About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Glenn Beck's New McCarthyism?

September 10, 2009 1:29 pm ET by John V. Santore

Glenn Beck has revived one of the most shameful chapters in American political history. Sen. Joseph McCarthy spent years ruining the lives of patriotic Americans serving in the United States government and beyond. He did it through fearmongering and baseless, unproven accusations. He combed the past statements and associations of loyal U.S. citizens and then shamefully accused them of being traitors bent on the destruction of the American way of life.

At a time when conservatives are unable to find new leadership or present new ideas to address the challenges facing our nation, it is perhaps fitting that their media leaders and spokespeople -- individuals like Glenn Beck -- have fallen back on a 60-year-old slander: communist. Beck's forum consists of his radio program, his nightly show on Fox News, and his books. The witnesses he calls at his hearings form the endless parade of political demagogues he hosts as guests. And one by one, he is targeting the president's advisers -- not based on their current actions or statements, not because of any actual policy initiatives they have proposed since President Obama took office, but rather through the use of guilt-by-association reasoning or because of cherry-picked comments from their past, often provided in a highly misleading context. It's just the kind of vitriolic irresponsibility that McCarthy specialized in, too.

WATCH:

Beck's fixation on a sinister communist threat undermining America's capitalist democracy would be entirely laughable were it not revealing of something more fundamental. Beck and the Right have consistently portrayed Obama as a Manchurian candidate bearing Trojan Horse policies. Thus, the president isn't a uniter but a secret divider. He doesn't love the America we have, hoping to improve it. Rather, he seeks to destroy it. He doesn't represent a triumph on America's path toward genuine racial equality. Rather, he seeks little more than obtaining reparations and the radical redistribution of wealth and power on a racial basis. Such a philosophy plays to the most distrustful -- and often, dangerous -- elements of our society.

Beck will not stop with Van Jones. Yesterday he dedicated much of his show to Cass Sunstein, Obama's regulatory czar, whom he portrayed as a crazed animal rights activist who believes that rats matter more than people. As was the case with McCarthy, his distortions will continue unabated until the public recognizes his campaign for what it is: a witch hunt. As journalist Edward R. Murrow said of McCarthy in 1954, "We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason, if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended from fearful men."

Such words could, and should, be spoken, too, of Beck.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by magnolialover (September 10, 2009 1:34 pm ET)
      5 4
      Which journalist though will take up this call to expose Beck, once and for all, what he really is? And that is, nothing but a fraud and a huckster.

      I have been saying this for months now, that Mr. Beck, amongst others, has been rallying the cry of "commie" and other McCarthy like actions. We're repeating a sad case in our history, and it will continue unabated I think through the entire 2 terms of Obama's presidency.

      At the end of it though, Beck will not be remembered as some "patriot" or American hero, no, he'll be remembered as a petty spiteful little man who brought nothing but hate and divisiveness (and possibly violence??) to American discourse.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Nightshade Q (September 10, 2009 1:44 pm ET)
        3 3
        No one could. The main difference was that back then McCarthy was not living in a different reality in the same way as Beck and his followers are now.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mustardman (September 10, 2009 2:09 pm ET)
        2 2
        He is a NOBODY. He has admitted to a history of substance abuse and is clinically diagnosed with Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. So basically this clinically retarded individual has been given a big soapbox. People should just ignore him not give him more attention. He and Limbaugh are not in a competition for who can stay the most outrageous things. It's nothing but theatre among whack jobs and the only people who believe them are glue sniffers.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (September 10, 2009 2:32 pm ET)
          5  
          I wouldn't pick on anyone because of their substance abuse. It happens to tbe best, and the worst of us, and I wouldn't wish it upon anyone. I have never had to deal with it on a personal level, but have had friends who have had to deal with it, and it's ugly.

          ADHD is no big deal, but it is a medical condition, and one that doesn't really contribute to the crazy spilling forth from Glenn's pie hole.

          We really can't ignore people like Glenn Beck, because their pulpit is too big, and too wide. We ignore them at our own peril, and they should not be ignored. Thinking that ignoring them will make them go away is wrong. Ignore them, they'll only get louder, and more crazy, because they'll think nobody is watching them, and trying to hold them accountable for what they're saying, and or forwarding.

          While Olberman, Maddow, and Hartmann have done yeoman's work in exposing Beck for the crazy man he is, we need someone bigger to take up the cause. They do great work, but as we've been frequently reminded here over the last few weeks, their ratings are not that great, and not many people see them take down Beck. We could use someone like say, Oprah, with her huge bully pulpit to take him down, and expose him for the moron and idiot he is.

