About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

It's a dollar-a-holler on Glenn Beck

August 28, 2009 4:38 pm ET by Eric Boehlert

"Dollar-a-holler" is the old-time radio term used to describe ad rates on small-town AM radio stations. I'm reminded of the phrase after reading this key passage from the Los Angeles Times, and how Beck no longer has any A-list advertisers:

As a result, few major businesses remain as sponsors of Beck’s eponymous 2 p.m. PDT program. On Wednesday, the only big companies with a presence during his show were Bank of America and the Wall Street Journal, whose parent company News Corp. also owns Fox News. The rest of the commercials included spots for gold seller Rosland Capital; Ashley Furniture Home Store; Empire Carpet; Liberty Medical, a diabetes medical supplier; Johnson Law Group, an asbestos litigation firm; “Shadow Government,” a new book critical of Obama published by the National Republican Trust; and the anti-tax group TeaPartyExpress.org.

Turns out Bank of America isn't even a Beck sponsor. So as best I can tell, all the blue chip advertisers have abandoned Glenn Beck.

All. Of. Them.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by toombsie (August 28, 2009 5:03 pm ET)
      6 1
      Damn I bet I could afford a commercial on the Glenn Beck show now. His stock has tanked!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (August 28, 2009 5:26 pm ET)
        7 1
        Wouldn't it be hilarious to buy an anti-Beck commercial on his own show. At this point they'd probably accept it!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by toombsie (August 28, 2009 5:37 pm ET)
          2  
          I was thinking the same thing... if mediamatters ran an Anti-Beck commercial on Beck's show. Probably be pretty cost effective advertising getting to the people who need to see it the most. Just loop "President Obama has a deep heated hatred for white people" over and over for 3 minutes then ask "Does this sound like a sane person to you?"
          Report Abuse
          • Author by diamonds (August 29, 2009 2:09 pm ET)
            1 2
            Saying "President Obama has a deep heated hatred for white people" is a pretty bold statement to make but I would like to know why it is so objectionable. Considering that Media Matters even bothered to compile 30 minutes of his "facts" to back it up (and I admit there are a lot of them), and I haven't heard any good arguments beyond "he hires white people" but that wouldn't explain away so-called reverse racism (which is pretty obvious is what Beck meant anyways). Without anything else in such a video I would say "Yes."
            Report Abuse
            • Author by beinemac (August 29, 2009 3:46 pm ET)
              2  
              "...why it is so objectionable"?

              I guess you are asking us to prove a negative (that he is not a racist)? Do you start from the assumption that all presidents are racists, or just the black ones?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (August 30, 2009 9:16 am ET)
                 
              Beck meant "reverse racism"? Is that why he said he thought Obama had a deep-seated hatred for white people? That would be racism.

              And as beinemac suggests, someone could make an accusation against you, and it's not up to you to prove otherwise. There should be evidence for the charge to be made in the first place.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by Major Tom (August 28, 2009 6:05 pm ET)
        3  
        I quote Beck, "the end of this still hasn't been unwritten."
        Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (August 28, 2009 5:11 pm ET)
      5 2
      Hopefully, once Murdoch realizes that Beck is and will be a non-starter for most advertisers worth pursuing, Glenn's parting gifts will include his very own soapbox. That way, he can stand on the streets with the rest of the nuts, and debate the talking points of the day with his Constitutionally protected free speech.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by reanna-mator (August 28, 2009 6:23 pm ET)
        1  
        I don't think he'd be as loud if he weren't getting paid for it.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (August 28, 2009 6:33 pm ET)
        3  
        Beck doesn't have to be pulled off the air to win back his sponsers (although it wouldn't be an infringement of his right to free speech if he were.) All he has to do is tone down the rhetoric.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MiddleLeft (August 28, 2009 6:38 pm ET)
          2  
          All he has to do is tone down the rhetoric.

          That would not be a possibility according to Beck himself.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by rebopine (August 28, 2009 5:26 pm ET)
      5 1
      I must not understand conservatives, try and I may, I just don't get it.

