About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Well, we know where the Washington Times stands on Sotomayor

June 23, 2009 10:57 am ET by Jamison Foser

Look what just arrived in my email inbox (click to enlarge):

And down at the bottom:

So much for John Solomon's promise that the Washington Times would not waver from a "neutral, civil voice":

That means producing original reporting on government and political accountability, national security, politics, culture, faith, technology, family, international affairs and other issues of keen interest to our readership without wavering from a neutral, civil voice. All of our journalism will seek to be fair, balanced, accurate and precise.

Tags: The Washington Times, John Solomon, Supreme Court Nominations, Sotomayor Nomination

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by MickD (June 23, 2009 11:05 am ET)
      2  
      In this type of propaganda, they don't care any more. No one (barring MMFA) is going to call them on it, and obviously they know it. The only karma is that such hypocrisy and cynicism will rapidly age anyone involved in it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (June 23, 2009 11:23 am ET)
      2  
      And you BELIEVED that line from the WT?????

      I suppose next thing you are going to tell us is that Fox News is actually NOT fair & balanced, too, right????
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (June 23, 2009 11:28 am ET)
      2  
      This is the newspaper that ran excerpts from Zell Miller's anti-Kerry book above the fold, using banner headlines. Enough said.
      Report Abuse