          Don't laugh, a woman like Oprah holds incredible sway, and power, and has umpteen millions of viewers who will get behind her.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (September 10, 2009 2:59 pm ET)
            1 1
            I respect the fact that anyone can overcome substance abuse. However, in my observation and opinion many people who do are left with a vacuum which they fill with crazy proselytizing on profound matters about which they express absolute certainty. Sound familiar...Beck?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by mustardman (September 10, 2009 3:14 pm ET)
            2 1
            Ok let me revise my statement. The way forward is selective ignoring and action. Ignore the daily rants and get the sponsors to abandon him. So far the advertising boycott is going VERY well. The MSM (which also has ADHD) just cannot manage the ignore part.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by NMFreelancer (September 10, 2009 3:27 pm ET)
            2  
            Does Oprah do 'political' like this? Would she want to muddy herself in this crazy cesspool? It would be a good thing, but I don't believe she does. Unless, of course, Beck were to target her first, and, on a regular basis.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by gmohandasa (September 10, 2009 9:42 pm ET)
            2 1
            I can't wait till Stewart and Colbert finish their vacations. I think they could have added a voice of reason to all this crazy talk by Beck, and the FOX nuthouse talking heads.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (September 10, 2009 6:16 pm ET)
          2 1
          Well, I'm a drunk with ADD and I have never found that as an excuse to be a simpleton. Or worse, to exploit simpletons in order to turn them against their own countrymen in an attempt to make a buck.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Mitthead (September 11, 2009 5:51 am ET)
             
          He is a nobody? Is that why YOU are talking about him and getting your panties tied into knots about what he's saying?

          If he's a nobody then I sure wouldn't mind being one, too. No one in the history of television has taken such a dreadful time slot (5p eastern) and churned out as many viewers as he has. If he's a nobody then there sure are a lot of people who know about him, watch him, support his ideas (whether they are anti-republican or anti-democrat), and actually DO something positive with the information he gives them!

          The only "nobody" on television these days are the folks on MSNBC. NOBODY WATCHES THEIR FILTH and they DON'T WATCH on a regular basis! That must really irk you, eh?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by starkcr31 (September 11, 2009 11:06 am ET)
          1 1
          Yet he still makes more money in a week than you make in a year. I guess that makes you even more "clinically retarded". Also, the fact that you refer to someone with ADHD as "retarded" just shows your incredible liberal compassion that we're always hearing about.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by political_left-religious_right (September 11, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
               
            Yet he still makes more money in a week than you make in a year.

            Now there's a truly adult response! Starkraving, have you ever actually joined a thread and, you know, elevated it?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by dandelion (September 12, 2009 10:34 pm ET)
                 
              That's stock answer No. 2.
              Stock answer No. 1: He must be doing something right if the libs are so scared!
              No. 3: Yeah, that's why he's got the highest ratings, blah, blah, blah.

              It's the Bill O'Reilly metric of worth.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (September 10, 2009 2:14 pm ET)
           
        Which journalist though will take up this call to expose Beck, once and for all, what he really is? And that is, nothing but a fraud and a huckster.


        Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, and radio host Thom Hartmann have done a fairly good job at calling out Glenn Beck as the pathetic little insect he his!

        Unfortunately, with the current state of our media being corporate owned... it is not very likely that a larger more popular one will do it.

        Of course, if one with a large enough audience were to call Beck out, most of the rest of the right-wing slime will come to his defense.

        This country is in bad shape and I blame it squarely on the shoulders of all elected politicians that find it necessary to take dirty corporate money!

        Public financing of elections and forcibly taking 'human rights' away from corporations would be a major step in the correct direction! Yes, that's right... according to a fallacy and that no Supreme Court since 1886 has changed this illegal notion that corporations are people is a big huge problem!

        In 1886 after the case Santa Clara County vs Southern Railroad a Supreme Court clerk (a former top manager for... you guessed it, Southern Railroad) wrote this thought as a side note. Which shows his contempt to the American people and basically America itself, and had no legal bearing on the case, that corporations were people.

        Since then, several Supreme Courts over the years have decided cases based on that illegal notion. The clerk died before anyone knew it was written there and so has since been used as precedent.

        We reverse this trend... and we would all be the better for it!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Mitthead (September 11, 2009 6:07 am ET)
             
          I hate to be the bearer of bad news, captfoster...but...ahhhhhh...nobody knows who Olberman, Maddow, or Thom are!!!!

