About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Farmers Insurance reportedly "ceased placing [ads] on Glenn Beck a week ago"

August 19, 2009 1:14 pm ET by Media Matters staff

From an August 19 Politico article:

Already, twenty companies have agreed to pull advertisements from Glenn Beck's television show, within weeks of the Fox host calling Obama "a racist" and saying the president "has a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture."

Now, Farmers Insurance can be added to that list, a Farmers spokesperson confirms to POLITICO.

"We advertise on Fox News Channel which places our ads in the Network programming, and we ceased placing on Glenn Beck a week ago," said the spokesperson.

Just because advertisers pull ads from Beck's show doesn't mean the network will lose any money.

A Fox News spokesperson told the Daily News yesterday that "advertisers referenced have all moved their spots from Beck to other programs on the network so there has been no revenue lost."

ColorOfChange.org
, an African-American online political organization, has been targeting advertisers, while others, like RedState defend Beck in the midst of this boycott.

Previously:

Eight more companies -- including Wal-Mart -- reportedly pull Glenn Beck ads

GMAC Financial Services has "ceased advertising on the Glenn Beck program"

ConAgra, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, RadioShack reportedly halting their Beck ads

Men's Wearhouse reportedly pulls ads from Glenn Beck

Sargento "won't be airing" ads during Glenn Beck

GEICO just saved a bunch of money by not advertising on Fox's Glenn Beck

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Übermensch (August 19, 2009 1:22 pm ET)
      1  
      who the hell didn't see THAT coming?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Barry's Dealer (August 19, 2009 1:41 pm ET)
      1 1
      Wow. Wal-Mart is burning bridges on the right AND the left!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Truth Crusader (August 19, 2009 1:58 pm ET)
      2 1
      How do we appeal to the people astute enough to pull GB advertising and get them to realize that what Hannity's doing isn't really that much different? That "truth" should have some value to us as a people?

      Maybe this latest information about how many people actually believe the lies being propagated by Fox News can be helpful in pointing out how IMPORTANT it is for those in power to stand up for the truth. And when it comes to pushing Fox toward truthful reporting...only the advertisers have the power.

      We've got to get them to realize that it's not just Beck!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fishergirlusmc (August 19, 2009 2:25 pm ET)
      3 12
      For every one that drops him, there are five more waiting to take his place. His ratings are excellent. How does he compare to Boy Maddow and keith Uglyman and his angry inch?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (August 19, 2009 2:38 pm ET)
        8 2
        Ratings do not equal quality. And, reaching less than 1% of the American population is hardly something to write home about.

        The rest of your comments show why after many years of Republican voting, I have turned away completely from the phony conservatives in this country. Your comments show that you are not a conservative, you are simply a Fox groupie.

        Just disgusting.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by fishergirlusmc (August 19, 2009 4:33 pm ET)
          2 7
          boo hoo hoo bintx what is so disgusting about my comments? Oh by the way I am a conservative but that is my opinion of those two idiots. Glenn beck has 1% I'll bet little rachel and uglyman together don't have that.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (August 19, 2009 5:01 pm ET)
            4 2
            No, I don't believe you are a conservative. You just get into the hate speech. That's not conservatism.

            As for ratings, what difference does that make? I don't watch programs because of their ratings, I watch them because I enjoy them. I watch actual news programs to get news . . . none of the ones you've mentioned here, even the ones that you gave the childish names are news programs. They are OPINION programs . . . ENTERTAINMENT programs. Do you understand the difference?

            As I said, you are simply a Fox groupie. Do you get paid for your loyalty to these folks who are LAUGHING at you? You are simply a means to an end for them. You watch, they tell you the lies you want to hear and they get bigger paychecks.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by fishergirlusmc (August 19, 2009 7:49 pm ET)
              1 2
              you must be new here or else you never read any posts. If anyone doesn't like your opinion here they call you all kinds of names. Funny how I never read any of your posts chastising many of those who call others names here. I have seen Rachel Maddow out in the gay community over the years and believe me she would not be insulted in the least being called boy or sir, in fact it would be the opposite. As for Uglyman, he is what he is, even the folks who work around him at MSNBC say what a miserable man he is. And a few women he has dated has said he is rather "small" if you get my drift. I only recently started to watch Beck in the last few months when I can, he is very entertaining and he speaks about alot of different subjects
              Report Abuse
              • Author by peace4all (August 20, 2009 10:13 am ET)
                   
                do you have any proof at all to back up wat you say here of are you parroting more winger talking points. how would you have the slighest idea what wemon who date keith say? have you met racheal and she told you she does not mind being called sir?
                you know the 9th commandment say thous shalt not bear false witness. but i guess you know god to and he was not really serious about that one huh?
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (August 20, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
                   
                I won't call you names. I find your name calling childish and very junior highish.

