About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Newsbusters wants media to call Tiller "controversial"

June 01, 2009 3:52 pm ET by Jamison Foser

Newsbusters' Kyle Drennan complains that a CBS Early Show report on the assassination of Dr. George Tiller didn't describe Tiller as "controversial":

CBS 'Early Show' Sees No Controversy in Tiller's Work As 'Abortion Provider'

By Kyle Drennen (Bio | Archive)

June 1, 2009 - 11:43 ET

Reporting on the murder of Kansas abortion doctor, George Tiller, on Monday's CBS Early Show, correspondent Jeff Glor touted the doctor's career, while not depicting it as controversial ...

The Early Show coverage made no mention of Tiller's controversial career, including a recent investigation into whether he conducted 19 illegal partial-birth abortions.

First of all, Tiller was acquitted of any wrongdoing related to the 19 late-term abortions. Drennan didn't mention that little detail, which pretty much tells you everything you need to know about his honesty.

Now, let's look at the article Drennan links to in support of his description of Tiller as "controversial." It's a Kansas City Star "timeline of major events in George Tiller's career." The first entry is the 1986 bombing of Tiller's clinic. The second is the 1991 blockade of his clinic by anti-choice protesters, leading to more than 2,500 arrests. The third is the 1993 shooting in which Tiller was hit in both arms. His assailant was sentenced to 11 years in prison for the shooting, and 20 more for her involvement in arson attacks against clinics in three states. The fourth entry is a 1998 letter Tiller received threatening to contaminate his clinic with Anthrax. The fifth is another illegal protest outside Tiller's clinic. The sixth and seventh are proceedings that found no wrongdoing by Tiller. And that's it; that's the whole list.

So, basically, Drennen's evidence - he chose this list, not me - contains zero examples of Tiller doing anything illegal. It contains zero examples of Tiller doing anything "controversial," unless you count "getting shot" as "doing something controversial."  It does, however, list right-wing nutcases shooting and threatening Tiller, and illegally blocking access to his clinic.  But that doesn't demonstrate that Tiller was "controversial"; it simply demonstrates that criminals and thugs tried to stop him from legally doing his job.

Drennen's complaint that CBS didn't call Tiller "controversial" is just bizarre. In fact, many news reports have described Tiller that way, and I find it more than a little off-putting. Tiller didn't break any laws. He just showed up to work every day, despite threats of violence, intimidation tactics, and even a previous shooting. He showed up, risking his own life every day, and he performed legal procedures that saved patients' lives. That's what doctors are supposed to do.

Calling Tiller "controversial" just because because conservative anti-abortion terrorists tried to, and finally did, kill him is insulting, and suggests some justification for the assassination. Calling him "controversial" blames the victim.  Drennen's complaints that CBS didn't offer such justification for Tiller's assassination is creepy, at best.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by o rly (June 01, 2009 4:53 pm ET)
         
      Newsbusters - the evil twin of Media Matters for America.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by thebewilderness (June 01, 2009 5:42 pm ET)
      1  
      Funny they don't call the organizations that target women controversial.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (June 01, 2009 10:38 pm ET)
        1  
        No. They defend those organizations.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by goshzilla (June 02, 2009 1:06 am ET)
        1  
        You mean Operation Taliban? No wait Operation Rescue, it's hard to distinguish which one hates women or medical science more.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by LuvLuLu (June 01, 2009 11:29 pm ET)
      3 1
      The real offensive comments are the ones like what Bill O'Reilly did here, and others have continued to do.....

      Saying that a legal medical procedure is murder.

      Saying that he was "Tiller the baby killer", when no babies were ever killed. They aren't babies and they weren't killed.

      Saying that he's controversial for performing life saving or mental health saving medical procedures.

      Saying that he's a killer for aborting non-viable fetuses or viable fetuses that have horrific birth defects.

      Bill O'Reilly's guest tonight try to say 'well, Tiller was found not guilty, but that doesn't mean he wasn't guilty, it just means that the it wasn't proven to the jury that he was guilty.'

      In some cases, that kind of logic works. OJ Simpson, for example, was clearly guilty and was found not guilty by a lazy and inept jury. Tiller, on the other hand, was charged in error and the evidence clearly showed that he had taken all the legal steps necessary. The only reason it looked suspicous was because of the terroristic threats that the secondary doctor had to protect himself from!

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.