Glenn Beck's New McCarthyism?
September 10, 2009 1:29 pm ET by John V. Santore
Glenn Beck has revived one of the most shameful chapters in American political history. Sen. Joseph McCarthy spent years ruining the lives of patriotic Americans serving in the United States government and beyond. He did it through fearmongering and baseless, unproven accusations. He combed the past statements and associations of loyal U.S. citizens and then shamefully accused them of being traitors bent on the destruction of the American way of life.
At a time when conservatives are unable to find new leadership or present new ideas to address the challenges facing our nation, it is perhaps fitting that their media leaders and spokespeople -- individuals like Glenn Beck -- have fallen back on a 60-year-old slander: communist. Beck's forum consists of his radio program, his nightly show on Fox News, and his books. The witnesses he calls at his hearings form the endless parade of political demagogues he hosts as guests. And one by one, he is targeting the president's advisers -- not based on their current actions or statements, not because of any actual policy initiatives they have proposed since President Obama took office, but rather through the use of guilt-by-association reasoning or because of cherry-picked comments from their past, often provided in a highly misleading context. It's just the kind of vitriolic irresponsibility that McCarthy specialized in, too.
WATCH:
Beck's fixation on a sinister communist threat undermining America's capitalist democracy would be entirely laughable were it not revealing of something more fundamental. Beck and the Right have consistently portrayed Obama as a Manchurian candidate bearing Trojan Horse policies. Thus, the president isn't a uniter but a secret divider. He doesn't love the America we have, hoping to improve it. Rather, he seeks to destroy it. He doesn't represent a triumph on America's path toward genuine racial equality. Rather, he seeks little more than obtaining reparations and the radical redistribution of wealth and power on a racial basis. Such a philosophy plays to the most distrustful -- and often, dangerous -- elements of our society.
Beck will not stop with Van Jones. Yesterday he dedicated much of his show to Cass Sunstein, Obama's regulatory czar, whom he portrayed as a crazed animal rights activist who believes that rats matter more than people. As was the case with McCarthy, his distortions will continue unabated until the public recognizes his campaign for what it is: a witch hunt. As journalist Edward R. Murrow said of McCarthy in 1954, "We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason, if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended from fearful men."
Such words could, and should, be spoken, too, of Beck.

















I have been saying this for months now, that Mr. Beck, amongst others, has been rallying the cry of "commie" and other McCarthy like actions. We're repeating a sad case in our history, and it will continue unabated I think through the entire 2 terms of Obama's presidency.
At the end of it though, Beck will not be remembered as some "patriot" or American hero, no, he'll be remembered as a petty spiteful little man who brought nothing but hate and divisiveness (and possibly violence??) to American discourse.
ADHD is no big deal, but it is a medical condition, and one that doesn't really contribute to the crazy spilling forth from Glenn's pie hole.
We really can't ignore people like Glenn Beck, because their pulpit is too big, and too wide. We ignore them at our own peril, and they should not be ignored. Thinking that ignoring them will make them go away is wrong. Ignore them, they'll only get louder, and more crazy, because they'll think nobody is watching them, and trying to hold them accountable for what they're saying, and or forwarding.
While Olberman, Maddow, and Hartmann have done yeoman's work in exposing Beck for the crazy man he is, we need someone bigger to take up the cause. They do great work, but as we've been frequently reminded here over the last few weeks, their ratings are not that great, and not many people see them take down Beck. We could use someone like say, Oprah, with her huge bully pulpit to take him down, and expose him for the moron and idiot he is.
Don't laugh, a woman like Oprah holds incredible sway, and power, and has umpteen millions of viewers who will get behind her.
If he's a nobody then I sure wouldn't mind being one, too. No one in the history of television has taken such a dreadful time slot (5p eastern) and churned out as many viewers as he has. If he's a nobody then there sure are a lot of people who know about him, watch him, support his ideas (whether they are anti-republican or anti-democrat), and actually DO something positive with the information he gives them!
The only "nobody" on television these days are the folks on MSNBC. NOBODY WATCHES THEIR FILTH and they DON'T WATCH on a regular basis! That must really irk you, eh?
Now there's a truly adult response! Starkraving, have you ever actually joined a thread and, you know, elevated it?
Stock answer No. 1: He must be doing something right if the libs are so scared!
No. 3: Yeah, that's why he's got the highest ratings, blah, blah, blah.
It's the Bill O'Reilly metric of worth.
Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, and radio host Thom Hartmann have done a fairly good job at calling out Glenn Beck as the pathetic little insect he his!
Unfortunately, with the current state of our media being corporate owned... it is not very likely that a larger more popular one will do it.
Of course, if one with a large enough audience were to call Beck out, most of the rest of the right-wing slime will come to his defense.
