 1
            Both local newspapers in Honolulu carried birth announcements for Barack Obama in August of 1961. Here's a link:

            http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/obamabirth.php

            Do you REALLY think that his parents would go to the trouble of submitting fictitious birth announcements in 1961, just in case he ever ran for president?

            You "birthers" are idiots.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by latichever (May 29, 2009 6:32 pm ET)
              3
            It's not as simple or clear as you make it. Here's a couple of statements from the U.S Immigration Service:

            Your text to link here...

            I was born overseas. I believe I was a U.S. citizen at birth because one or both my parents were U.S. citizens when I
            was born. But my birth and citizenship were not registered with the U.S. Embassy when I was born. Can I apply to
            have my citizenship recognized?


            Whether or not someone born outside the United States to a U.S. citizen parent is a U.S. citizen depends on the law in effect when the person was born. These laws have changed over the years, but usually require a combination of the parent being a U.S. citizenwhen the child was born, and the parent having lived in the United States or its possessions for a specific period of time. Derivative citizenship can be quite complex and may require careful legal analysis.

            But more important this:

            I was born overseas. One of my parents was a U.S. citizen but never lived in the United States. One of my grandparents was also a U.S. citizen. Could I have derived U.S. citizenship?


            If your parent was a U.S. citizen when you were born but had not
            lived in the United States for the required amount of time before
            your birth, but one of your grandparents was also a U.S. citizen
            and had already met the residence requirements, then you may stillhave derived U.S. citizenship. The provisions of immigration law that govern derivative citizenship are quite precise and circumstances in individual cases can be complex.

            So, in other words, even if his mother did not meet the residency requirement he would have had derived citizenship based on his grandparents.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by michey22 (May 29, 2009 9:57 pm ET)
                 
              I appreciate your research. In a short time, you have done far more than most people commenting on this site. But, you did write..."If your parent was a U.S. citizen when you were born but had not lived in the United States for the required amount of time before your birth, but one of your grandparents was also a U.S. citizen and had already met the residence requirements, then you MAY still have derived U.S. citizenship. The provisions of immigration law that govern derivative citizenship are quite precise and circumstances in individual cases can be complex."

              You quoted the service as saying MAY. So, don't you think that this should have been publicly and openly resolved? Don't you agree based on your research that it is complex, and should not have been swept under the rug, ridiculed, and scoffed at?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 30, 2009 2:39 am ET)
              1  
              Citizenship may have derived from his grandparents, but not the "natural-born" status, which is why wingnuts are squealing that Obama was not born in the United States.

              Both of your examples start with "I was born overseas." Obama was not "born overseas." Let me type that again, more slowly, so you may understand it:

              B a r a c k O b a m a w a s n o t b o r n o v e r s e a s.

              Hawaii was a state when he was born there. Contemporary birth announcements and the document certified as an offocially valid and factually and legally correct "Certificate of Live Birth" corroborates that statement. So, once again, you beat not only the carcass of a dead horse, but its bones, since the flesh of your bogus argument rotted away months ago.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (May 29, 2009 6:40 pm ET)
            2 1
            It appears that "birther" has become a synonym for "stupid moron".
            Report Abuse
          • Author by LuvLuLu (May 29, 2009 7:30 pm ET)
            3 1
            You're wrong. His mother's citizenship was not passed along if he was born abroad, unless she had lived 5 years in the US all after the age of 14. Therefore, she would have had to be 19 years old. She was 18 when she had Barack.

            So says poster Michey.

            But it's Michey that's wrong. The 'rule' that he mentions above doesn't apply in this case.

            There is a birth certificate in the stores of the State of Hawaii. The State of Hawaii uses those stored birth certificates to create Certificates of Live Birth. On Obama's Certificate of Live Birth, it says that he was born in Hawaii, so it doesn't matter if some Certificates of Live Births don't describe births that happened in Hawaii- Obama's Certificate of Live Birth DOES show that.

