About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Yawn, Drudge Report claim proves to be bogus

June 16, 2009 4:44 pm ET by Eric Boehlert

Admit it, you'd be shocked if anything were the case, right?

From Drudge's comical, hyperventilating claim about ABC's planned prime-time health care special [emphasis added]:

ABCNEWS anchor Charlie Gibson will deliver WORLD NEWS from the Blue Room of the White House.

The network plans a primetime special -- 'Prescription for America' -- originating from the East Room, exclude opposing voices on the debate.

From Kerry Smith, senior vice president, ABC News:

ABC News announced plans to broadcast a primetime hour from the White House devoted to exploring and probing the President's position and giving voice to questions and criticisms of that position.

This is the latest example of a unique brand of media criticism that conservatives have perfected -- the pre-emptive critique. Drudge and company have no idea what the substance of ABC's special will look or sound like, but they've already decided it's a crime against journalism.

As if they could even recognize the craft.

UPDATE: The right-wing reaction to Drudge's falsehood remains priceless. Suddenly, ABC News is "state controlled."

You can't make this stuff up.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by seeryer (June 16, 2009 5:15 pm ET)
      2  
      Drudge has become totally irrelevant. I think even the beltway insiders realize it. But not Rush, it is all he pays attention to. When Rush passes on, Drudge will be done.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by flounder (June 16, 2009 5:44 pm ET)
      2  
      Somebody better tell Bush's best friend Bob Schieffer.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (June 16, 2009 5:55 pm ET)
      1 9
      The GOP asked to be included in the program and were denied - by ABC. It's a free promotion of Obama's proposals - ABC will promote the show, and dissenting political views have been denied. If there was any objectivity to it, they would bill it as an 'infomercial,' and charge the DNC for the air time.
      The MSM is 'in the tank' for Obama. ABC never was worth watching, but certainly is now only a discredit to the idea of journalism.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by steeve (June 16, 2009 6:27 pm ET)
        6  
        Glad to hear that you never saw "path to 9/11". Avoid that liberal media at all costs.

        I would suggest that we only hear dissent from people who haven't already been repeatedly and catastrophically wrong. If such dissenters don't exist, it's not our problem.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pags2 (June 16, 2009 6:43 pm ET)
        5  
        The major media news outlets ignored the Dems who voted against the Iraq war. These same media outlets were embedded with the troops. The war coverage was one long continuous infomercial for the Bush/Republican administration to justify their lies.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mk3872 (June 16, 2009 7:13 pm ET)
        2  
        Hey, Ed, show me the proof that ABC DENIED the GOP!!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by seeryer (June 16, 2009 7:18 pm ET)
        3  
        Can you at least watch it before you go off on it? The Republicans will be represented, Obama will invite a few. This is just the RNC trying to be relevant when they are not. And you fall for it, just like they knew you would. What a friggin tool.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by harley (June 16, 2009 8:29 pm ET)
        5  
        Ed = teabagging terrorist hypocrite

        Remember when Fox News Channel's resident Monchichi Brett Baier did a whole thing from "inside the White House"? O'Reilly, too. And then there were all of those Bush White House press releases that FOX News Channel aired verbatim.

        But since Drudge is making a big pee-pee dance about this, expect all of the press to soon follow -- despite reality.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by neon desert (June 17, 2009 10:25 am ET)
          1  
          Saw "pee-pee dance" over on Crooks and Liars - fell in love with the phrase immediately. Creates such a vivid and appropriate mental image that I think it deserves to be the next big thing, right behind text smiley faces. :-)
          Report Abuse
      • Author by LuvLuLu (June 17, 2009 3:32 pm ET)
           
