About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Why is health care liar Michelle Bernard hosting an MSNBC special about health?

September 09, 2009 2:44 pm ET by Jamison Foser

According to the Orlando Sentinel, on September 20, "MSNBC political analyst Michelle Bernard" will moderate a two-hour special featuring Bill Cosby and NAACP president Ben Jealous, "focusing on the parenting, education and health issues facing the poor in the United States."

Michelle Bernard is a frequent MSNBC guest, particularly on Hardball.

Bernard is also the president and CEO of the conservative Independent Women's Forum, in which capacity she is busy spreading lies about health care.

Like this one: "More American women are going to die of breast cancer if you and I surrender to President Obama's nationalized healthcare onslaught."

Here's how FactCheck.org describes the health care lies coming from Bernard's IWF:

A False Appeal to Women's Fears

Republican-leaning group claims health care legislation could lead to 300,000 deaths from breast cancer, but uses old statistics, faulty logic and false insinuations.

A conservative group with Republican ties called the Independent Women's Forum is airing an ad that says "300,000 American women with breast cancer might have died" if our health care were "government run" like England's, citing the American Cancer Society as a source for the figure. In fact, a spokesman for the cancer society's advocacy arm says that figure is "not reliable" and adds: "[I]t's not one that we have ever cited; it's not one that we would ever cite." Furthermore, an epidemiologist with the cancer society told us that the way this figure was calculated was "really faulty."

There's much more, but the bottom line is clear: Michelle Bernard and the Independent Women's Forum are lying in order to stop health care reform.  

So why is MSNBC turning to Bernard to moderate a two-hour special about, among other things, "health issues"?  

Could it be that MSNBC is in favor of lying in order to stop health care reform

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by pros2pros2940 (September 09, 2009 3:16 pm ET)
      4  
      Knowingly allowing liars on your station should result in a license suspension or revocation.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NG_Officer (September 09, 2009 3:27 pm ET)
      2  
      This lie hits close to home and really ticks me off.
      When I was sent to Afghanistan, my family switched from private insurance to Tricare. My wife's Ob/Gyn would not take Tricare so she switched doctors. On her first visit, the doctor took her family history (numerous family members have had breast cancer including her mother). The doctor ordered a mammogram (she was only 33 years old) and found pre-cancerous cells. Upon further testing, they found the cancer but caught it early. If we hadn’t switched to (government run) Tricare, my wife would not have had her first mammogram for another 7 years. Imagine how much the cancer could have grown in that time.
      Tricare paid for everything (mastectomy, reconstruction, and tattooing) and the out of pocket expenses were capped at $1,000.00
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (September 09, 2009 4:34 pm ET)
      2  
      Because MSNBC is sooooo liberal?

      Another question: Why is the NAACP participating, too?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by historygeek001 (September 09, 2009 5:25 pm ET)
      2  
      So we already know that this program will be an ad for the insurance companies. And MSNBC is the "librul" station.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mightymo (September 09, 2009 5:35 pm ET)
      2  
      Why would MSNBC pick Bernard when they have Maddow...somethings smells bad here!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mhelms (September 09, 2009 7:43 pm ET)
         
      Also of note, the ad about breast cancer cites the Lewin Group, which has been proven to be part of the insurance industry. I always had a feeling that Bernard had "shill" stamped on her forehead.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Alby (September 09, 2009 10:02 pm ET)
         
      Why on earth would MSNBC allow a CEO of an advocacy group with a clear political interest and agenda to moderate a special about a political topic? The Moderator should be a journalist who will bring out all sides of the argument during the two-hour special. This special is no place for the CEO of a conservative women's special interest group.

      This is a clear break-down of balance, and MSNBC should change who moderates this special.

      Believe me, I don't watch MSNBC any more than I watch Fox. I watch Democracy Now and Grit TV! Never never never advertiser supported news!
      Report Abuse