            The State of Hawaii doesn't send out "birth certificates" after the fact. They send out "Certificates of Live Birth". So, your 'demand' that he give you the proof you want, proof he cannot provide because the state of Hawaii doesn't send those out, is an unreasonable demand. How weird that you would demand that he either provide what you demand or be damned.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by michey22 (May 29, 2009 10:09 pm ET)
                 
              It's not at all unreasonable. The original birth certificate, if there is one, was not destroyed. The director of vital stats in Hawaii said she has seen it. But, she gave a somewhat elusive statement, and never actually said it was a Hawaiian birth. I grant you that the "Certification" does indicate Honolulu, but that may be an error (you're far less likely to have an error in a handwritten or typewritten original birth certificate), a detail we don't quite understand (like maybe that is where the birth was "certified" not actually the place of birth), or possibly even a forgery. I know, I know what you're all thinking. But none of you can explain why Obama won't just show everyone the original. Don't say "That's not what the State of Hawaii does". He's the president, the whole premise of the certification is that it is created from the original, so an original should exist, so let's see it and stop talking about it.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by seeryer (May 30, 2009 5:38 pm ET)
               
            Come on man. Let it go. Do you not believe that his mother was an American woman enrolled at Hawaii University when she met a graduate student and conceived a child? Does your doubt come from the fact that his father is African, his mother was a "bleeding heart", or this happened in Hawaii and not Kansas? Just support the guy or gal who runs against him in 2012 and quit with this nonsense.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by jonwisby (May 31, 2009 9:52 am ET)
               
            How about the birth announcement in Honolulu newspaper (factcheck.org)? Please tell me how they faked a birth announcement in 1961 (amazing foresight I suppose)?
            Report Abuse
    • Author by OldGaDawg (May 29, 2009 12:49 pm ET)
      2 7
      Count the numbers to whom think that our U.S Constitution has not been satisfied with this issue of Obama's birth certificate? ALL 400,000 PLUS would like to know if he is qualified to serve as our Commander and Chief.
      I personally will not accept him as our President until this issue and others have been brought out to view.
      Mr. Obama is not this county's President - he is however an ILLEGITIMATE President that has not the right to hold this position that he has deceived the American public to gain.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (May 29, 2009 1:15 pm ET)
        5 1
        Wrong. He is President. He was elected fairly, and legally, as he was born in Hawaii. There is nothing to prove.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by michey22 (May 29, 2009 1:23 pm ET)
          2 6
          A challenge for magnolialover, just a bit more difficult than responding with Nurse Ratchet-style one liners:

          Answer the following questions in one sentence.

          1. What is the difference between a "Certification of Live Birth" and a "Birth Certificate". (Clue: Go look at yours, whatever state, and see if it contains as little information as what Obama posted on the Internet.)

          2. Under what circumstances could a child born of Hawaiian parents be issued a "Certification of Live Birth" other than an actual birth within state borders?

          3. Are children of one citizen parent automatically granted citizenship status if born abroad?

          4. Is it common for a presidential candidate to seal his birth records and university records and hire lawyers at the cost of hundreds of thousands to keep them sealed?

          5. What is your favorite flavor of Kool-Aid?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mikehuck1976 (May 29, 2009 4:12 pm ET)
            3 2
            So you actually believe that this man was given presidential security clearance without them investigating whether or not he was even a citizen? You truly believe that? Why do you hate America?

            Report Abuse
          • Author by LuvLuLu (May 29, 2009 7:47 pm ET)
            3 1
            1. When a child is born, a Birth Certificate is issued. One copy of the original goes to the state vaults and another copy typically goes to the parents of the baby. In some states, when one asks for a copy of the Birth Certificate, one gets a "Certificate of Live Birth". That COLB gets all of its info directly from the original that is in the state's vaults. It doesn't have ALL the info that's generally on a Birth Certificate, but it doesn't need to have all that data in order to qualify as proof of name, birthdate, etc. Some states give out identical copies of a Birth Certificate, and others give out COLB's. That does not make COLB's inferior or insufficient. That's where your argument falls flat.

            2. Some COLB's in Hawaii are given for children who are not born in Hawaii apparently. But not Obama's. His COLB says he was born in Hawaii. It says that because he was born in Hawaii, and it says that because that is the info that the State of Hawaii was able to get directly off the original copy that's stored in their vaults! The State of Hawaii officials have already told us that. If you don't know this, it's because you didn't want to hear or read this - that's the only way to have missed that info.

