About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Again: This will not end well

September 15, 2009 12:01 pm ET by Jamison Foser

Last week, I predicted that the furor around Joe Wilson's "you lie" outburst will end badly.  

The media was not only obsessing over the sideshow, forgoing yet another opportunity to actually inform the public about health care and the efforts to reform the insurance system.  Even worse, they were all but ignoring the substance behind Wilson's claim, taking a pass on the question of whether Wilson was correct or not. (He wasn't.)  

The media was not only allowing Wilson's outburst to divert the entire health care debate to a discussion of the relatively small matter of how, if at all, health care reform would treat people who are in the country illegally, they were repeating his false claim over and over without indicating its falsity.

That behavior has continued.  And, incredibly, reporters actually praise news reports that fail to examine the question of whether Wilson was telling the truth.  Take this Washington Post news report today: 1,300 words, not one of them indicating whether Wilson was right or wrong.  1,300 words, and it omits a central -- perhaps the central -- fact of the controversy: Wilson was wrong.  And Politco's Jonathan Martin praises it as a "good story." 

This will not end well.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by The_Cat (September 15, 2009 12:15 pm ET)
      2  
      Well, it certainly isn't going well, but how it ends is still up for grabs. While those who see this as he said/he said are the current drivers of the story, there is still time to change that. I think I'll take a little time out of my day today to call my local TV stations, and maybe write a letter to the editor.

      Part of the reason this is going the way it is, is due to the fact that we, as a nation, are all too often mere passive recipients of the media. Just like government, we can and should be involved in this process.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Major Tom (September 15, 2009 12:19 pm ET)
      1  
      Is it the media? Or, in the end, is it the American people who consistantly miss the point... The media in America is responsible, to some degree, for setting the tone and choosing the topics, but the American people are consistantly duped by nonsense. I think Bill Maher was on to something. It's still not cool to be informed, not in fashion to know history... But it is very in vogue to spread the latest gossip. Fox News loves to tout their ratings, but even they pale in comparrison to American Idol... It's systemic, it's pathological... It's stupidity... And Media Matters will continue to be a nook on the internet that preaches to the choir without an outlet to a more viewed medium, such as television...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Cannonball (September 15, 2009 12:26 pm ET)
      1  
      I read this kind of thing at MMFA and am so saddened that all the neews media is biased against substance and civic duty. Instead, they either do anything they can to support the GOP agenda or simply punt on contextual and substantive reporting.

      Then I read Glenn Greenwald at the Salon and am deeply dissappointed in our elected Democrats, Obama and the other centrists that constantly roll over for special interests so that nothing of the liberal agenda I so support has a chance of passing into law. We will continue to spend all our tax dollars on wars, supporting corporate profits and suppressing the middle and lower class.

      This nation is doomed to mediocrity and senseless bickering.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by phredicles (September 15, 2009 12:35 pm ET)
      1  
      This is a good example of how the media are not only capable of covering no more than one story at a time, but also capable of only considering one angle of said story. The story at hand is apparently whether Wilson's conduct was appropriate; pointing out that he himself was lying would exceed the limit.

      On interesting point: Wilson's ejaculation appears to have become the de facto official Republican response to the president's speech (who even gave the officially official one?). I'm not sure whether, in this media climate, that helps the Democrats or not, though: As Republicans see that such antics get ink, we may see more of them.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 15, 2009 12:54 pm ET)
      1  
      You're assuming it's ever going to end...

      ----------------------------------------------------------------
      Come over to my blog to debate health care
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kydem09 (September 15, 2009 1:12 pm ET)
        1
      It was a lie, as outlined here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/11/baucus-conrad-cave-to-joe_n_283246.html
      Report Abuse
      • Author by peace4all (September 15, 2009 2:10 pm ET)
        1  
        once again, you only post a partial truth. yes the baucus and pals added language to their bill to make the right happy. the trouble is, as i have posted here before is that the house version already had the language in it to deny coverage to those here illegaly. but if you read the various bills you would know that already.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kydem09 (September 15, 2009 4:20 pm ET)
             
          But there remained a loophole because the bill did not require verification of citizenship. So, using your terms, it was the president who told the "partial truth."
          Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.