          Public financing of elections, huh? Yeah...I guess it is about time for us to just rip up the constitution and write something new...don't you think?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by highliter (September 11, 2009 1:11 pm ET)
             
          Unfortunately, with the current state of our media being corporate owned...

          You mean like GE owning Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by joeklein395301 (September 10, 2009 10:17 pm ET)
        1  
        If Beck is full of it, I wonder why Obama through Van Jones under the bus, Obama should have defended Jones, because once they get one it just whet their appetite to get more.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by joeklein395301 (September 10, 2009 10:23 pm ET)
          3
        Beck is a fraud, Van Jones has done a great work for the cause, Obama should have kept him.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Tamster (September 11, 2009 10:02 am ET)
           
        I totally agree, I absolutely refuse to listen to this man or Fox news. He needs to exposed and removed from Fox News.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by SrgVPMedia1120 (September 11, 2009 10:46 am ET)
           
        I agree with this. I know some people think that the amount of coverage Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, etc are getting should be curtailed, I think more responsible journalists should rise up to expose these frauds. These far right falsehood merchants have too big a bully pulpit and too much corporate money behind them to merely ignore. Media Matters, MoveOn.org and many other grass roots organizations are doing their best to discredit them , but maybe they need to focus on main stream journalists until they can find some that can pull a "Woodward and Bernstein" and expose these frauds for who they really are. A lot of the followings of Beck, etc only get news from mainstream resources (usually Faux News unfortunately) and they need to have a flood of truth from all sides, maybe it will sink in then
        Report Abuse
      • Author by alerek (September 11, 2009 9:18 pm ET)
           
        Mr. Beck, ur doing a great job.
        I really wish you would make clear to America the close ties..the $$$ support with Odinga Obama[know as the butcher of Kenya] and cousin Barack Obama .
        I have yet to here ANYTHING of this on any media station...!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (September 10, 2009 1:49 pm ET)
      2  
      What network would be broadcasting The Joe McCarthy Show if he was around today? Anyone care to take a wild guess??
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (September 10, 2009 2:27 pm ET)
        2  
        He'd be Beck's co-host.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bilbo_dies (September 10, 2009 9:06 pm ET)
             
          Only if he wasn't serving in congress at the time.
          Otherwise, FOX would bookend him with Beck. Beck's show would be first, and then McCarthy. They would also rotate as guests on each others show.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by joeklein395301 (September 10, 2009 10:35 pm ET)
          2
        Fox is at it again, today is ACORN , because couple of misguided employees gave advise to a pimp and prostitude how to set up their business they are raising hell, I am glad no self respecting news organization is cover this grap
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Mitthead (September 11, 2009 6:10 am ET)
             
          Heaven forbid Glenn Beck do some actual reporting on an organization that is being given a TON of taxpayer cash and who also happens to be directly tied to our current president!!! Heaven forbid!!!

          I'm absolutely positive that you'd feel the exact same way about, say...some sort of Christian organization if they were as connected to a republican administration. Yeah...I'm sure you'd feel the same, right??? Right???
          Report Abuse
        • Author by red dem (September 11, 2009 12:40 pm ET)
          1  
          Fox news did it home work on this one. They managed to find the one corruptable ACORN employee. Now there is a story on CNN that they found another one in Balitmore?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (September 10, 2009 2:33 pm ET)
      2 1
      The right never really abandoned McCarthyism. All of those terms like "class warfare", "redistribution of the wealth" and "cultural Marxism" are meant to demonize opponents and suppress dissent. It is why the minimum wage wasn't raised for more than a decade. It is why outrage over Professor Gates arrest, or police treatment of minorities in general is dismissed as a sinister scheme at equality through force. The same with labor and consumer protection issues. You are supposed to accept the right wing status quo or you are a Marxist revolutionary.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (September 10, 2009 2:47 pm ET)
        2  
        Also, there are plenty on the right, who now defend McCarthy and his tactics, and call him a great American hero.

        Tragic, but true.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NMFreelancer (September 10, 2009 3:16 pm ET)
          2 1
          Yes, just as they have annointed 'St. Ronnie of Reagan.'
          Idjits!
          With all those sponsors having bolted the Beck barn, even though he's drawing more train-wreck gazers than ever, I can't help but think that FAUX News is just waiting for the guy's contract to expire to dump him for the next loon in line.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by tuersm3856 (September 10, 2009 4:03 pm ET)
        1 2
        Glenn Beck is a slimebag, no doubt, but the reason McCarthy is so horribly portrayed in our history books is because he got a little too close for comfort when he started exposing infiltrated elements within the military and defense intelligence. It was all fun and games going after Hollywood, but when he caught on to the bigger picture, McCarthy had to be discredited.

