Media ignore NYT poll that shows overwhelming public support for health care reform
June 22, 2009 9:57 am ET by Eric Boehlert
The cable and network news outlets were especially guilty of turning away from the A1 Times story on Sunday. The survey indicated a jaw-dropping 85 percent of Americans think "the health care system needed to be fundamentally changed or completely rebuilt." Seventy-two percent support a government-run system, and a solid majority would pay higher taxes to get the reform done.
Yet despite the relentless discussion of the topic of health care on television Sunday, particularly the morning talk shows, the Times poll went largely unmentioned.
According to a search on TVeyes.com both NBC and Fox News (surprise!) never once mentioned the polling results on Sunday. On ABC, CBS, CNN, and MSNBC combined, the results were mentioned approximately one dozen times.
If the poll had showed 85 percent opposed government-run health care reform, what kind of coverage do you think the poll would have received? I'm pretty sure Fox News would have devoted an entire primetime hour to the findings.












The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles




Also I heard today that people who have health insurance from their companies may have to pay tax but I understand that Union Members will be exempt, why is that? Shouldn't we all feel the pain together? Perhaps all the politicians can change THIER insurance first and really lead by example for once.
Could it be?
Could it be that a large portion of the 85% feel compassion toward the 50 million Americans--most from working families--who don't have healthcare?
http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/hlthaff.w5.63/DC1
In 2001, 1.458 million American families filed for bankruptcy. To investigate medical contributors to bankruptcy, we surveyed 1,771 personal bankruptcy filers in five federal courts and subsequently completed in-depth interviews with 931 of them. About half cited medical causes, which indicates that 1.9–2.2 million Americans (filers plus dependents) experienced medical bankruptcy. Among those whose illnesses led to bankruptcy, out-of-pocket costs averaged $11,854 since the start of illness; 75.7 percent had insurance at the onset of illness. Medical debtors were 42 percent more likely than other debtors to experience lapses in coverage. Even middle-class insured families often fall prey to financial catastrophe when sick.
You also never addressed the Unions being exempt. What are these ludicrous talking points I'm suppossedly spewing? By the way I try to listen to ALL points of view. Peace to you.
Please try to have some idea what you're talking about. Just spouting off what some right-wing gasbag on the radio pumps in your ear is not the way to go.
You accidentally made a valid point. Though I doubt you realized it. All these folks showing up in emergency as a last resort drives up insurance costs for everyone. That's why we need a strong public option and a lot more people insured.
From USA Today:
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10367
Original report:
Care Without Coverage: Too Little, Too Late
FISHYTROLL: (with considerable indignation) "18000 people die a year in this country from lack of health care? Do you have proof of that?"
BLUENECK: responds by posting links to the requested proof.
FISHYTROLL: responds, "The union exemption was discussed on the news today was page three from Max Baucus D.MT".
Question: Have you tried Adderall, Concerta, Detxroamphetamine, Focalin, Methylphenidate, Ritalin, Strattera, or Vyvanse? One of them may help.
Of course he hasn't. Thos drugs are expensive!!!!
However, "the people" are NOT stupid. Everyone needs to rattle their representatives NOW.
Let them know how YOU will vote if THEY do not represent you.
it sounds like you have a very hefty stash of drugs for your many obvious problems. I hope my hard earned tax dollars are helping you pay for them. Again if we are to add an additional 41 million people to the health care rolls how are we going to save money? I've heard not one word about tort reform, nor any kind of protections for pharmacudical companies who spend around 1 billion dollars developing drugs. Once the drug is on the market generics are made which is one of the reasons drugs are so expensive. Maybe we can pass some kind of copy right infringement like they do with record companies so the drug companies can recoup their r&d costs before the drugs are cloned.
Any system that keeps HMOs without seriously hampering their power to deny needed coverage simply won't work.