About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

MSNBC's Pat Buchanan laughs about his support for white supremacist

June 02, 2009 7:03 pm ET by Jamison Foser

On Hardball tonight, Pat Buchanan noted that he supported Nixon Supreme Court nominee Harrold Carswell:

CHRIS MATTHEWS: How well does she [Sonia Sotomayor] compare to Howard [sic] Carswell?

BUCHANAN: Harrold Carswell? I would think probably she's right in the same league, Chris.

MATTHEWS (laughing): Pat, that's an insult, and you know it. That -- Lawrence --

BUCHANAN (laughing): I supported Carswell!

Buchanan not only supported Carswell when Nixon nominated him in 1970, he continues to defend Carswell against charges of racism. In a 2005 column, Buchanan claimed "Liberals smeared Nixon nominees [Clement] Haynesworth and Carswell as racists."

Now, where ever would anyone have gotten the idea that Harrold Carswell was a racist? Maybe from a speech Carswell gave at an American Legion gathering in which he said: "I believe that segregation of the races is proper ... and the only practical and correct way of life in our states. I yield to no man in the firm, vigorous belief in the principles of white supremacy and I shall always be so governed."

Yeah, that's probably it.

When that speech was uncovered, Carswell did his best to pretend he didn't stand by it. But his judicial record cast doubt on those claims:

While he was a district judge, 60% of his 23 civil rights decisions were reversed by the Fifth Circuit Court. In 1963, he dismissed a complaint on behalf of blacks who were trying to attend a Tallahassee theater; the Circuit Court reversed his ruling with the biting comment, "These orders are clearly in error."

...

[I]n a suit to desegregate the faculty of a formerly all-black school near Pensacola, Carswell reasoned that the Supreme Court's desegregation decisions in 1954 and 1955 referred only to students, not to faculty.

After becoming a circuit-court judge, he joined in granting a desegregation delay to five Southern states. It was a decision tacitly endorsed by Nixon's Southern strategist, John Mitchell. In mid-January, as Carswell and Mitchell were dining and discussing the impending appointment, the Supreme Court reversed Carswell's decision and told the states to desegregate by Feb. 1.

And to this day, Pat Buchanan defends Carswell -- who supported segregation and boasted of his belief in "white supremacy" -- from charges of racism, and laughs about his support for Carswell.

Pat Buchanan is perhaps the best-known bigot in America. He called Martin Luther King Jr. "one of the most divisive men in contemporary history." He called Adolf Hitler "an individual of great courage" and wrote a column questioning whether World War II was "worth it" and wondered, "[W]hy destroy Hitler?" He defends a self-proclaimed white supremacist from charges of racism. Nearly every day, he demonstrates contempt for women and minorities.

MSNBC's continued employment of him says a lot about the cable channel.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by christopher howard (June 02, 2009 10:01 pm ET)
      4  
      I also remember Buchanan being extremely chummy with David Duke on television years back. I remember him once saying something to the effect that there were no substantive disagreements between him and Duke.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mrhebert74 (June 03, 2009 12:36 am ET)
      4  
      Rachel Maddow didn't back down from criticizing "MSNBC's own Pat Buchanan" over his attack on Sonia Sotomayor tonight. That says something about the network as well.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MM_JF (June 03, 2009 7:54 am ET)
        4  
        Yes: They employ both racists and non-racists. They must be proud of the "balance" they have attained.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Scientific (June 03, 2009 10:58 am ET)
           
        I think he's pretty much dead to Rachel. She had him on in the early days of her show quite often, and last night, her contempt was clearly visible. Honestly, the guy's openly racist - how can MSNBC continue to ignore that key fact? Fire him and send him on to Fox News where he belongs.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by JimInTheBay (June 03, 2009 9:01 am ET)
      2  
      While people like Buchanan continue to sensationalize trivial minutiae, continue to push the agitprop button and continue their attempts to take our eyes from the larger message there are quite a few liberals and progressives asking "if he wants to frame the debate shouldnt he at least ask permission? after all his side lost didnt they?"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (June 03, 2009 11:39 am ET)
         
      The crazy thing is though: Over the past 8 years Buchanan has sounded like the voice of reason on the right. Shows you how far off the deep end the Cons have really gone.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seeryer (June 03, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
         
      Maybe they keep him around so they can continue to pull the Pat Buchanan card when anyone questions their "balance". "Were not a liberal station, we have Pat Buchanan on all day for cripes sake". I personally don't mind Pat Buchanan. MSNBC could replace him with Tom Tancredo. I don't agree with his opinions but I find him entertaining on MSNBC. Come on people, doesn't it get pretty lame listening to MSNBC talking heads agree all friggin day? I think he represents a dying breed in America. I think the last two elections confirm that. I do not think he is a racist as much as I think he sometimes thinks he is still working for Nixon and it is 1969.
      Report Abuse