        Incidentally, Communism has always been funded by the global banking cartel as a con job: to get people to lay down their human rights to some utopian illusion that ALWAYS, history shows, turns into a crushing death mill that has consumed millions upon millions of lives in the 20th century alone.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (September 10, 2009 4:55 pm ET)
          2  
          So what are you saying here? McCarthy was right?

          Because, he wasn't. Not even close.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (September 10, 2009 5:12 pm ET)
          2  
          The reason McCarthy is accuratly portrayed in our history as a bully is that for every supposed communist he exposed at lrast 200 other innocent lives were ruined by his witch hunt. he deserves a special place in hell for his "UNAMERICAN" activites.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Markie NYC (September 10, 2009 3:09 pm ET)
      3 11
      Whatever you all think of Beck, his uncovering of the REAL Van Jones was not a slanderous, vindictive rant – IT WAS ALL TRUE. But of course you worship jerks like Olberman – a vindictive baby that no one but left wing lunatics care about – who is precisely what you accuse Beck of. Typical leftist garbage, you all should move to Venezuela, you people are beyond hypocrites.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by overmars jr. (September 10, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
        3  
        Wannacracker?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (September 10, 2009 4:56 pm ET)
        3 2
        What did Beck uncover then that was so bad? What about Van Jones do you find so reprehensible? What has he done? And, for the record, a lot of the things Beck said he did, he didn't do. It's called truth, for a reason, and they're called facts, for a reason. Beck had very little of them.

        I personally don't worship anyone, definitely not Olberman.

        You're a typical piece of right wing trash yourself, who has nothing but spite for people who disagree with you.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dandelion (September 12, 2009 10:37 pm ET)
          1  
          Van Jones was guilty of being a liberal with power. That's all it takes to set off the alarms in Crazytown.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by jhill779 (September 10, 2009 5:05 pm ET)
        2 6
        Wow the first pro Beck comment Ive seen on this liberal website.(thanks)

        So you guys believe everything Keith Olberman tells you? Really?
        And to the poster below who calls people 'right wing trash' you have got to grow up buddy. Not everyone who agrees with Beck is right wing or trash. Its the liberals that are bringing this nation down. Lets spread the wealth around, subsidize everything, and hope everyone denounces christianity while were at it! That would be an awesome country to live in. Free to be me right? No rules or morality.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (September 10, 2009 5:11 pm ET)
          3 2
          Not everyone who agrees with Beck is right wing or trash

          Well, we know everyone who agrees with beack is a right wing nutjob. Whether they're trash depends on their income.

          Its the liberals that are bringing this nation down.

          Black is white. Up is down. War is peace.

          Your ignorance is simply priceless.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (September 10, 2009 5:16 pm ET)
          3 3
          I'D trust OLBERMANN long before i'd trust BECK.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Mitthead (September 11, 2009 6:12 am ET)
               
            By reading some of your comments, I'd say that's pretty obvious.

            Don't say stuff like "black is white" because you might be labeled as a racist by your buddies. But...then again...you might be able to get a beer at the White House, too!
            Report Abuse
        • Author by New Frontier (September 10, 2009 5:18 pm ET)
          3 1
          Its the liberals that are bringing this nation down.

          To sum up: When Beck says the President of the United States is a racist with a deep hatred of white people he is bringing our nation up. People who complain about that are liberals who bring the nation down.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Mitthead (September 11, 2009 6:18 am ET)
               
            Beck said that he has "issues" with white people.

            Yeah...ummm, I can't at all think of reasons anyone would believe our president might possibly have "issues" with white people!!

            I admire people who don't pull their punches. People like Imus, for example. They get kicked around, spit upon, trashed...but always find their way back to the top.

            Is it me or is it obvious that liberals have no regard or respect for the constitution...especially that pesky little first ammendment?

            Did Bush insist that the psycho Cindy Sheehan be silenced? No, he didn't. He let her rant. In fact, he let her and all of her followers (I think there were twenty-four of them) rant and rave ON HIS PROPERTY out of respect for a person's right as an American citizen.

            I know, I know...if it weren't for that darn constitution then you'd all have us living in such happiness and bliss! Hate to break it to you, but SO FAR you guys haven't been able to rid us from the rule of law that the constitution brings us. I'm sure you'll have your way if America continues on her current path, however.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by internet soldier (September 10, 2009 6:04 pm ET)
          4 1

          Yes, the liberals are bringing this country down with their insane, dangerous, post dark-ages agenda.

