Anchorage Daily News provides helpful Palin context
July 07, 2009 3:06 pm ET by Eric Boehlert
The conservative talking point is that Palin had to quit being governor because of all the baseless ethics complaints being filed against her by her political opponents. They were crippling her ability to govern--paralyzing her--and costing the state millions of dollars in fees.
Here's how the ADN explains the situation [emphasis added]:
The governor repeatedly returned to the subject of ethics complaints filed against her during her 10-minute interview with the Daily News, saying she spent "most of my day, and my staff, most of their day and the department of law, a lot of their day on the frivolity."
There have been 18 known ethics complaints filed against her. The governor's office said they've been dismissed so far with no finding of wrongdoing, although she did settle a complaint over state-paid travel for her children.
The state personnel board put its cost of dealing with the complaints at about $300,000 -- around two-thirds of which was in addressing the "Troopergate" issue last fall. Palin herself initiated the personnel board investigation on "Troopergate," saying that the state Legislature's investigation of the matter was politicized and she was seeking the appropriate venue to deal with it.
A) Palin quit over $300,000?
B) Is the rest of the press going to report this?


















Did this result in an increased cost to the state of Alaska? But it was worth it? You betcha!
A) Palin quit over $300,000 -- $200,000 of which was the cost of her own ethics complaint against herself?
B) Is the rest of the press going to report this, and if they do will they acknowledge the six figure cost incurred through Palin's own initiation?
family to let someone else finish her term, she made the right move.
If Governor Palin felt it was better for the state of Alaska and her
family to let someone else finish her term, she made the right move.
I second the "she made the right move".
Please put your own appropriate spin here:
Then, completely unaware that the Revolution was fought against the dominant forces of that time and that our Founding Fathers were men of reason and free-thinking indepedence, and completely oblivious to their self-inflicted irony, they go on to offer the most subserviant and docile regurgitations of the classic Right Wing Authoritarian Follower. Case in point above:
LIBERTY OR DEATH writes; "Umm, If my leader says it was for the best, then it was for the best."
Stirring, isn't it? Nathan Hale must be proud.