                I will say again, you are not a conservative, you are simply a hate speech groupie. A clue: These people you like with the GREAT ratings? They are laughing at you and others like you who believe the swill they are offering.

                As for the rest of your post? LOL!!!!!!!! Who told you all of this? A friend of a friend of a friend of your great-uncle Ned's friend's friend?

                Grow up.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (August 20, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
                   
                I won't call you names. I find your name calling childish and very junior highish.

                I will say again, you are not a conservative, you are simply a hate speech groupie. A clue: These people you like with the GREAT ratings? They are laughing at you and others like you who believe the swill they are offering.

                As for the rest of your post? LOL!!!!!!!! Who told you all of this? A friend of a friend of a friend of your great-uncle Ned's friend's friend?

                Grow up.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (August 20, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
                   
                I won't call you names. I find your name calling childish and very junior highish.

                I will say again, you are not a conservative, you are simply a hate speech groupie. A clue: These people you like with the GREAT ratings? They are laughing at you and others like you who believe the swill they are offering.

                As for the rest of your post? LOL!!!!!!!! Who told you all of this? A friend of a friend of a friend of your great-uncle Ned's friend's friend?

                Grow up.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (August 20, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
                   
                I won't call you names. I find your name calling childish and very junior highish.

                I will say again, you are not a conservative, you are simply a hate speech groupie. A clue: These people you like with the GREAT ratings? They are laughing at you and others like you who believe the swill they are offering.

                As for the rest of your post? LOL!!!!!!!! Who told you all of this? A friend of a friend of a friend of your great-uncle Ned's friend's friend?

                Grow up.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (August 20, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
                   
                I won't call you names. I find your name calling childish and very junior highish.

                I will say again, you are not a conservative, you are simply a hate speech groupie. A clue: These people you like with the GREAT ratings? They are laughing at you and others like you who believe the swill they are offering.

                As for the rest of your post? LOL!!!!!!!! Who told you all of this? A friend of a friend of a friend of your great-uncle Ned's friend's friend?

                Grow up.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 20, 2009 10:36 am ET)
               
            Yes, you are a conservative - or at least representative of the knuckledragging thuggery that conservatism has been reduced to. That you can't see what's wrong with your comments is evidence that you have a problem, and are the problem.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (August 20, 2009 11:58 am ET)
                 
              No, this person isn't really a conservative, this person is simply one of the folks who likes the bilge that he/she hears on Fox or on hate talk radio. Those people are NOT conservatives.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 20, 2009 12:34 pm ET)
                   
                Yeah, I get what your saying. I really do. But what you call a conservative (if I'm not mistaken a fiscally-conservative/populist/libertarian?) really no longer have a voice or a party that represents them. And I don't say that to MOCK. I think it's sad. And I'd be as likely to vote ofr the party I described as I would a Democrat, possibly more so. (I'm not sure if that's what YOU mean, but...)

                So the true conservative movement has been usurped by neo-cons and intellectually lazy thugs like Fox and Limbaugh. The right's side of the debate has disappearewd, replaced by mindless propaganda and lies. And the "left" now dominaytes much of the center as well.

                So while you may be correct in a broad, philosphical sense, my point was a more pragmatic one. He IS typical of those who call themselves conservative now. You may say he's not, but you are now (regrettebly) in the minority within your own movement.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (August 19, 2009 2:51 pm ET)
        1  
        For every one that drops him, there are five more waiting to take his place.

        Name the advertisers.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (August 19, 2009 3:01 pm ET)
        1 4
        For every one that drops him, there are five more waiting to take his place

        That sounds like a line a terrorist leader would say.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (August 19, 2009 3:27 pm ET)
        2 1
        Sure. But it has to make the network think a bit if a large number of advertisers refuse to have their ads appear on one particular show.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jmille426471 (August 19, 2009 3:49 pm ET)
        3 1
        Problem is these companies will have to have their brands associated with Glenn Beck. Ratings wont make up for that.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by tcooper62 (August 19, 2009 4:06 pm ET)
        1 1
        Just makes me want to watch him more.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by historygeek001 (August 19, 2009 4:21 pm ET)
        3  
        Are you actually proud that you have no critical thinking skills?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (August 19, 2009 3:06 pm ET)
      4 2
      Twenty advertisers have pulled out like the New York Central - and Mr. Beck is on vacation?