            3. Citizens and natural born citizens are different things, but yes, if you are the child of one American and one parent of non-American heritage, according to US law, you get to decide when you are 18 which country you want to claim allegience to. And you are automatically granted the right to choose to be an American if that's what you want to do! So yeah, you are.

            4. All lies.

            5. None of your business.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Randwulf (May 30, 2009 5:23 pm ET)
                 
              So, forget about the god-damned birth certificate and the COLB. Just have one of Mr. Obama's many lawyers, give us the name of the hospital and the doctor who delivered your baby Obamasiah. I'm so sick of you smartasses with all your smartass comments! It doesn't benefit your pointless argument one bit. You argue like small, spoiled children. Just stop it or go to your rooms! It's really freaking simple. If you are all so sure he was born in Hawaii, then tell us which hospital and have the delivering physician come forward (or just any member of the hospital staff at the time who was there and remembers it or can verify it). I can't believe the hospital isn't being made into a shrine and the doctor hasn't made the talk show circuit. Probably because they don't exist. I'm looking at my BC right now and see the doctor's name, the name of the hospital and the time of birth along with my birth weight, etc., etc.. But forget all that, we will never get to see Obama's original. You know why? Because it doesn't exist and it never did! There may be one in the works, you know, getting aged properly by forgery experts. I can't wait to see what they do about the serial number on it. They (birth certificates) are all issued in sequence you know. But, I digress. Oh, and while we are digressing, what about the records from Occidental College that allegedly show that Mr. Obama (Soetoro?) received foreign student aid while a student there? And what about him traveling to Pakistan when US passport holders were denied entrance there? The real birth certificate of you socialist savior is undoubtedly in the safe deposit box of Bill and Hillary Clinton and was issued by some hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. How else would she have extorted her way into that job? Enjoy!!
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 30, 2009 2:42 am ET)
            2  
            My favorite flavor of Kool-Aid is "GOP Sour grape."
            Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (May 30, 2009 4:13 am ET)
            1 1
            Your questions are too dumb to deal with. You already have my braincells begging for the sweet release of a coma just reading them. I have alternates for YOU

            How did Obama get his birth ANOUNCED in a contemporary Honolulu newspaper. AT THE TIME OF HIS BIRTH if he was NOT born in Hawaii.

            Why did the Director of Health Dr. Chiyome Fukino and the registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, verified the birth certificate?

            http://www.kitv.com/politics/17860890/detail.html

            "Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures," Fukino said.

            Is there ANY level of proof that would satisfy you

            AND

            Which rightwing screechmonkey is doing your thinking for you THIS week?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by seeryer (May 30, 2009 5:42 pm ET)
              1
            1. What is the difference between a "Certification of Live Birth" and a "Birth Certificate". (Clue: Go look at yours, whatever state, and see if it contains as little information as what Obama posted on the Internet.)

            You are a whacko

            2. Under what circumstances could a child born of Hawaiian parents be issued a "Certification of Live Birth" other than an actual birth within state borders?

            You are a whacko

            3. Are children of one citizen parent automatically granted citizenship status if born abroad?

            You are a whacko

            4. Is it common for a presidential candidate to seal his birth records and university records and hire lawyers at the cost of hundreds of thousands to keep them sealed?

            You are a whacko

            5. What is your favorite flavor of Kool-Aid?

            I like blue Gatorade.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by MovieFan (May 31, 2009 7:56 am ET)
             
          His father was a British citizen, so Barry is our first and only British born President - the English have finally won the revolutionary war after two hundred years - “God save the Queen”.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by archae (May 29, 2009 1:16 pm ET)
        4 2
        You still have your "Clinton Chronicles" video?

        The one where Bill Clinton was having dozens of people killed?

        You still believe Obama is a Muslim?