      If this many advertisers pulled out in just a few weeks, why is he still on the air?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by kieramc (August 28, 2009 5:53 pm ET)
          7
        The Glen Beck Show is a truthful fact based t.v. show. Open your eyes! Do you not think it is unfair for one person to decide where all our tax paid stimulus dollars are going? Don't be swayed by Hollywood HYpe. Open your eyes and ears and listen to what he says before you judge. He is on our side.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (August 28, 2009 10:05 pm ET)
          6  
          Not that the rest of your post wasn't crazy enough, but where the hell did "Hollywood Hype" come from? You don't have to work every wingnut buzzword into every comment. Pace yourself.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (August 29, 2009 1:54 pm ET)
             
          He is on our side.

          He may be on YOUR side, but his insane hate-filled paranoid ramblings tell me he's not on MY side.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (August 28, 2009 6:34 pm ET)
        2  
        FOX probably believes that the controversy will fade in a few more weeks and the sponsers will start coming back. And they're probably right.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (August 28, 2009 6:49 pm ET)
        1  
        Murdoch can bankroll his show while they hold out hope that the heat will blow over. He lost millions on Fox News until they struck a chord with the ridiculous right. He's still pumping cash into the disastrous Fox Business channel with the same hope.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by oscar the grouch (August 29, 2009 1:20 am ET)
            2
          Yep, the Fox Business channel. Listened for the first time a couple of nights ago (working at home, needed the noise in the background as a concentration aid) and there is this weirdo telling us that the government is not responsible for us, that we are responsible for the government and ourselves. Talking about sacrifice to get out of debt, etc. What a weirdo, just doesn't realize the only way to build an economy is through debt....
          Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (August 29, 2009 1:57 pm ET)
               
            Was that the show set in the bar with the Latino talking head in an impossibly short dress sitting next to the long-haired teabaggin' freak?

            I watched that show once. Their guest - BENNY HINN!!! He said it was the first time he's ever been in a bar. Priceless.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by oscar the grouch (August 29, 2009 7:00 pm ET)
                 
              Have no idea as I was only half listening with my back to the set, using the sound kind of to simulate my office setting as I was doing some work related stuff at home. I heard what I noted above as it did catch my attention long enough to listen briefly. Guess I'll have to remember the time and tune in Monday to see who the weirdo may have been.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by dmhack (August 28, 2009 7:35 pm ET)
        2  
        Becky is still on the air because while advertisers may have fled his show, they did not flee Fox.

        I appreciate the boycott's aims, but I still insist that the only way to make a real difference is for advertisers to pull their ads not just from Becky's show, but from FNC. If you don't hit Rupert in the wallet, nothing will change.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (August 28, 2009 7:57 pm ET)
             
          True, Rupert can shift the revenue around, but I wonder if the sponsors are still buying the same amount of time from Fox and simply stipulating not to run them during Beck's hour, or if the sponsors are buying fewer spots because of it. If more and more big name advertisers are in fact paying Fox fewer dollars because of this, it's got to have some discernible impact to Rupert's bottom line. Some inside info on this would be interesting to see.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by spockosemail2393 (August 28, 2009 8:20 pm ET)
      2  
      I can't tell you how pleased I am at all the advertisers who have left Glenn Beck. An advertiser alert program is NOT a boycott and I do wish more people would make this clear. I guess the verb spockoed didn't catch on as Sara Robinson had hoped as a short hand for convincing an advertiser that someone is bad for your brand. The advertiser choosing to leave is different than pressure from consumers saying "We won't buy your products" if you don't stop doing something in a boycott.

      The methods and messages that I developed in 2006 were used very effective against right-wing talk radio station KSFO. In 2007 a minimum of 28 advertisers left. In 2008 the money they lost lead to Melanie Morgan's contract not being renewed. So be patient folks. If Fox was smart they would fire him so he could become a "martyr" for movement conservatism. They love to be victims.