          Republicans on the other hand are pushing this country towards a utopian dream where government has no role other than to fight agressive wars, make sure everyone is good boy and goes to church on Sunday and to defend the heroic mansion dwellers from the dirty masses. Where only the rich can afford basic services because the government will not provide adequate roads, sewege, healthcare and education. Up by their own bootstaps as they say.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by dandelion (September 12, 2009 10:43 pm ET)
             
          So you guys believe everything Keith Olberman tells you? Really?

          When did Keith Olbermann become Beck's doppleganger? I'm not going to defend Olbermann, I find him rather pompous. But just because he's an outspoken liberal doesn't mean he MAKES STUFF UP or that he's got gullible followers who parrot everything he says. No, Beck is in a class all by himself.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (September 10, 2009 5:14 pm ET)
           
        markie, you really have your head up your rear end with that statement.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (September 10, 2009 5:21 pm ET)
        3  
        Olberman...a vindictive baby


        I remember a certain vindictive talk show host bawling like a baby on teevee, but it wasn't Olberman(sic).
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (September 10, 2009 6:18 pm ET)
        2  
        I don't know where you copied and pasted from Markie, but maybe you could go back there and bring some evidence back with you to support your contentions. So far, you have shown me nothing but ideology.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (September 10, 2009 9:17 pm ET)
        1  
        But; we wouldn't like Venezuela. It's on the wrong side of the equator and the water doesn't spin down the drain correctly.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Max Credits (September 10, 2009 3:22 pm ET)
      1 1
      Sorry for being slightly off topic but this boob is just too freakin' stupid for words.....

      Call your congressman on Sunstein and need investigation on ACORN


      He does not understand very basic sentence structure.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Mitthead (September 11, 2009 6:21 am ET)
           
        AHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Yeah, man! Way to go, Victor!!! You nailed him for not writing in a complete sentence...on a blog, no less!!! Oh, man...that poor, sad soul! You really got him!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pamom (September 10, 2009 3:39 pm ET)
      4 2
      Mr Beck waves the first ammendment around as though he should relieve him of any responsibilty for his decisive rhetoric. What he deliberitly misunderstands is that while the government can pass no laws to prevent him from speaking, others may indeed censure him and expose him for the fraud that he is. We must find those old-school conservatives who still have values (I do believe they exist, though they are few and far between), and ask them who among them is willing to stand up and say "Have you no honor, sir?"

      In the meantime, we must continue to have companies remove their ad's from his show, we must show up to his book signings in an orderly manner (protest, video tape, etc) and systematically expose him in every manner we can (youtube, blogs, pamphlets). Show the fear, the hate, the lack of information. I can tell you first hand that those on the Fox boards do not like it when you expose Beck as a fraud. I explain it to them as I can do illogical leaps too, and procede to connect Beck to the Nazi's because he's blonde (yeah, I know, but you have to be extreme with these folks!). There have been some excellent posts at dailykos that have run through his history of fear, bigotry, and outright lies. They give quotes and context to what he was saying.

      The man is dangerous. He is indeed decisive, as is Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly et al. I've been trying to figure out why people have thought that it was Obama that was decisive, and this was the piece that I was missing, so thank you!!!!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (September 10, 2009 9:12 pm ET)
        1  
        He is indeed decisive

        Sorry, can't help myself. I do believe you mean "divisive".

        di·vi·sive (d-vsv)
        adj.
        Creating dissension or discord.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Hula (September 10, 2009 4:47 pm ET)
         
      Republicans need to start ignoring these right-wing radio/TV personalities if they ever want to win another national election.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by starkcr31 (September 11, 2009 11:04 am ET)
        2 1
        Actually, democrats need to start ignoring it because apparently that's all they watch if this site is any indication. You need to get lives. You have control of virtually everything. Leave the rest of it alone.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by internet soldier (September 11, 2009 1:23 pm ET)
          1  
          "You need to get lives" says the man who left 150 comments on one of these threads.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by starkcr31 (September 11, 2009 2:35 pm ET)
               
            If all you people care about is getting rid of talk radio and Fox News, that's quite a lack of a life. Oh, and the fact that you took the time to count the amount of comments I have proves your lack of a life.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by internet soldier (September 11, 2009 3:27 pm ET)
              1  
              Then your obsession with media matters would by your own standard prove your lack of a life. Fail.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by internet soldier (September 11, 2009 1:27 pm ET)
             
          In the right wing mind "controlled by democrats" = not a g.o.p. propaganda outlet, but we already knew that.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by starkcr31 (September 11, 2009 2:35 pm ET)
               
