Another reason not to trust the British press
July 08, 2009 8:50 am ET by Eric Boehlert
It tends to make things up. Here's the latest from the Times of London (via Foxnews.com):
Al Gore today compared the battle against climate change with the struggle against the Nazis.
Did Gore actually make reference to "the Nazis"? Not that we can see. He made a reference to Winston Churchill, but was mum about Nazi. (Does that surprise anyone?)
Not that that mattered because it sure made for a better article to suggest Gore did talk about Nazis, right? And of course, right-wing bloggers loved it:
From Hot Air:
Invoking the Nazis is about as hyperbolic as it gets. What’s next, the aliens from Independence Day?
See, Gore had invoked "the Nazis." Except, of course, that he hadn't.
The Times later cleaned up the article and removed the bogus Nazi reference. The punch line? Right-wing bloggers were indignant that the Times had scrubbed the bogus reference; a reference which Gore never actually made. Tiny hurdles like that never stop right-wing bloggers, why should it stop the Times of London?












Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts
Contrary to media hype, Sarah Palin is very unpopular




I still like me BBC!
When Mika read Gore's comments, they all agreed there was no comparison made to the Nazis.
And while we're on this subject, is there any press we should trust?
It's only a little better than it's tabloid counterparts the sun and the news of the world in regards that it doesn't have topless bimbos on page three and has a slightly better sports coverage.