About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Don't know much about history

July 28, 2009 7:33 pm ET by Jamison Foser

Last night, we learned you don't have to know much about politics to write for Politico -- or to be a guest on Hardball.  Tonight, we're reminded that Hardball's host also doesn't know as much as you might think, as Matthews discussed Richard Nixon's press conference after his 1962 campaign for governor ended in defeat:

CHRIS MATTHEWS: As we all know, that was not Richard Nixon's last press conference.  In fact, ten years later, actually it wasn't ten years later, it was six years later, he was elected president in a landslide.

In fact, Nixon won the 1968 popular vote by a mere 500,000 votes; he won the presidency with only 31 electoral votes more than he needed.  Matthews' guest, Pat Buchanan, did point out that the victory was no landslide, which may be the first time Buchanan has ever actually added value to an MSNBC broadcast.

Obviously, it doesn't really matter all that much if Chris Matthews tells viewers that Richard Nixon won the '68 election by a landslide when in fact he won a relatively narrow victory.  But it is another reminder of a point I've made several times in the past: the problem with media coverage isn't just the focus on politics rather than policy; it's that they're lousy at the politics part.  No matter how much they pretend, they aren't experts, and they rarely have genuine insight -- they're just people who convince themselves and each other that they're experts because they all repeat the same conventional wisdom.

(Here's another recent reminder from Chris Matthews.)

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Dr.Mandible (July 28, 2009 7:53 pm ET)
         
      Very true. We get these clowns because they'll dance for the camera, not because they have knowledge or expertise.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by John Paradox (July 28, 2009 8:03 pm ET)
      4  
      To the Neocons, 50% +1 = 'overwhelming mandate'
      Report Abuse
      • Author by progressiveright (July 28, 2009 8:24 pm ET)
        2  
        A pluraluty is a mandate to Neocons. That is the most but less than 50%.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 29, 2009 9:08 am ET)
          2  
          Unless it's a Democrat (Clinton) with the plurality. Not to mention that Bush DIDN'T EVEN HAVE A PLURALITY in 2000. It's only happened 3 other times that the winner outright LOST the popular vote. So Bush's victory scenario is very rare. Clinton's scenario - the winner getting a plurality, but not a majority - happened 17 other times. But for some reason this menat that CLinton was somehow illegitimate.

          And for the record: Bush (Republican) needed the Supreme Court to ignore all precident and Constitutional principle to win. Quincy Adams (National Republicna) needed a corrupt bargain in Congress (he didn't even have a plurality of the ELECTORAL vote!) Hayes' (Republican) election came with irregularities regarding 20 electoral votes, form 3 states, not even being counted (he won by 1 vote). The other was Benjamin Harrison, also a Republican. His seems to be the lone legitimate electoral victory. Gotta love how those republicans have been screwing with democracy since 1824.

          So: All four non-plurality winner were all republicans. 3 of 4 got in by some circumvention of the electoral system. All were medieocre or downright lousy presidents.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by MickD (July 29, 2009 9:56 am ET)
            1  
            Let's hope Matthews is reading this and taking notes. Thanks, Eddie.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (July 28, 2009 9:04 pm ET)
         
      That song is stuck in my head...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 29, 2009 10:44 am ET)
           
        Don't know much about the science books...
        Don't know much about the french I took...

        (You sure this song wasn't written by a republican?)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by d_dayen5172 (July 28, 2009 9:27 pm ET)
         
      You know what happened here, right?

      Nixon did win in a landslide ten years after that press conference in 1962. But Matthews, who thinks he's an eminent historian, did the math in his head and remembered that Nixon was elected in 1968, so he corrected his own staff's copy while reading it off the prompter. Of course, he didn't read the whole thing, so the line became a mistake. And in live TV, you make a mistake and you just keep going.

      So this is a matter of Matthews' arrogance more than anything.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ReasonAndResolve (July 28, 2009 9:53 pm ET)
      1  
      Tonight, we're reminded that Hardball's host also doesn't know as much as you might think


      He knows pretty much what i figured he knew - not much.

      Matthews is an idiot.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.