Scarborough blasts right-wing conspiracy theories
September 03, 2009 7:57 pm ET by Media Matters staff
From Joe Scarborough's Twitter page:

September 03, 2009 7:57 pm ET by Media Matters staff
From Joe Scarborough's Twitter page:



The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
|
|
||
![]() |
||
Give 'em hell, Joe!
What has he done so far? He has bailed out the banks and let them go back to business as usual, he has decreased transparency even though he said he'd make government more transparent, he has intensified the war in Afghanistan, he has given up on the public option, he has cut a deal with drug companies to effectively insure their enormous profits for many years to come, he has ignored habeas corpus, etc. Do Republican's fault him on those things? No, they complain that he is indoctrinating the youth with a "stay in school speech" and is planning on "killing grandma." It's unbelievable. If you are going to be mad at him at least have legitimate complaints.
He was 100% correct.
1989 was a watershed year for the right. They started in earnest going off their rockers when Reagan started feeding them BS, but 1989 they were well on their way to what we see today.
That's not normally true, but it's true when one of the sides is insane. You can't rationally criticize the non-insane party from the perspective of the insane party.
The only legitimate criticism of democrats comes from the left.
Give him some time and the next thing you hear will be the next version of "Death Panels or Bither" nonsense.
He is still a died in the wool repub, he just is smart enough to know that you can only push the crazy stuff so far or so long.
I thought Joe was an evil right wing hack along with the bobble head bleach blonde?
He takes the R's to task and now he's A OK! I love this site!
Thus, no matter who, when someone is spouting crazy stuff, they get called out for it.
If the same person is pointing out others are spouting crazy stuff, then they are used as a data point.
I like to use good ole Chris Matthews as an example.
Some days he is on air going with the flow, just repeating the crazy stuff without any context or fact checking.
The next day he may be on air pointing out that a story is untrue, once you take the time to check the facts.
I have seen MMFA post story lines about him doing both.