This country is in bad shape and I blame it squarely on the shoulders of all elected politicians that find it necessary to take dirty corporate money!
Public financing of elections and forcibly taking 'human rights' away from corporations would be a major step in the correct direction! Yes, that's right... according to a fallacy and that no Supreme Court since 1886 has changed this illegal notion that corporations are people is a big huge problem!
In 1886 after the case Santa Clara County vs Southern Railroad a Supreme Court clerk (a former top manager for... you guessed it, Southern Railroad) wrote this thought as a side note. Which shows his contempt to the American people and basically America itself, and had no legal bearing on the case, that corporations were people.
Since then, several Supreme Courts over the years have decided cases based on that illegal notion. The clerk died before anyone knew it was written there and so has since been used as precedent.
We reverse this trend... and we would all be the better for it!
Public financing of elections, huh? Yeah...I guess it is about time for us to just rip up the constitution and write something new...don't you think?
You mean like GE owning Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow?
I really wish you would make clear to America the close ties..the $$$ support with Odinga Obama[know as the butcher of Kenya] and cousin Barack Obama .
I have yet to here ANYTHING of this on any media station...!
Otherwise, FOX would bookend him with Beck. Beck's show would be first, and then McCarthy. They would also rotate as guests on each others show.
I'm absolutely positive that you'd feel the exact same way about, say...some sort of Christian organization if they were as connected to a republican administration. Yeah...I'm sure you'd feel the same, right??? Right???
Tragic, but true.
Idjits!
With all those sponsors having bolted the Beck barn, even though he's drawing more train-wreck gazers than ever, I can't help but think that FAUX News is just waiting for the guy's contract to expire to dump him for the next loon in line.
Incidentally, Communism has always been funded by the global banking cartel as a con job: to get people to lay down their human rights to some utopian illusion that ALWAYS, history shows, turns into a crushing death mill that has consumed millions upon millions of lives in the 20th century alone.
Because, he wasn't. Not even close.
I personally don't worship anyone, definitely not Olberman.
You're a typical piece of right wing trash yourself, who has nothing but spite for people who disagree with you.
So you guys believe everything Keith Olberman tells you? Really?
And to the poster below who calls people 'right wing trash' you have got to grow up buddy. Not everyone who agrees with Beck is right wing or trash. Its the liberals that are bringing this nation down. Lets spread the wealth around, subsidize everything, and hope everyone denounces christianity while were at it! That would be an awesome country to live in. Free to be me right? No rules or morality.
Well, we know everyone who agrees with beack is a right wing nutjob. Whether they're trash depends on their income.
Its the liberals that are bringing this nation down.
Black is white. Up is down. War is peace.
Your ignorance is simply priceless.
Don't say stuff like "black is white" because you might be labeled as a racist by your buddies. But...then again...you might be able to get a beer at the White House, too!
To sum up: When Beck says the President of the United States is a racist with a deep hatred of white people he is bringing our nation up. People who complain about that are liberals who bring the nation down.
Yeah...ummm, I can't at all think of reasons anyone would believe our president might possibly have "issues" with white people!!
I admire people who don't pull their punches. People like Imus, for example. They get kicked around, spit upon, trashed...but always find their way back to the top.
Is it me or is it obvious that liberals have no regard or respect for the constitution...especially that pesky little first ammendment?
Did Bush insist that the psycho Cindy Sheehan be silenced? No, he didn't. He let her rant. In fact, he let her and all of her followers (I think there were twenty-four of them) rant and rave ON HIS PROPERTY out of respect for a person's right as an American citizen.
I know, I know...if it weren't for that darn constitution then you'd all have us living in such happiness and bliss! Hate to break it to you, but SO FAR you guys haven't been able to rid us from the rule of law that the constitution brings us. I'm sure you'll have your way if America continues on her current path, however.
Yes, the liberals are bringing this country down with their insane, dangerous, post dark-ages agenda.
Republicans on the other hand are pushing this country towards a utopian dream where government has no role other than to fight agressive wars, make sure everyone is good boy and goes to church on Sunday and to defend the heroic mansion dwellers from the dirty masses. Where only the rich can afford basic services because the government will not provide adequate roads, sewege, healthcare and education. Up by their own bootstaps as they say.
When did Keith Olbermann become Beck's doppleganger? I'm not going to defend Olbermann, I find him rather pompous. But just because he's an outspoken liberal doesn't mean he MAKES STUFF UP or that he's got gullible followers who parrot everything he says. No, Beck is in a class all by himself.
I remember a certain vindictive talk show host bawling like a baby on teevee, but it wasn't Olberman(sic).
He does not understand very basic sentence structure.
