About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

The Free Republic/Matt Drudge connection

July 14, 2009 12:59 pm ET by Eric Boehlert

Just a final comment on the pointless 'controversy' last week about a deceiving image of Barack Obama at the G8 summit last week; an innocent image Drudge posted while suggesting Obama had been leering at an underage girl.

As Media Matters reported, the image was first spotted online at the right-wing fever swamp site, Free Republic, which first gained national attention in the 1990's for its unhinged hatred of all-things Clinton, and which recently has played host to an assassination fantasy of Barack Obama and where commenters* denounced his young daughter as a "street whore." Within minutes of being posted at Free Republic, Drudge picked up the G8 photo and 'serious' journalists then quickly treated it as a news event.

My parting thought is that this is not the first time we've seen this sort of Tinker-to-Evers-to-Chance coordination between the Free Republic, Drudge and the Beltway press. Last year during the Democratic primary season, Drudge posted a photo of Obama dressed in African garb. The shot was taken years earlier when the young senator had visited Africa.

Drudge, in one of his patterned fictitious 'exclusives,' claimed that staffers for Sen. Hillary Clinton had been emailing the image around. Zero proof was ever presented to back up the absurd claim, but that didn't' stop the Beltway press (and sadly, large chunks of the liberal blogosphere) from treating the Drudge scoop as a very big deal and turning the pointless Obama image into a scandal. Sort of like with last week's pointless G8 image.

Here's the Freeper connection, as I noted in Bloggers on the Bus:

The snapshot was actually first published online in September 2006, by a news site called Geeska Afrika, which reported on the new Illinois senator's trip to the continent.  The Obama image then resurfaced during the 2008 campaign season in the February 4 issue of the supermarket tabloid National Examiner, which used the photo as part of a scurrilous story headlined "Obama's Shocking Al Qaeda Link." The story contained no reference to the Clinton campaign.

The National Examiner does not publish its stories online, but the photo itself got uploaded to the Internet on February 23, to the rabid, Democrat-hating site, FreeRepublic.com, whose "Freeper" members first gained notoriety by spinning all sorts of wild Clinton conspiracies during the 1990s.

Freepers were obsessed with the Obama-in-Africa photo and desperately wanted it to reach a wider audience. Wrote one eager Freeper after seeing the photo, "It needs to get to Drudge."

Less than 24 hours later, it did.

*Added to provide clarity.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Bad News (July 14, 2009 1:08 pm ET)
         
      The truth isn't good enough to hurt Obama
      So the Republicans use a lie to incease the drama.
      Once upon a time Drudge used a girl with a "B" carved in her face to Race Bait.
      Way to go "Drudge Report" for showing the absolute power of hate.

      Speak truth to power.


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Leftym0m79 (July 14, 2009 1:10 pm ET)
      1  
      Here's my tin-foil hat moment...What's to say that Drudge didn't post the pic himself, to give it that teeny, teeny, tiny, tiny sliver of credibility he needed.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mrhebert74 (July 14, 2009 1:19 pm ET)
         
      I have a criticism of this entry, Mr. Boehlert. It seems as though commenters on Free Republic left the racist remarks. Yet when you write "Free Republic...denounced his daughter as a street whore," the inference I drew is that Free Republic itself did the denouncing. I didn't like when Bill O'Reilly pretended MMFA was responsible for remarks left by its commenters.
      But perhaps someone can help me understand the difference.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (July 14, 2009 1:24 pm ET)
           
        Agree with that for sure.

        If it was the commenters, folks like us, then say it. I'm pretty sure not even the writers at Free Republic would write something like that about the Obama girls.

        I also, don't think you can judge an entire website by its comments sections. Free Republic does a good enough job impugning itself without its comments.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mrhebert74 (July 14, 2009 2:41 pm ET)
           
        Thanks for adding clarification, Mr. Boehlert.
        I have two things to note: 1) the clarification doesn't change the main point of the blog entry, and 2) unlike Bill O'Reilly, you care about clearly stating the facts.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by seeryer (July 14, 2009 7:29 pm ET)
             
          EB could have added that Free Republic (The WEBSITE not commenters) solicited a caption game with the picture of Obama's 11 year old daughter on a foreign trip. That is as totally irresponsible as the comment was. They knew what they were doing when they put the pic up requesting caption entries. They were on MSNBC the next day. I am sure they attracted 20,000 more wingnuts due to the uproar.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by dsikula (July 14, 2009 3:26 pm ET)
         
      Not to nitpick, but it's actually Tinker (singular) to Evers to Chance.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (July 14, 2009 9:29 pm ET)
           
        And the three of them deserve better than to be Drudged.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.