Tucker Carlson sets the standard for disingenuous commentary
June 08, 2009 1:13 pm ET by Jamison Foser
From today's Washington Post online discussion:
Tucker Carlson: "Wise Latina" is such a trendy/phony/stupid formulation, too. What does it mean exactly?
[...]
"What does [wise latina] mean exactly?": It means she thinks she is wise, due in part to growing up a poor female minority. Why is that so hard to understand?
Tucker Carlson: Why does that make a person wiser than having grown up a middle-class Italian? Or a working class Greek? Or a rich Dane? The whole idea is so stupid it shocks me that people say things like that in public. I'd love to hear a real explanation of the theory.
Tucker Carlson knows perfectly well that Sotomayor was saying that, in discrimination cases, a minority who has experienced discrimination may have greater wisdom on the topic than a white male who has not. And he knows perfectly well that, whether you agree with Sotomayor or not, there is nothing particularly controversial about her contention. So rather than argue with it directly -- rather than arguing that he, a wealthy white man, understands discrimination every bit as well as a minority woman -- he pretends she was speaking more broadly than she was, and pretends that he really wants an explanation. He doesn't. He knows what she meant. He's just afraid to confront it directly.
Carlson's love affair with straw men and his commitment to disingenuous arguments is a shame, really. In many ways, he's more willing than most media figures to criticize his own "team." But it's impossible to take him seriously when he regularly behaves this way.

















He also sets the standard for "Shorthand Journalism"
A common tool used by anyone who works for FIX News.
"The wise latina comment is basically the same as when a woman judge says that she probably has a better understanding of the victims point of view, compared to a male judege, if the victim is a 13 year old rape victim."
The only difference being that Sotomayor was talking about being a minority, so you can slam her for her comments and call her racist and be able to get away with it.
How much does the WAPO pay you to do these online chats? You have to be the most unseen and unquoted Pundit in DC. How do you eat? Oh yeah, your mom is an heiress to Swanson Foods. I have a question for you Tucker, would you hope the richness of your experiences would help you come to a better conclusion than someone who had not had those experiences in a situation involving, I don't know, lets go with RAPE? Do you understand now? Or do you feel this way about everythig:"After four years I had met a lot of interesting people, gone to a couple of classes and restored a motorcycle and that was it. And so I wasted my time at college." You have had everything in life given to you or passed down to you, including a "career" in journalism. It never hurts if ole Daddy used to be the head of the CPB?
Makes you wonder how a person who is perpetually confused by practically everything could hold down a job at all.
Oh, right!