            No, democrats control every branch of government as well as the media. Try to keep up.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by papa bear3 (September 10, 2009 4:52 pm ET)
      3 1
      In the confused world of Fox News where Nazism equals Communism, Joe McCarthy equals Edward R. Murrow. Up is down, when they need it to be, often in the same sentence.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by yancy derringer (September 10, 2009 6:34 pm ET)
      2  
      FYI... The Museum of Broadcast Communications has some good video of Murrow, including his take down of McCarthy. Short registration then search "TV" for "Murrow" in keyword. (lots of old political TV there also)

      Beck strikes me as fancying himself to be the Revillo P. Oliver of his time. I don't think Oliver had the theo bone which props up most Beck followers, however, I bet Oliver is Beck's secret hero.

      Been kind of surprised that Coulter hasn't written a book about how wonderful Revillo was.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Tobimaro (September 11, 2009 2:23 pm ET)
           
        Thanks for the link. I really think that we need someone of the stature of Edward R. Murrow to show the populace what FOX is all about. Unfortunately, due to the corporate climate of today, the best we might get is a YouTube sensation.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dewdrop_8171931 (September 10, 2009 7:08 pm ET)
      2 1
      I despise Glenn Beck with a passion. How come we cannot get this @$$hole off of TV?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by RightStuff (September 10, 2009 9:00 pm ET)
        1 1
        Freedom of speech, I guess. I think he is pretty much correct on most of his stuff, like 99.9%. I can see how it rankles the leftists, however. My contention is that leftists are those who either flunked their high school civics class, had a poor teacher who just handed out grades, or attended some backward public school that didn't require the course for graduation. What think ye?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by IowaDem (September 11, 2009 12:43 pm ET)
             
          I thought liberals where highly educated elitists? You guys really need to get your misinformed and incorrect attempts at insults straightened out! Beck right about "like 99.9%" of the time? Man, that is priceless!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by joeklein395301 (September 10, 2009 11:34 pm ET)
        1  
        Beck is not a public official, he can not raise your taxes, or put you in jail, he just says his piece, if he is full of it he will go away like many others who fell victom to rating, who are you to suppress free speech, how about tolerance, and freedom from bigotry.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by IowaDem (September 11, 2009 12:48 pm ET)
             
          Anyone can try to repress someone's free speech, it is only the Government who is bound by the 1st Amendment, but this has been pointed out so many times that I am sure this won't get through your right-wing intelligence-barrier that deflects logic and facts for lies and insanity.
          Tolerance for misinformation and lies? Why would you champion such a thing? I just don't understand that thinking. And where did the "bigotry" reference come from? Who said anything about his race or ethnicity? Do you even know what that word means?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by starkcr31 (September 11, 2009 11:01 am ET)
        1  
        Why do you care? I hate American Idol, but I don't give a sh*t if they're off the air or not, I just choose not to watch it. You may want to do the same with Glenn Beck. He's obviously getting you way too riled up.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by internet soldier (September 11, 2009 1:29 pm ET)
             
          Please tell me the last time American Idol had the majority of Americans believing Saddam was behind 9/11 or peddled other such destructive deception.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by starkcr31 (September 11, 2009 2:33 pm ET)
               
            Give me proof that Beck believes that and even if he does, what's the difference? So, he says crazy things? So what? Choose not to watch him.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by red dem (September 11, 2009 12:47 pm ET)
           
        Why do these Fox clowns get higher ratings?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by TruthMatters77 (September 10, 2009 10:17 pm ET)
      1  
      Let see now, Van Jones, didn't he himself say he was a communist several years ago? Hmmm, maybe Beck is on to something.

      Don't just listen to Obama's words, watch his actions. So far his "czars" look suspicious to me.

      The appointment of 30+ czars by Obama is an unconstitutional executive branch power grab.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by joeklein395301 (September 10, 2009 11:42 pm ET)
      1 1
      comparing Beck to McCarthy is really a false comparison. Beck is not a public official, he can not raise your taxes, or put you in jail, he just says his piece, if he is full of it he will discredited and go away like many others before him, do you remember Dan Rather, and for those who want his head , why do we want to suppress freedom of speech if we disagree , how about tolerance, and freedom from bigotry.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Mitthead (September 11, 2009 6:27 am ET)
           
        Thank you, joeklein. Thank you. You may very well be a democrat...but I don't care. What you just said was very well put, honest, and exactly on target. Thank you...it was refreshing to read your pithy, yet honest comment. Have a good one, man.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by tbone (September 11, 2009 8:30 am ET)
        1 1
        For the eighty billionth time, boycotting Glenn Beck, targeting his advertisers, writing to Fox to take him off the air, even petitioning the government to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine, IS NOT suppression of free speech.