      Ratings are only good if they can lead to more money "a dollar a holler" will require someone to subsidize him (as Eric points out). Fox has deep pockets and their ROI to the Republican party and the movement Conservative Movement has paid off already. They might keep him on in gratitude for past acts and for future rabble rousing.

      As shaggles said below, how Fox chooses to respond to this is based on their world view and Beck's. To admit they went too far is to risk alienating their base. They just have to sit and eat it. Absorb the loses. Attack the people who are alerting the advertisers and wait.

      With my campaign with KSFO in 2006/07 I found out that when we got through to major advertisers they were horrified by the violent rhetoric of the hosts. To stem the bleeding KSFO/ABC radio/Disney management attacked me and had my blog shut down. They did this rather than tell the hosts to cool it with the calls to kill people on the air. Then they held a "very special program" to address the "scurrilous lies and rumors" about what they claim I said. (Of course I used their exact quotes and they couldn't show I lied about anything, but we've seen how they complain about the truth.) They couldn't prove I took anything out of context or that I edited any clips either.

      One host said he apologized on one comment, but of course he made others he never apologized for. Some of the most egregious comments were embraced! Lee Rodgers made it a point to claim he was not apologizing. Here is Lee Rodgers NOT apologizing and saying he would say the same thing again about torturing and blowing the brains out of Kevin Holder, a criminal in Lincoln Nebraska. (audio link) Note how he said that he didn't know that Holder was black then and now (months later) and can't see that what I was objecting to wasn't the fact the man he wanted tortured was black, but that he would talk about torturing and blowing someone's brains out in the first place. From the advertiser's perspective he said it right before a commercial break for In and Out Burger! (who left after they were alerted, btw)

      Management sold this special event as their response to the "crackpots with keyboards" and some of the advertisers bought it. I couldn't afford to stay on top of them but the campaign cost them 28 advertisers by then and who knows how many later, I've been told by insiders this resulted in millions in lost revenue.

      The KSFO hosts modified their talk for a while because of the lost revenue, but when Obama got elected it was back to the old methods. Now they talk about all the guns they are buying and use "acceptable" racism and bigotry toward Iraqis, Muslims and gays. Example?
      Here is Lee Rodgers calling for the massacre of all Iraqis.
      That's right, on publicly licensed broadcast radio he says that we should commit genocide of the the Iraq people.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Brian (August 29, 2009 10:14 am ET)
        2
      Way to go Glenn. Finally someone standing on principals that matter to a majority of good citizens! Seems he must be on to something if his ratings are so good and he's garnered all the bad press from obviously biased media outlets. What will you do if he's proven right? If he's wrong, he'll say he was wrong and deal with it. Would you wake up and admit the truth, give him credit for putting himself on the front line or would you find another excuse?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (August 29, 2009 1:11 pm ET)
           
        We get a lot of similar posts on Beck. Rah rah Beck, and look at the ratings. Train wrecks will always be popular to watch. I'm still waiting for any details on those principals, questions, and 3 million veiwers is in no way shape or form a majority of anything in a country of 300 million.
        Help save our billianairs from any responsibilty!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by oscar the grouch (August 29, 2009 7:01 pm ET)
             
          Need to remember that 3 million number when you are watching Oldermann, Mathews, Maddow, etc.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by eweston8542983 (August 29, 2009 7:16 pm ET)
               
            I don't as a rule bring up ratings for what I watch, and as I have neither cable nor satellite reception I don't see any of the three anyway. Except by the occasional rare computerized internet rerun.
            What with the digital conversion wiping out half of the channels I used to watch, the tv don't get much use these days. The analog signal even when reception faded a bit kept up the story by sound at least. With digital there is no continuation when this happens. Leaving me unimpressed with this brave new media. It was some democrats bright idea, right? ;)
            Report Abuse
    • Author by patachon (August 29, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
      2  
      So even Corporate America can't stomach this fascist. That's good news.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.