        Hey Ed,

        What makes you think that the RNC should be able to choose who the dissenting voices ABC puts on the air?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (June 16, 2009 6:01 pm ET)
      1 9
      As I read the critique of Drudge, I couldn't help but wonder how MMFA concluded that it was a 'Bogus' claim. ABC has been asked by the GOP for equal time or to be included, and ABC denied the request.
      There is no journalistic integrity in view at ABC in this deal. This is shameful.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by flounder (June 16, 2009 6:29 pm ET)
        5  
        I missed the part where everytime Obama does something you have to include Republicans. Obama won dude, he's president.
        Your whining sounds about getting cut out because you lose elections is the "soft bigotry of low expectations" crap that conservatives always accuse liberals of supporting.
        "Every kids gets a medal! Even last place."
        Why don't you go hang out with the Green Party or the Constitution Party and complain about how you can never get on TV.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (June 16, 2009 11:18 pm ET)
          1 4
          A real debate on an issue allows for dissent. I don't really care if the GOP gets on the 'show' or not. I didn't get a converter box because TV is mostly irrelevant. I get all the news I need from the internet. If ABC had any gonads, they wouldn't be toadying up to Obama. They are irrelevant.
          I understand that if a liberal wins, he only represents that minority as he governs - that's another difference between patriots and Democrats - a patriot will try to be president to all Americans. Of course, that concept is foreign to the Cretans who dwell at MMFA.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (June 16, 2009 11:29 pm ET)
            1  
            a patriot will try to be president to all Americans. Of course, that concept is foreign to the Cretans who dwell at MMFA(Edross)

            You still haven't shown any evidence of the GOP asking to be included. The entire party wants to be on the program? Who asked and was denied? Do you think every debate on tv should include anybody in the country who wants to be on tv? Do you think "being a president to all Americans" involves giving in to every demand by every crackpot out there?

            You really need to think these things through, or provide some backup for your crazy claims.

            And it's "cretin".
            Report Abuse
            • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (June 16, 2009 11:55 pm ET)
                3
              This morning I read the letter from the RNC requesting to be included, and the letter from ABC denying the request.
              And I meant Cretan, not cretin. It's an allusion from the Bible, probably too arcane for the Cretans who dwell in the darkness of this site.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Brabantio (June 17, 2009 12:29 am ET)
                1  
                Assuming that the Biblical reference was a genuine criticism of all Cretans and not a formulation of the liar paradox, right.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (June 17, 2009 2:23 am ET)
                1  
                So you were referring to natives of the Greek isle of Crete who frequent this site? I suppose the job of the American president would technically be foreign to Cretans, but what an odd thing to say. A bit crazy.

                About as believable as your story about getting a letter (still not provided) from the RNC (previously the GOP).

                Again, do you have anything to back up the meat of your complaint? You can leave out any arcane and irrelevant Biblical references, it might help make your point more clear.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 17, 2009 8:17 am ET)
                     
                  So you were referring to natives of the Greek isle of Crete who frequent this site?
                  Colonel, he deserves a D Minos for that attempt at covering up.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (June 17, 2009 2:59 pm ET)
                       
                    Yeah, that's always a laugh when the wingnuts assume we're as gullible as they are. That was pretty weak.
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by Tbone Slickens (June 17, 2009 9:57 am ET)
                 
              Let me help him out my Kentucky Fried Friend, if I may.

              ABC's response to RNC

              While I could not find the actual RNC letter, the response should suffice.

              HuffPo has more on it. Notice how ABC says they will HAND PICK the audience!? Sound familiar?????

              HuffPo
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Disputed Zone (June 17, 2009 12:18 pm ET)
                1  
                No. If it was Obama hand picking the audience you'd have something. But no.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (June 17, 2009 3:12 pm ET)
                   
                Familiar? I guess so, wouldn't it make sense that this program, like any other, decides who will be on their show? Who do you think should select the audience, ESPN?

                I found the RNC letter you were tryng to use as support, took a little link-clicking, but this is from that letter;

                ...In the absence of opposition, I am concerned this event will become a glorified infomercial to promote the Democrat agenda....

                Maybe the fact that the chairman of the RNC can't properly spell the name of the President's party was a factor.I don't mind ABC weeding out illiterates. Again, my question to Edross above, do you think there should be some sort of law that requires a tv network to allow anybody in the world who asks to appear on their programs ? Do you really want to see very stupid people asking questions?

