I appreciate the NY Times being so candid about what's wrong with the piece, but weren't these flaws serious enough so that the whole piece should have been kicked back for re-working? I mean, was there any time-sensitivity to the piece? Did it absolutely have to go out immediately?
I'll raise the grade of the editors to D- for this correction, but this whole piece really should have been kicked back to the author(s) for serious re-thinking and re-working before being released.