About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Palin, the press, and the ethics charges

July 09, 2009 9:34 am ET by Eric Boehlert

We noted earlier this week that the Anchorage Daily News did Palin's "No más" moment a real service when it put into context how much money the state of Alaska had spent on what Palin has derided as frivolous ethics investigations against her. They're costing the state millions, Palin has claimed, and cited the expenses as a reason for her decision to quit.

But according to the ADN, the investigations have cost the state roughly $300,000, which raises all kinds of doubts about whether that was really the reason Palin decided to walk away from her governorship. At the time, we asked, did Palin really quit over a $300,000 tab? And would the rest of the press pick up on the ADN's analysis?

We still don't know the real answer to the first question. But we know other journalists are now taking notice. WashPost blogger Greg Sargent delved into why Palin claims the ethics inquiries cost Alaska nearly $2 million in fees:

But [David] Murrow, the [governor's] spokesperson, acknowledged to our reporter, Amanda Erickson, that this total was arrived at by adding up attorney hours spent on fending off complaints — based on the fixed salaries of lawyers in the governor’s office and the Department of Law. The money would have gone to the lawyers no matter what they were doing. The complaints are “just distracting them from other duties,” Murrow said.

In other words, while these lawyers might have been free to do other legal work for the state, the ethics complaints have apparently not had the real world impact Palin has claimed, and didn’t drain money away from cops, teachers, roads and other things.

The ADN made a similar point:

Palin said Monday she didn't view the cost as just the $300,000 for the personnel board -- but rather $2 million for the state. It is a figure her administration now uses -- not meant to be actual checks written by the state but to also reflect time of state employees.

It is a per-hour calculation that the Palin administration put together, involving time spent by state lawyers deciding which public information to release as a result of all public records requests, time spent by governor's office staffers responding to media inquiries about ethics complaints, and time technicians spend on retrieving requested e-mail, among other things.

In other words, the $2 million figure that Palin and her conservative defenders in the press use to justify her resignation looks increasingly dubious. Reporters and pundits ought to take note.

UPDATE: Not surprisingly, Alaska bloggers are all over this story, providing important insight and analysis. See here, here and here.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by captfoster2 (July 09, 2009 9:44 am ET)
         
      Only in the mind of a true right-winger could the departing interviews of Sarah Palin make any damn sense!

      MMfA excerpt from above ---> "did Palin really quit over a $300,00 tab?" <--- You see the mistake, right?

      As for Palin's future in politics... I sincerely hope that the GOP picks her as their leading candidate for the presidency in 2012 or even 2016, or hell, any time in the future...

      This woman will truly be a gift that would keep on giving (to the Democrats) no matter when she runs for the highest office of the land.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bruce1ace (July 09, 2009 9:57 am ET)
           
        Captain, the old saying goes in order to be the best you have to beat the best. She's not close to the best the Republicans can put out there.

        As a moderate conservative I'm glad to see her go, hopefully to never return to prominence in the Republican Party again.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by walstib (July 09, 2009 10:00 am ET)
           
        Huckabee/Palin in 2012!!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (July 09, 2009 1:14 pm ET)
           
        Looks like Palin was just caught in another one of her famous lies...

        "But Murrow, the spokesperson, acknowledged to our reporter," blogger Greg Sargent wrote, "that this total was arrived at by adding up attorney hours spent on fending off complaints — based on the fixed salaries of lawyers in the governor’s office and the Department of Law. The money would have gone to the lawyers no matter what they were doing."


        http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/07/09/reason-palin-gave-for-quitting-may-be-false/
        Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (July 09, 2009 9:51 am ET)
         
      Does the $2,000,000 figure include the time State of Alaska officials spent calculating the $2,000,000 figure?

      One of Gov. Palin's proven accomplishments (opposed to those she claimed that just didn't happen) was getting a windfall profits tax on Alaskan oil companies passed. Yet self-professed conservatives love her.

      From time to time on NewsBusters I pointed this out. I got a hundred arguments about how it really wasn't a windfall profits tax, I was confusing the Alaskan resource funds, etc.

      Bottom Line: People simply become delusional about this woman. Apparently that roster includes Sen. John McCain...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by anotheramerican (July 09, 2009 11:41 am ET)
        2
      If I remember my Economics classes correctly, it is a common practice to calculate utility costs which are those costs that were spent on one item rather than on something else

      If the State of Alaska spent the equivalent of $2M on defending frivolous ethics charges those lawyers were not working on behalf of the State in other matters. That forgone productivity is the utility cost of defending Palin.

      Palin was not yet ready for Prime Time when she was selected by McCain. However no one can fault her for accepting the Veep nomination anymore than one can fault Biden for also accepting the same.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (July 09, 2009 12:08 pm ET)
        2  
        No doubt they had plenty of other work to do in a state of 600,000 people...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by blindeyes (July 09, 2009 12:21 pm ET)
        2  

        I can. There seems to be a general consensus that she was not qualfied. I believe she had to know she was not qualfied. I fault her for not accepting reality. Biden was a senator for 36 years....uh, you can guess where i'm going with this.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Disputed Zone (July 09, 2009 12:30 pm ET)
        2  
        Palin was lying when she suggested that the two million would otherwise go to teachers, troopers and roads. The press should have said so.

        Who faulted Palin for accepting the nomination?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by harley (July 09, 2009 1:52 pm ET)
           
        Palin was not yet ready for Prime Time

        This is the first time you made any sense.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.