                Never mind, I think I know the answer to that.Look at the level you've dragged this thread down to.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by LuvLuLu (June 17, 2009 3:31 pm ET)
                   
                Yeah, so where is the denial by ABC to allow dissenting voices on this program?

                What makes the RNC think they have the right to choose who the dissenting voices are going to be?
                Report Abuse
          • Author by harley (June 16, 2009 11:47 pm ET)
            2  
            - a patriot will try to be president to all Americans.


            So, by your "definition", herr dubyah wasn't a Patriot. Thanks for admitting that.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (June 17, 2009 9:39 am ET)
               
            By that definition, I guess Bush was even less of a Patriot. He not only did not govern to the benefit of "all americans" but he championed an even smaller minority.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by seeryer (June 16, 2009 7:22 pm ET)
        2  
        What should ABC do to make you happy? You do not even know what the show will look like. Give us a what should happen instead of this fake outrage.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (June 16, 2009 11:34 pm ET)
          1 3
          If they were able to recognize it, they could try journalistic integrity. But they all have too many thrills running up their legs to actually do journalism. They might start by asking Obama to define the "health-care crisis." They might ask him what has been the primary driver of the increasing cost of health-care over the last twenty years. (Answer: governmental programs.)
          But they won't. They probably won't ask any real questions, and they for sure won't ask any follow-ups that might prove difficult to answer. Sycophants make poor journalists.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 17, 2009 8:19 am ET)
               
            You have no proof that they will not do any of that. You're slamming the show before it exists.

            And, by the way, your response to this post is stupid and ill-informed. See? Two can play that game.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (June 17, 2009 9:44 am ET)
            2  
            What BS. According to you guys the gov't is always what drives up the cost, while you champion the free market as a way to drive costs down. You FAIL micro-econ 101. Health costs have been on the rise due to basic market forces: DEMAND increasing (largly due to an agining population and increasingly unhelathy lifestyles for eveyone on average) coupled with relatively static, or slowly growing supply, all against a backdrop of 40-Million people not paying for care they recieve because they show up in the ER on death's door and run up 10's of thousands od bills and then don;t pay. Millions WITH insuracne do the same thing - 75% of all medical bankrupcies are people WITH coverage. This is MARKET FORCES and CORPORATE GREED. The gov't has had litle to do with driving up Health Care costs. That's patently absurd.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck1976 (June 18, 2009 5:59 pm ET)
                 
              Thank you, Nice Guy. Nice to see someone else took Macroeconomics. Perhaps it was not offered at the University of Crete.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by seeryer (June 17, 2009 9:45 am ET)
               
            Lets talk about it after it airs. Instead of talking about what Drudge says is going to air? Deal.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by loonz (June 16, 2009 8:11 pm ET)
        4  
        Why do you guys care anyway? Any News outside of FOX is considered liberal to you guys.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by HughG (June 16, 2009 10:15 pm ET)
        1  
        Ummm...please reread it. Pay attention to the boldfaced type. It's there to make comprehension easy for you.

        Drudge didn't simply claim that the GOP had been excluded (which is not necessarily true; watch the show, or the reporting thereof, to find out); Drudge claimed that ABC was "excluding opposing voices." But ABC says that it plans to include criticisms of Obama's position.

        Criticisms = opposing voices.

        See how easy that is? You've quite welcome.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (June 16, 2009 11:45 pm ET)
            3
          I read the letter from the RNC requesting to be included, and the letter from ABC denying the request. Criticisms may be adversarial, or not.
          ABC is prejudging what criticisms they will give air time to. There is a measure of editorial responsibility in that. But to refuse the major opposition party a voice is beyond the pale of editorial duty and has crossed over into prejudicial advocacy.
          The GOP is the relevant adversarial voice. Their request to be included has been denied. The newsies at ABC are Obama's toadies.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by harley (June 16, 2009 11:49 pm ET)
            1  
            The GOP is the relevant adversarial voice.


