About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

The media miss the clear implications of Republican comments about Kennedy

August 26, 2009 11:59 am ET by Jamison Foser

John Mercurio has a good piece at National Journal's web page, looking at the dubious media meme that health care reform would have happened by now were it not for the late Sen. Edward Kennedy's absence from the Senate.

As Mercurio notes, both Democrats and Republicans have been pushing that idea for quite some time, though for different purposes.  But I think he misses a subtle implication in the comments from some Republicans.  Here's Mercurio:

Last weekend on ABC's "This Week," Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said Kennedy's absence had made a "huge, huge difference" in the health care debate. "No person in that institution is indispensable, but Ted Kennedy comes as close to being indispensable as any individual I've ever known in the Senate," he said.

...

For Republicans, it's a chance to humanize themselves at little cost. Worried that they'll ultimately be viewed as the party that blocked meaningful reform, they are using Kennedy as a convenient foil. If only he had been here, they say, Kennedy would have used his magic touch to reach a meaningful compromise, bringing us on board. 

What I think Mercurio misses is that Republicans -- including McCain and Orrin Hatch, who he also quotes -- are using Kennedy to implicitly criticize Democratic Senators, suggesting that Kennedy, unlike other Senate liberals, would have caved by now.  Here's another McCain comment from This Week:

"He had a unique way of sitting down with the parties at a table and making the right concessions, which really are the essence of successful negotiations," McCain said. "So it's huge that he's absent, not only because of my personal affection for him, but because I think the health care reform might be in a very different place today."

Got that?  According to McCain, had Kennedy been active in Senate negotiations, he would have made "the right concessions."  And what is the key concession Republicans like McCain have been demanding?  The elimination of a public option.  By McCain's telling, there is no health care agreement because Senate Democrats haven't dropped the public plan like Kennedy would have.

Hatch made much the same claim on NBC's Meet the Press last Sunday, saying of Kennedy "the first thing he would have done would have been to call me and say, 'Let's work this out.' And we would work it out so that the best of both worlds would work" -- then adding "I would never go to a federal government program. If we do that, we'll bankrupt the country."

So Hatch, like McCain, claims that Kennedy would have gotten an agreement done by dropping the public plan. 

Republicans may be, as Mecurio says, using Kennedy's absence to "humanize themselves" -- but they're also using it to subtly bash Senate Democrats for not dropping the public plan, as they claim Kennedy would have done. Whether that is accurate, fair, or in good taste is for others to decide.  But it is the clear meaning of their statements.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by thebewilderness (August 26, 2009 12:36 pm ET)
      4 1
      Oh sure, the lefty liberal they have sneered at for years for being a lefty liberal would certainly have compromised his life's work away for the sake of Republican style bipartisanship.
      NOT!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DrGianrico (August 26, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
      1 1
      Hatch and McCain both reveal a lot about themselves in how they see compromise in successful negotiations. Both claim the Sen.Kennedy's unique way was to make "the right concessions..."
      No contribution from either McCain or Hatch on how they are as willing make concessions. Typical of most GOP members in this HCR debate. The want concessions..but..have yet to contribute a valid or meaningful proposal on how to reform a broken system. I have yet to hear the Media ask pointed questions and follow ups to these GOP leaders. Without public option, there are no reform.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Cheney2012 (August 26, 2009 1:52 pm ET)
        1  
        Idiots like Hatch and McCain have compromised all the time. Therein lies the problem. No compromise with the left this time.

        And in fact, there is no need to compromise. The lefties have the votes. Why don't they pass the bill? They want political cover because the bill is an abomination.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bilbo_dies (August 26, 2009 2:02 pm ET)
            1
          Why don't they pass the bill?

          Because, even though they shouldn't, they are still trying to work WITH the republicans. BTW Something that the republicans would not do, if they were in the majority.

          BTW We do understand that a lot of right wing repubs don't like McCain because he is not "conservative" enough.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Doug-Life (August 26, 2009 1:50 pm ET)
         
      was he really that important to the healthcare reform debate/legislative process? what happened during the clinton years?..nixon years?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (August 26, 2009 3:31 pm ET)
           
        From what I remember, Ted Kennedy was always in the forefront of "health care for all". Just because he tended to be the lone voice in the wilderness didn't mean that he wasn't promoting health care reform.
        Report Abuse