About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

The consequences of bad AP reporting

July 16, 2009 11:10 am ET by Eric Boehlert

It allows politicians and pundits, like Newt Gingrich, to spread misinformation.

Yesterday the AP reported that the House Democrats' tri-committee health-care reform proposal would cost "$1.5 trillion," which is $500 billion more than what the Congressional Budget Office has estimated. So were did the AP numbers come from? From an anonymous Democratic Hill staffer.

As CF noted:

Where is the extra $500 billion coming from on top of the CBO score? What provisions did the CBO not score? Why does this anonymous aide think those provisions cost half a trillion dollars? Does anyone else agree with him or her? Readers wouldn't know from the AP article.

So conservatives have been plastering the misleading article everywhere, and when called on it they just say, well that's what the AP reported.

Here's Gingrich's Tweet from this morning:

A blog challenged my tweet that house democratic health bill would cost $1.5 trillion.that was associated press report of democratic staffer

Must be nice to have one of the world's largest news organizations do your oppo research for  you.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by pointofview (July 16, 2009 11:56 am ET)
        4
      MMFA has NEVER established that the 1.5 trillion number is wrong. The AP has a source, and a dem none the less. It was not miss info to report or quote it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by The_Cat (July 16, 2009 12:12 pm ET)
        2  
        To pointofview:

        I have a source, and a conservative one at that, who informs me that you are highly underinformed on the more important issues facing our nation. In addition, they say your opinions are basely and unjustified, serving only to highlight your general ignorance.

        Now, please explain why -you- should believe my source any more than -I- should believe the AP's source.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by The_Cat (July 16, 2009 12:14 pm ET)
        1  
        should read: 'baseless and unjustified'
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pointofview (July 16, 2009 12:53 pm ET)
            3
          You know as well as I do that reporters have sources. They use them all the time, and the deal is they have to protect their identity. If you don't like the figure, fine. But the fact of the matter is that the story has a source, and this is what is going to happen when the White House and the dems are doing anything and everything they can to NOT reveal the true cost of this thing.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by peace4all (July 16, 2009 1:32 pm ET)
            1  
            ok, i'm gonna type this real slow so that you can understand it. first the AP has a democrat source. how do we KNOW that it was a democrat source. also, aren't reporters supposed to have a second source on a story? on top of that if you use an un-named source you are supposed to have some kind of hard evidence. the story put out by the AP is very sketchy as it's no better than them reporting that "hey, some guy told me this. i have no proof but i like the guy that told me" that is not a news story, thats sewing circle gossip.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by The_Cat (July 16, 2009 3:49 pm ET)
               
            Very good! Reporters have sources. Very true. Now, the question is, if there is only one source, and no other factual evidence to support the assertion, is it wrong to print it?

            -Every- story has a source, pointofview, but not every story is -true-. See the difference? Now, since I have only one source and no factual evidence to support it, I will not print my source's statement in a newspaper, because that would be -unethical-, no matter how much it might please me personally.

            You have still given me no reason to believe the unsupported word of one confidential source, however. As far as the $1 trillion figure, it comes from the CBO report. It was not, repeat not, $1.5 trillion.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by mk3872 (July 16, 2009 12:15 pm ET)
        3  
        The CBO said it was $1T not $1.5T. The $1.5T came from Newt Gingrich and an unidentified "Democractic staffer".
        Report Abuse
      • Author by steeve (July 17, 2009 10:47 pm ET)
           
        So the job of a journalist is to hit "record" on their tape recorders when someone's talking. Good to know.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (July 16, 2009 1:16 pm ET)
         
      I think we all learned the consequences of bad reporting in November 2000.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.

Weekly Columns

Feed Icon