        Or like fellow birther Alan "nuttier than squirrel doo-doo" Keyes, is Obama a "radical communist?" (Keyes' exact words)

        The fact is, what this all boils down to is the birthers are led by grandstanding liars wo are making tons of money from the suckers, anti-Jew nutcases like Andy Martin, bitter old political rivals like Keyes, and flat-out "We don't want that n**** in the White House!" racists.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by michey22 (May 29, 2009 1:36 pm ET)
          1 7
          Ahhhh...the molotov cocktail known as labelling people racists. Yes, it usually only takes 10 or so comments before someone of limited intellect uses it. It's just so easy, isn't it? Too hard to resist.

          Does it make any sense to you at all (any at all) that we "racists" love and hail Alan Keyes and don't trust Obama as far as we can throw him? Did you notice that Keyes is African-American too? Or, are you one of those racists that doesn't recognize "blackness", unless liberal is their state of mind? Don't you see how disgusting your point of view is?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by RABBITLUVR (May 29, 2009 2:46 pm ET)
            4 1
            What about those racist signs at the teabagger orgies? Care to explain those?

            Alan Keyes? Funny, but I don't hear the white righty talkers even mentioning him so I wonder how much 'luv' there really is for Keyes from your side.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 30, 2009 2:47 am ET)
              1  
              What about those racist signs at the teabagger orgies? Care to explain those?
              (crickets)
              Report Abuse
          • Author by archae (May 29, 2009 3:52 pm ET)
            1  
            I didn't describe *YOU* as a racist.
            But racists are in the ranks of these "birthers."
            "Stormfront," the neo-Nazi web site claims Obama was born in Kenya.

            And you "love and hail" Alan Keyes? Why?
            He's a liar, a religious fruitcake, fake Christian, and grandstander.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (May 29, 2009 6:08 pm ET)
            1 1
            Does it make any sense to you at all (any at all) that we "racists" love and hail Alan Keyes and don't trust Obama as far as we can throw him?

            That's because Alan Keyes is a sell-out Uncle Tom, and Barack Obama is an intelligent man that you feel vastly inferior to.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by michey22 (May 29, 2009 10:14 pm ET)
                 
              HEY RABBITLUVR, CHECK THIS OUT FROM WZWRITER!!!!

              You want to see racism? Look at what this guy called Alan Keyes - a sell-out Uncle Tom. I never saw anything like that at any tea parties, I'll tell you. If you did, I guarantee you the person was hunted down by left-wing media to be photographed and interviewed so as to disparage the rest of us.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by RABBITLUVR (May 29, 2009 1:54 pm ET)
        3  
        That's cool. You do not HAVE to accept a single damn thing. Don't like Obama being President? There's the door... leave. I don't want your kind in my country anyway. F'in phony patriots who wrap themselves in the flag and go 'rah-rah' and dodge military service to boot.

        Just take your lies, smears, and hate and go.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (May 29, 2009 4:57 pm ET)
        1 1
        ALL 400,000 PLUS would like to know if he is qualified to serve as our Commander and Chief.

        Meanwhile, the remaining 300.6 MILLION of us (see? I can shout too, General Forrest!) already know the answer and are perfectly content with it, whether we like it or not! So you can join micheyIQof22 in the STFU corner...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 30, 2009 2:45 am ET)
        2  
        Wow, OldGadawg, you must be correct, because your post is all in bold font. But mine is in italic bold font, so I must be even more correct when I post that you are full of it.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jonwisby (May 31, 2009 9:57 am ET)
           
        Your ignorance is either falsely motivated or beyond redemption.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ReasonAndResolve (May 29, 2009 1:29 pm ET)
      3 1
      Do any of us really believe that this issue will ever go away?

      No matter how much proof is produced, these fine Americans will always find some excuse for questioning the legitimacy of President Obama - never mind that most Americans are satisfied and the majority of voters chose Barack Obama.

      They obviously hate democracy - and, by extension, they hate America.

      Fortunately, they represent a very small minority, but their attacks are just a bloodless form of terrorism attacking the foundations of our democracy.