            Wrong. The GOPigs are angry, vile, irrelevant anti-Americans who offer no alternative. You and your perverse party are a permanent minority status. Suck it up.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (June 17, 2009 12:07 am ET)
              1 6
              How about the alternative of keeping their piggie little hands out of my wallet! How about the alternative of freedom? How about the alternative of allowing doctors to practice medicine instead of filling out stupid, irrelevant, non-productive medicare forms? How about the government recognizing the constitutional limits that it was founded under? How about not putting our medical welfare in the hands of incompetent bureaucrats?
              National health care is socialism. Socialism is anti-American. This nation was founded on the concept of limited government, not bureaucratic tyranny. How perverse is it that you think that freedom is "no alternative?"
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Brabantio (June 17, 2009 1:05 am ET)
                5  
                Indeed, do not burden me with the tyrannical yoke of health care. How would I possibly handle preventive treatment instead of reveling in the potential financial challenge of serious illness? Nay, I cast aside these heavy chains! I live free in my lack of medical care, for the alternative is be labeled as unpatriotic by wild-eyed partisan conservatives! Such stigma could not be lifted as easily as chronic malady could through righteous Christian prayer. And so those who foolishly attempt to shackle us with public medical care shall quake at the gargantuan shadow cast by those who rise against them, as we stand tall and our cry of "FREEDOM" echoes throughout this great land!
                Report Abuse
                • Author by neon desert (June 17, 2009 10:37 am ET)
                  1  
                  *sniff*

                  ...really, just a little dust in my eye... *sniff*
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by harley (June 17, 2009 7:34 am ET)
                3  
                National health care is socialism. Socialism is anti-American.


                1. Prove it
                2. You should be outraged by your fellow GOPig teabaggers in the house and senate that accept lifelong 'socialism/National'. Your GOPigs are so anti-American.

                Only a terrorist that hates our country would believe giving health care to all citizens is "anti-American". You really are a despicable, hateful, anti-American. Thanks for proving that,
                Report Abuse
              • Author by mikehuck1976 (June 18, 2009 6:01 pm ET)
                   
                We tried your alternatives, Ed. They have been thoroughly debunked and they have been voted out of office. Try again in about 8 years.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by LuvLuLu (June 17, 2009 3:36 pm ET)
               
            What makes you think that the RNC should be able to choose which diseenting voices ABC airs?

            ABC denying the RNC the right to do that is not evidence that no dissenting voices will be heard.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (June 17, 2009 1:30 am ET)
        1  
        ABC has been asked by the GOP for equal time or to be included, and ABC denied the request

        Gee, if only there were some kind of 'doctrine' to enforce 'fairness'
        Report Abuse
    • Author by vhw28672478 (June 16, 2009 6:05 pm ET)
      3  
      Drudge is a joke
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RandyTog (June 16, 2009 6:59 pm ET)
      1 1
      Why are all you liberals so fired up about Drudge? Give it a rest and sit back and watch state TV from some colored room in the White House!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 17, 2009 8:22 am ET)
        2 1
        some colored room in the White House!
        That was almost clever, in a 1950's bigot sort of way.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (June 17, 2009 3:15 pm ET)
        1  
        Why are all you liberals so fired up about Drudge? (RandyTrog)

        Not really fired up, just noticing that he's full of shlt. Why are you wingnuts so fired up about the truth??
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (June 16, 2009 7:15 pm ET)
      3  
      The only way Drudge gets any attention these days is to scream louder and say more outrageous things than his new johnny-come-lately compatriots on the right, Glenn Beck & Sean Hannity.

      So he makes up more sh** and links to the most unreliable sources all day long: Times of London, Daily Mail, Washington Times, WND, ...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by phredicles (June 16, 2009 7:56 pm ET)
      2  
      I continue to be astinished Drudge is still in business after his promotion of the backwards-B fiasco last fall.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by patachon (June 17, 2009 3:32 am ET)
      2  
      Drudge: "exclude opposing voices on the debate."

      So is he complaining about the lack of supporters of Single-Payer?
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.