        A suppression of your right to free speech is when the government tries to muzzle you, as an individual citizen, or as a group, peacably assembled, from stating what you want to state. If the US government were to pull Fox's license, THAT'S STILL NOT SUPPRESSING FREE SPEECH. It would be illegal if not done via due process, but it's not a FREE SPEECH issue. All the Fox dunderheads could still go stand at the White House fence and spew their Obama is a communist meme all they want.

        Jeebus Christmas, it's not that hard to understand.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by starkcr31 (September 11, 2009 10:59 am ET)
          1  
          If people stop listening to Beck, he'll go off the air. Until then, stop whining and stop listening to him. If he bothers you, all you have to do is not listen. How is so complicated for you?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by tbone (September 11, 2009 11:52 am ET)
               
            I do not listen to Beck. I am pointing out that those who attack his critics as usurping his Free Speech are making an invalid argument.

            I note you did not counter that point, just accused me of whining.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by joeklein395301 (September 11, 2009 2:06 pm ET)
             
          when the founding fathers put freedom of speech in the bill of rights it was really right to political speech, in order, to keep the government honest, I don't think they had the right of pronographers in mind. Tyrant always go after the media first, Hugo Chavez has closed over 200 media outlets so far and has made it illegal for anyone to criticize the government, is that what we want?. It is very dangerous that the media becomes the cheer leader for the government. it is unhealthy to just breathing our own air and be happy that we are right. Fox is the only decending view right now in the media , while the rest are in bed with the adminstration, I quite getting tired of the friendy media saying Obama is some Sort of God and name calling the opposition. If the government close down Fox under the cover of the community deversity who is left to give us the opposing view. Glenn Beck in his show ask the adminstration and their friends in media a series of question but sofar no body has bothered to answer him, but the name calling continues...
          Report Abuse
          • Author by tbone (September 11, 2009 7:15 pm ET)
               
            If you think my strawman about government closing down Fox (or any conservative media) is anywhere close to reality. . .

            If you think Obama is Hugo Chavez. . .

            If you think Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity and their ilk represent informed, loyal opposition. . .

            If you think Fox is the only decending(sic) [dissenting] view . . .

            I really can't help you.

            Glenn deserves to be called names because Glenn postulates moonbat theories and asks not just uninformed, but uneducated, stupid questions.

            “Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them...”
            Thomas Jefferson
            Report Abuse
            • Author by joeklein395301 (September 12, 2009 1:21 am ET)
                 
              I think it was Sol Alinsky who thought how to isolate and ridicule your opponents, well let take one of the Beck's questions and tell me why it so stupid, Obama advocates creation of a civilian army that is better organized and armed that the US millitary, please tell me who is the enemy.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by joeklein395301 (September 12, 2009 1:41 am ET)
                 
              May be Fox is full of it but it is the only one out there with opposing veiws, by the way it is the new diversity zcar at FCC who is advocating to raise the license fee and penalty for the opposition media so much to force them out of business, this is the same tactic is being used by Chavaz.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by minority report (September 11, 2009 1:51 am ET)
         
      Beck, and other right-wing extremists like to use the same technique of "red baiting" that was used by McCarthy and others on the now defunct House Un-american Activities Committee (HUAC). Refusals or hesitations to answer questions and accusations of communist activity resulted in their labeling the person as a "red" (meaning a communist or communist-sympathizer). So even a non-response was met with public condemnation. The person accused had to deny the charges and prove their loyalty or otherwise be charged with contempt if they refused to cooperate. This practice did destroy peoples careers, reputations and lives. What Beck and others like him are doing is really no different. But we can’t play into this game, which puts you on the defensive and distracts from the real issues.

      We simply need to be vigilant and call them out whenever we see this un-American tactic being used for political gain. When you think about it, the kinds of charges he makes are ludicrous and baseless, which means they are really personal ad-hominen attacks on the person he is labeling. Such behavior only comes from those who enjoy using these bullying tactics to put their opponents on the defensive. We need to stand up to these bullies and put them out of business just like HUAC. People have a right to their own political opinions, but not the right to trash people with lies and try to ruin their lives and careers with baseless accusations.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by joeklein395301 (September 12, 2009 5:42 pm ET)
           
