WSJ op-ed: "Europe Should Hope Obama Fails"
July 11, 2009 5:03 pm ET by Media Matters staff
From Jeff Durstewitz's July 11 Wall Street Journal op-ed, headlined, "Europe Should Hope Obama Fails":
The great irony here is that the European model American leftists envy couldn't survive without its despised cowboy counterparty. If the U.S. economy weakens because of increased regulation, heavy-handed unionization, and higher taxes and debt to support an expensive social agenda -- all policies Mr. Obama and the Democrats in Congress are pushing hard -- it will hurt Europe.
The market for Europe's exports will shrink, and the U.S. will be less able to defend Europe. Europe is also facing a demographic cataclysm in the near future because of low birth rates (under 1.3 children per woman in the EU, well below the 2.1 necessary to maintain the population). Thus Europe will be increasingly unable to sustain its current welfare state, the very model that the left in the United States adores.











Media Matters: The right-wing media's election analysis just ain't that good
The Friday Rush: For conservatives, $400 million buys defeat at the ballot box
The myth of Fox News' ratings spike




I would think the right wing would love Obama to be successful, that way the Europe model could be dismantled, and the corporate thieves could walk right in and exploit and plunder the Europeans for while.
Why am I thinking the right wing crackpots and corporate thieves are scared to death that if Obama succeeds, they won't have anyplace left in the world to plunder?
Bush & conservative backers have completely already forgotten how we got into this mess.
In fact, up until things completely crashed late 2008, they were still even denying there was a recession!
Bush & conservative backers have completely already forgotten how we got into this mess.
In fact, up until things completely crashed late 2008, they were still even denying there was a recession!
There was a boycott? Really? Did they forget to tell everyone?
Can't regulation be improved without being increased? Can't unions become more effective without becoming heavy-handed? Whose higher taxes? Isn't Obama lowering some taxes? And isn't there a big difference in debt to invest in infrastructure (Obama), and debt to give the wealthiest a huge tax cut (Bush 43)?
If the economy weakens, forgive me, but I will not then assume that all of your suppositions are correct!
Reich-wing GOPigs consistently believe that they speak for others. This is just more proof.