      I recently tried an overlay of the map of states that have scored a failing grade in education (as supplied by the USDOE) with a map of red states v blue states from the last election. Is it really any wonder at all that the maps are nearly identical?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by michey22 (May 29, 2009 2:09 pm ET)
        1 6
        Try your map game overlaying educational outcomes and counties, instead of states. You'll see a much different picture, and if open-minded enough, you'll recognize that the more liberal the county, the less educated the children become. But, then again, this serves the liberal interests - a dumb-downed society unaware of our rights, responsibilities, and founding principles that will continue to slavishly elect democrats, no matter the outcomes of their big government programs.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bilbo_dies (May 29, 2009 2:38 pm ET)
          2 1
          "the more liberal the county, the less educated the children become."


          Gee, I like this one.

          "Among adults age 25 to 34, the U.S. is ninth among industrialized nations in the share of its population that has at least a high school degree."

          "Top performers included Finland, Korea, the Netherlands, Japan, Canada and Belgium."

          Granted this is from a study by "Organization for Cooperation and Development. The 30-nation organization develops the yearly rankings as a way for countries to evaluate their education systems and determine whether to change their policies" And I can't verify their findings but; I think Finland is a pretty liberal country. Other than that, I believe the education system does not depend on whether a country is liberal or not but; whether the people of that country place a high emphasis on education.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ReasonAndResolve (May 29, 2009 2:55 pm ET)
            2  
            Every one of those countries is a socialist democracy, too.

            There really is no way the conservatives can win this argument.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 30, 2009 2:51 am ET)
            1  
            Poor michey22. I guess even masochists post on this site. He must be one, because he is being beaten mercilessly, and still comes back for more.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by ReasonAndResolve (May 29, 2009 2:56 pm ET)
          1 1
          Tragically, there doesn't seem to be any data available to allow that sort of comparison, so I will have to leave it to your imagination.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by RABBITLUVR (May 29, 2009 3:12 pm ET)
          1  
          http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/ap/news/state/pennsylvania/20090529_ap_panewspaperadcallsforobamaassassination.html

          Good to see that the Red County educational systems are up to scratch when it comes to history...
          Report Abuse
        • Author by ReasonAndResolve (May 29, 2009 3:29 pm ET)
          1  
          And, if open-minded enough, you will recognize that those states that have the highest concentration of college graduates are ALL blue states. Coincidence?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (May 29, 2009 6:09 pm ET)
            1  
            And the states with the highest concentration of married cousins are ALL red states.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (May 30, 2009 4:22 am ET)
          1  
          REALLY? Why is it that Harvard and Stanford to of the best universities in the country are in suburbs of two of the most liberal CITIES in the country Boston and San Fransisco? I think you are full of it.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by OldGaDawg (May 29, 2009 1:49 pm ET)
        6
      Count the numbers to whom think that our U.S Constitution has not been satisfied with this issue of Obama's birth certificate? ALL 400,000 PLUS would like to know if he is qualified to serve as our Commander and Chief.
      I personally will not accept him as our President until this issue and others have been brought out to view.
      Mr. Obama is not this county's President - he is however an ILLEGITIMATE President that has not the right to hold this position that he has deceived the American public to gain.


      Obama - If you have nothing to hide? Then show the simple papers and life can go on....
      But until - as I've stated above:

      ILLEGITIMATE President
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ReasonAndResolve (May 29, 2009 2:16 pm ET)
        2 1
        I wonder, in all of your research, if you have ever checked to see how thoroughly a US Senator or a US President is investigated before they are given access to Top Secret (or even, merley "Classified") documents.

        I can assure you that Obama has been completely investigated to ensure that he is a US citizen.

        The issue has been completely resolved. Also, 400,000 represents less than 1% of the population of this country. It is reassuring to me that we haven't created very many people who are entirely unclear on the concept of democracy and free elections.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by RABBITLUVR (May 29, 2009 3:18 pm ET)
          2 1
          Look, the nitwit above you is hopeless. Even the nutjob talkers have moved on from this nonissue.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ReasonAndResolve (May 29, 2009 3:30 pm ET)
            2 1
            But isn't it reassuring to know that they really are irrelevant?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by archae (May 29, 2009 3:47 pm ET)
            2 1
            Not all of them.