        If Van Jones was such a innocent victim why he did not stand up and defend himself specially with all the friendly media at his disposal, why he had to resign in the middle of the night. Glenn beck used Van jones words against him. Now we have new regulatory Czar Cass Sunstein who advocates animales have right to attorney, what is next chickens vs. KFC, Cows vs Sizzler, where this adminstration find these beauties.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Mitthead (September 11, 2009 5:47 am ET)
         
      John Santore wrote: Beck's fixation on a sinister communist threat undermining America's capitalist democracy would be entirely laughable were it not revealing of something more fundamental.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, Mr. Santore, but the laughable part of Beck's work has been the FACT that he's using the very words of these very people! He's shown video, audio, transcripts, and interviews! What more do you need to swallow your pride and admit that there is a definite radical element inside of our White House? The only thing that's TRULY laughable is that the minority (that's YOU) who are still drinking the Obama Kool-Aid absolutely refuse to call a spade...a spade!!!

      For crying out loud, he is the ONLY person in America who spent time on his show exposing the wretched nature of ACORN today! He didn't opine, he didn't editorialize, he didn't opinionate...HE USED VIDEO EVIDENCE to ONCE AGAIN prove to the world that ACORN (a group our president has massive ties to) is the lowest of low...the scum of the earth...the epitome of immorality!!! What more do you need???

      If this were Bush and Haliburton (errr, Obama and General Electric) then YOU KNOW THAT YOU'D BE HAVING A COW! This isn't a "left vs. right" issue...it's a "right vs. wrong" issue.

      Man up. Swallow your pride. Open your eyes!

      ...by the way, I sure do love the fact that more and more advertisers are coming back to Beck just like I said they would.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by aviationrox (September 11, 2009 10:40 am ET)
         
      As a native of Wisconsin as well as a student of history, I can safely say that Joe McCarthy is the biggest blot on Wisconsin's political record. The fact that Beck is using the same tactics, same language, same fear-mongering as a man who smeared the reputations of dozens of innocent people is reprehensible. One can only hope that Americans wake up and stop listening to this "patriot".
      Report Abuse
    • Author by starkcr31 (September 11, 2009 10:58 am ET)
      1  
      I think this site should change it's domain to attackbeckandlimbaugh.com. I mean, that's pretty much all they do.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IowaDem (September 11, 2009 12:51 pm ET)
           
        Then you haven't been here very much. While those two account for MANY of the lies and misinformation that echo throughout the conservative-run media, they are hardly alone. Take your time and look around, you'll change your mind. If that's possible?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by starkcr31 (September 11, 2009 12:56 pm ET)
             
          The fact that you think the media is "conservative-run" is baffling. Other than Fox News, only talk radio is conservative.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by internet soldier (September 11, 2009 1:20 pm ET)
               
            Conservatives have loads of their own partisan trash news sources in every medium, whether it be newspapers, radio, internet or t.v. Anytime, Anywhere they can retreat into their own little world. But they wont be happy until there is no media outlet left to challenge their delusions.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by starkcr31 (September 11, 2009 2:32 pm ET)
                 
              I'd like some examples. Every newspaper and cable television news channel (other than Fox) is liberal. The internet doesn't count because there's millions on either side.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by internet soldier (September 11, 2009 3:37 pm ET)
                   
                "Every newspaper and cable television news channel (other than Fox) is liberal."

                Umm, how about the Washington times, the New York post, the Neocon Washington post, the Wall street Journal editorial page, the Christian Broadcasting network to name a few. And I'm really sick and tired of putting every right winger through a class on the subservient behavior practiced by outlets like Msnbc, CNN, ABC, NPR etc. during the runup to the Iraq war and the first half of the Bush admin generally. Not to mention the vindictive gossip practiced during the Clinton admin and the 2000 campaign. Its your job to educate yourself on these matters.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (September 11, 2009 5:12 pm ET)
         
      What Special Counsel for the Army Joseph N. Welch asked Senator Joseph McCarthy during the Army-McCarthy hearings can also be asked of Glenn Beck:

      "Have you no sense of decency sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?"

      [url=]For the entire exchange, click here.[/url]
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Jeremy Danials (September 12, 2009 3:22 pm ET)
         
      Glenn Beck, I hereby find you Guilty of betraying your Christian Faith by violating the First Commandment: "I am the Lord thy God, Thou shalt have no other gods before Me." The proof? Beck's Reaganism faith.

      Come to think of it, MOST right-wingers are giulty of this.

      Read "Tear Down This Myth" by Will Bunch to get the REAL scoop on Reagan. Then PWN the right-wing nutcases with their OWN idol, and help end the myth of "American Exceptionalism" at the same time.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.