      Perhaps after an extended trip to the woodshed he can't sit down long enough to do his show.

      Sounds to me like his masters have done their best to straighten him out. He didn't take it very well - so has been told to go off and think about what is left of his "career."

      Yes, I posted this elsewhere on MM4A. Call it wishful thinking if you want to...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mikecampbelly2k (August 19, 2009 6:33 pm ET)
        1 4
        Beck's ratings are up. FOX news ratings are up. FOX news is bringing out the big guns next week to support Beck. You lefties will lose this one just like you've lost every other boycott of Conservative talkers. America doesn't want to hear your crap - witness Air America tanking, Rachel and Keith's pathetic ratings (our market here in Southern Minnesota just dropped MSNBC!), and the Town hall uprisings. We're here to fight you EVERY STEP OF THE WAY.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (August 20, 2009 12:10 pm ET)
             
          Another one of those phony conservatives who believes that anyone who disagrees with him or his heroes just HAS to be a "leftie." You don't even know what conservatism is, how the heck can you expect to know what a liberal is.

          Ratings, schmatings. Fox's total viewership at night is less than 1% of the American population. Believe it or not, most people I know don't watch cable opinion networks at all. I, myself, watch very little. I can read the news and form my OWN opinions, I don't need a high school dropout like Beck or a college dropout, former carpenter like Hannity telling me what to think.

          Oh, and Air America . . . it's alive and well, so that's one fallacy in your statement above. You really need to broaden your horizons a bit . . . The rest of the country knows a heck of a lot more about what's going on around them than the people who watch Fox. Your very small group of fellow Fox viewers are WOEFULLY uninformed.

          Try caring more about your country than you do an ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK. They really don't give a flip about your loyalty . . . they are laughing at you. You think they care . . . they simply care about making their money.


          Report Abuse
    • Author by andrea_m_taylor5058 (August 19, 2009 3:10 pm ET)
      1  
      Wow, it is unbelievable a person talking as crazy as Beck is even allowed on TV with a TV show.

      How far can all this go? Where will the breaking point be?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mikecampbelly2k (August 19, 2009 6:25 pm ET)
      1 2
      I see Beck's ratings are UP! Thanks Colorofchange! Fox news continues to grow, the Democratic party approval rating is under 50%, the "Left" is in disarray! In case you snarky liberals need proof, check it out: http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/2009/08/19/boycott-boosts-fox-news-ratings/
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (August 20, 2009 12:12 pm ET)
           
        So, they've added a few more thousand people?

        You do realize that Fox has fewer viewers for their primetime than Jon & Kate plus 8. Survivor had 6 times the viewers than Fox's entire prime-time lineup.

        You're being had, buddy.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by NoNannyNeeded (August 19, 2009 7:18 pm ET)
      1 3
      If the "organization" that Pres. Obama's "green czar" founded is the one behind this one behind the boycott we have come to a very scray time in our history.

      Let's look as this shall we? Beck criticizes the president & thinks he feels racist toward white people & now we have a person with close contact with the White House & the activist group getting one to do the dirty work for the oteher. Basically part of our gov't with NO accountability except to Obama himself going after a private citizen in private market! I guess this is what Chicago politics looks like!

      Guys listen, it really doesn't matter what you think about Beck's comments, but that's out 1st Ammendment doing it's job. The purpose for the 1st Ammendment was to protection from teh government particulary in policital speech and that is exactly what's happening!

      For you out there that think socialism is the best way to go & you're open about your viewpoints i think you are wrong, but I respect you viewpoint & look forward to further discussions. I also apprectiate your honesty & ability to speak frankly regarding your beliefs. for those of you who think this govenement (and I mean both Dems & Repubs) are somehow going to make us a free & better America based on the Constitution, PLEASE wake up and see we are losing our liberties every day. Compare what is happening now to previous times in history when government systems changed. Review the history of the birth of our nation & see how far we have come off track.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by shadowedangel (August 20, 2009 2:56 am ET)
        1  
        I have the first amendment right as well to say I believe in health care reform and in the actions of our current president and am quite happy to talk about them in my living room at home without corporate sponsorship. The first amendment does not give glenn beck the right to advertising so he can spread his fear and hate on public airwaves. It gives him the right to do exactly what I do, say what I want in my own private life.
        If color of change wants to ask his advertisers if they really want to support his words that is their 1st amendment right. and It is a company's right to take money away from something they don't believe in.