            WingNutDaily and Fox (har har) "news" are still beating this dead horse.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by RABBITLUVR (May 29, 2009 3:56 pm ET)
              2 1
              True. I meant Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, etc. But WND and Fox, of course, they will keep it up... laughable as it is.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by kelmark2180 (May 29, 2009 3:56 pm ET)
          1 4
          I'm one of about 10% in this country who served in our military. Like the president, I took an oath; "To the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States". The Constitution requires the president to be a Natural Born Citizen. Now it is time for BHO to prove that he meets the requirements of our constitution and in place of hiding his birth certificate, he can show it to the world. All I have seen so far is smoke, mirrors and lawyers to keep it under lock and key.

          Since only one in ten has taken this oath, am I to assume the other nine could care less about our constitution? Sadly, it looks that way to me.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by ReasonAndResolve (May 29, 2009 4:23 pm ET)
            3 1
            Have you ever been investigated for a Top Secret clearance? I have - and so is every US Senator and US President. If Barack Obama wasn't a US citizen, this would have been uncovered more than four years ago when he was elected to the Senate.

            Your argument has no merit.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by eweston8542983 (May 29, 2009 7:01 pm ET)
              3 1
              The lowest security clearence used by the Feds is NOFORN, no foreign national. This clearence can take a year or longer to get. It is the lowest clearence and by no means a gimme.
              So if you concerned citizens think there's a problem here, send you opinions straight to the people who gave the clearence. Which would be the FBI.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by progressiveright (May 29, 2009 4:46 pm ET)
            4 1
            I took that oath also and here is more info for you read my response to OldGaDawg and you will find out he has been vetted all ready for this. If you supported the Constitution do you believe Bush was a criminal?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (May 29, 2009 4:48 pm ET)
            4 1
            Asked and answered, flyboy. About a million times over...

            Just because certain knuckle-dragging knuckleheads keep asking the question over and over like a spoiled three-year-old doesn't mean it hasn't been answered. So grow up already!...
            Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (May 29, 2009 6:11 pm ET)
            3 1
            Yet another stupid post by someone with numbers after their name. Is that YOU, Rino Hunter????
            Report Abuse
          • Author by LuvLuLu (May 29, 2009 7:51 pm ET)
            3 1
            The problem is that you think that he's withholding evidence by not showing you his birth certificate. He doesn't get one - Hawaii uses the original birth certificate to produce a Certificate of Live Birth.

            They don't give out another Birth Certificate. They only give out a Certificate of Live Birth.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by LuvLuLu (May 30, 2009 2:02 pm ET)
                 
              Not only do we have some real nincompoop's on this thread, but we also have a drive-by downrater, as if that really affects any of our self esteem or worth.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by progressiveright (May 29, 2009 4:42 pm ET)
        2 1
        By the way a canadate for president is checked out for all Constitutional before his or her name can appear on any ballot in the contry. So if Obama was not a natural born citizen that is when it would have been found out. It is illeagal to put a person on the ballot for an office they cannot legealy hold.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by progressiveright (May 29, 2009 4:42 pm ET)
        2 1
        By the way a canadate for president is checked out for all Constitutional before his or her name can appear on any ballot in the contry. So if Obama was not a natural born citizen that is when it would have been found out. It is illeagal to put a person on the ballot for an office they cannot legealy hold.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 30, 2009 2:57 am ET)
        2  
        Count the numbers to whom think (sic) that our U.S Constitution has not been satisfied with this issue of Obama's birth certificate? (sic)
        You end an ungrammatical, non-question with a question mark. Very strange. And shouting does not make it more valid.

        Also, you have not provided a scintill of evidence as to the existence of this fanciful 400,000 people who exist only as voices in your head. Until you do, we'll just continue to talk to you slowly and quietly, and insist that you seek psychological help. It's for your own good. really.

        And, the simple documents have been shown. It isn't our fault that you can't comprehend them.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (May 29, 2009 10:58 pm ET)
      2  
      I believe we have a serial down thumber on site. Could be a thumb sucker unless its D. Morris.
      Snoopy has accused Miss Dee. Is it you deer?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by devin (May 29, 2009 11:20 pm ET)
         
      pathetic, this issue, this celebration. This has never been an issue on its own merits, it is a created issue, one based on one faulty assumption after another. People are so deep into it, to question these faulty assumptions would be to question themselves and all that led them to chase this canard. They won't do it.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.