Pot, Meet Kettle
July 13, 2009 5:38 pm ET by Jamison Foser
Chris Matthews on Hardball moments ago, referring to books by David Corn, Mike Isikoff, and Ron Suskind detailing Bush administration practices: "You guys are writing books after the fact. It didn't do us much good at the time, though."
In fact, Suskind's One Percent Doctrine was published in 2006, as was Corn & Isikoff's Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War.
And what good was Chris Matthews doing us "at the time"?
On November 28, 2005, just weeks before Hubris was published, Matthews said of Bush: "Everybody sort of likes the president, except the real whack-jobs, maybe on the left." (It wasn't true.) Two days later, Matthews praised a Bush speech about Iraq - a speech Bush had not, technically, delivered yet -- as a "brilliant political move" and dismissed Democratic critics as "carpers and complainers."
A month earlier, Matthews said Bush "glimmers" with "sunny nobility."
In February 2006, after Hubris was published, Matthews said of Bush: "He looks like he's a wise man now ... almost Atticus Finch."
Then, of course, there's Matthews embarrassing "Mission Accomplished" performance.
Oh, and his March 2006 endorsement of Bush's trustworthiness: "How can you not trust a man who says, 'I won't be able to win this war in my presidency; I'm leaving it up to other presidents in the future'?"
Matthews probably isn't the best person to call out the media for being critical of the Bush administration now, but not doing so when Bush was in office.
UPDATE: ... and Suskind and Corn are pretty far down on the list of people who deserve such criticism. Like, near the bottom. Or on another list entirely.











Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts
Contrary to media hype, Sarah Palin is very unpopular




Someone here once suggested MSNBC should arrange a trade with Fox - Scarborough for Shep Smith. Could we throw in Matthews and maybe get Greta to turn away from the dark side (at least she hed the integrity to debunk the G8 photo).
Should we make fun of a man who was so out of his faculties that he actually made lascivious remarks about another man's crotch on national television and all but screamed aloud in a fit of passion, "Emission accomplished"? Who spent almost eight years reporting on Bush while struggling with his inner fantasies by continually curling his toes in his shoes to try and keep the thrill from running up his leg? Who desperately tried to bypass his latent-homosexual shame-sensors by convincing himself that "I love Bush" could easily be interpreted in his subconscious as "I love bush"?
I think not. We're bigger than that.
I'm just so relieved this crank misread politics so badly that he initially thought to pursue a republican seat in Penn. then switched gears and thought he'd go democrat. He's another Imus (read: crank.) He'll say anything because he's a nut who doesn't care about anything but himself. Can you imagine this oaf in public service? Even Spector is a step up from him.
Every once in a while, he goes on a rant about the lies and cooked intelligence, and it warms my heart. (It makes me feel, for a brief instant, that there may still be hope for the Press.) Unfortunately, the rest of the News Industry seems to have written all that off to history; they don't even want to discuss it.
Waterboarding is kid stuff compared to the real war crimes of the Bush/Cheney junta. They should be held accountable.