        There, no one's rights have been stepped on and no one has forced anyone to do anything they don't want to. Now to exercise my 1st amendment right... Anyone who doesn't understand this concept is an idiot that needs to go back and take a civics class again and again until they pass.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NoNannyNeeded (August 20, 2009 8:46 pm ET)
             
          I completely support your right to speak out for health care reform & you are correct the 1st Ammendment doesn't protect Beck from people speaking out or advertisers pulling out. I'm concerned about the likelihood that the Obama administration is part of it. Remember the 1st Ammendment is protection for citizens's speech against repercussion from the government. Civics class passed. Thanks!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (August 20, 2009 12:21 pm ET)
           
        You need to put away the e-mail and talking points. They are incorrect. Van Jones has not been associated with ColorofChange for over 2 years and I personally had never heard of either Jones or ColorofChange when I wrote MY letters to Beck's advertisers asking simply if they really wanted their products associated with this loudmouthed, lying jerk. Beck exercised his right to speak freely, I exercised mine and the advertisers exercised theirs, all without government interference.

        Please quit throwing around the "s" word. You obviously have no idea what you're talking about, you just lifted it from the e-mail with the talking points. I'm a moderate conservative from the 2nd most conservative area in the country and I think Beck and his mouth are counter-productive to the health of this country.

        Were you upset when the last administration trashed our Fourth Amendment rights? Just curious.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NoNannyNeeded (August 20, 2009 8:41 pm ET)
             
          I have no problem with you writing a letter to Beck's advertisers. You ceratinly have that right & I praise you for taking a stand. The problem I have it the close ties to the White House has with ColorofChange. It just seems very convient but this is how politics go, especially in Chicago. That is what I meant about the govenment going after a citizen due to political speech and that is exactly what the 1st Ammendment is all about.

          Personally I think Olbermann is the loud mouth lying jerk. He called Bush a fascist on many occassion, where's the outrage. I don't boycott I just turn him off.

          As far as the "S" word, why can't it be mentioned? I do know what I'm talking about. I didn't know only a select group was allowed to say it. Is that a work only left for people who support it? Could it be that since most American's know it is an unsuccessful form of goverment there is a stigma therefore the new buzz word is "progressive'?

          i don't need talking points-I tink for my self. As I have mentioned several times, I disgusted by the many Republicans have acted as well.

          For the record, i'm a true conservative in probably in the most conservative & may I add prosperous state. i'm in the healthcare field & this proposal the Democrats are trying to shove onto us is a bad idea. Why did they themselves vote down the proposal to be on the same ins. tehy want us to take?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by kl209 (August 20, 2009 4:21 am ET)
      2 1
      Greetings
      I am signing this online petition not to thank Glenn Beck for his bold stand for the Principles and Values that he holds dear and for his desire to educate the American public, but to alert people to be appalled by them.
      Mr Beck has erroneously motivated tens of thousands to learn more about the U.S. Constitution and the founding of our great country. He has helped expose the corruption in both political parties, Fox News, and himself, and speaks from the heart even when it is not logically correct and may be considered controversial by many to do so.
      I am also signing this petition to ask Fox News Channel to discontinue support of the Glenn Beck television program and to let his advertisers know that I proudly reject the Glenn Beck program and will look to reward those that drop advertising on his show by using their products and services when possible.
      To current or past advertisers that have reportedly withdrawn support of his program, you are to be congratulated. To those that are continuing to advertise to appease the demands of special interest groups, please know that I reserve the right to stop purchasing your product or using your services as a form of economic protest.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (August 20, 2009 12:27 pm ET)
           
        "Mr Beck has erroneously motivated tens of thousands to learn more about the U.S. Constitution and the founding of our great country. He has helped expose the corruption in both political parties, Fox News, and himself, and speaks from the heart even when it is not logically correct and may be considered controversial by many to do so."

        Boy, have you got it bad. This is the biggest load of BS, I've ever read. Beck is an ENTERTAINER and cares NOTHING about any of this stuff. His favorite person to mention, Thomas Paine, would be APPALLED at the use of his name by this jerk.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by kfraz43 (August 20, 2009 2:02 pm ET)
         
      Another company covering its butt for potential re-entry when the storm blows over? I received this email today from Progressive Insurance in response to a thank you email I sent last week:

      Thank you for reaching out to us.

      Some media reports have created the incorrect impression that Progressive pulled advertising in response to specific comments made on a show, but that is not the case. We did not buy advertising time on the The Glenn Beck Program, so when we learned that our ad had aired during the show, we corrected the error. I hope this clarifies the situation.

      Sincerely,

      Mary O.
      Progressive Internet Representative
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.

Weekly Columns

Feed Icon