In the meantime, we must continue to have companies remove their ad's from his show, we must show up to his book signings in an orderly manner (protest, video tape, etc) and systematically expose him in every manner we can (youtube, blogs, pamphlets). Show the fear, the hate, the lack of information. I can tell you first hand that those on the Fox boards do not like it when you expose Beck as a fraud. I explain it to them as I can do illogical leaps too, and procede to connect Beck to the Nazi's because he's blonde (yeah, I know, but you have to be extreme with these folks!). There have been some excellent posts at dailykos that have run through his history of fear, bigotry, and outright lies. They give quotes and context to what he was saying.
The man is dangerous. He is indeed decisive, as is Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly et al. I've been trying to figure out why people have thought that it was Obama that was decisive, and this was the piece that I was missing, so thank you!!!!
Sorry, can't help myself. I do believe you mean "divisive".
di·vi·sive (d-vsv)
adj.
Creating dissension or discord.
Beck strikes me as fancying himself to be the Revillo P. Oliver of his time. I don't think Oliver had the theo bone which props up most Beck followers, however, I bet Oliver is Beck's secret hero.
Been kind of surprised that Coulter hasn't written a book about how wonderful Revillo was.
Tolerance for misinformation and lies? Why would you champion such a thing? I just don't understand that thinking. And where did the "bigotry" reference come from? Who said anything about his race or ethnicity? Do you even know what that word means?
Don't just listen to Obama's words, watch his actions. So far his "czars" look suspicious to me.
The appointment of 30+ czars by Obama is an unconstitutional executive branch power grab.
A suppression of your right to free speech is when the government tries to muzzle you, as an individual citizen, or as a group, peacably assembled, from stating what you want to state. If the US government were to pull Fox's license, THAT'S STILL NOT SUPPRESSING FREE SPEECH. It would be illegal if not done via due process, but it's not a FREE SPEECH issue. All the Fox dunderheads could still go stand at the White House fence and spew their Obama is a communist meme all they want.
Jeebus Christmas, it's not that hard to understand.
I note you did not counter that point, just accused me of whining.
If you think Obama is Hugo Chavez. . .
If you think Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity and their ilk represent informed, loyal opposition. . .
If you think Fox is the only decending(sic) [dissenting] view . . .
I really can't help you.
Glenn deserves to be called names because Glenn postulates moonbat theories and asks not just uninformed, but uneducated, stupid questions.
“Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them...”
Thomas Jefferson
We simply need to be vigilant and call them out whenever we see this un-American tactic being used for political gain. When you think about it, the kinds of charges he makes are ludicrous and baseless, which means they are really personal ad-hominen attacks on the person he is labeling. Such behavior only comes from those who enjoy using these bullying tactics to put their opponents on the defensive. We need to stand up to these bullies and put them out of business just like HUAC. People have a right to their own political opinions, but not the right to trash people with lies and try to ruin their lives and careers with baseless accusations.
Correct me if I'm wrong, Mr. Santore, but the laughable part of Beck's work has been the FACT that he's using the very words of these very people! He's shown video, audio, transcripts, and interviews! What more do you need to swallow your pride and admit that there is a definite radical element inside of our White House? The only thing that's TRULY laughable is that the minority (that's YOU) who are still drinking the Obama Kool-Aid absolutely refuse to call a spade...a spade!!!
For crying out loud, he is the ONLY person in America who spent time on his show exposing the wretched nature of ACORN today! He didn't opine, he didn't editorialize, he didn't opinionate...HE USED VIDEO EVIDENCE to ONCE AGAIN prove to the world that ACORN (a group our president has massive ties to) is the lowest of low...the scum of the earth...the epitome of immorality!!! What more do you need???
If this were Bush and Haliburton (errr, Obama and General Electric) then YOU KNOW THAT YOU'D BE HAVING A COW! This isn't a "left vs. right" issue...it's a "right vs. wrong" issue.
Man up. Swallow your pride. Open your eyes!
...by the way, I sure do love the fact that more and more advertisers are coming back to Beck just like I said they would.
Umm, how about the Washington times, the New York post, the Neocon Washington post, the Wall street Journal editorial page, the Christian Broadcasting network to name a few. And I'm really sick and tired of putting every right winger through a class on the subservient behavior practiced by outlets like Msnbc, CNN, ABC, NPR etc. during the runup to the Iraq war and the first half of the Bush admin generally. Not to mention the vindictive gossip practiced during the Clinton admin and the 2000 campaign. Its your job to educate yourself on these matters.
"Have you no sense of decency sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?"
[url=]For the entire exchange, click here.[/url]
Come to think of it, MOST right-wingers are giulty of this.
Read "Tear Down This Myth" by Will Bunch to get the REAL scoop on Reagan. Then PWN the right-wing nutcases with their OWN idol, and help end the myth of "American Exceptionalism" at the same time.