About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

A President was killed the last time right-wing hatred ran wild like this

September 18, 2009 9:10 am ET by Eric Boehlert

That being John F. Kennedy, who was gunned down in Dallas, of course.

I've been thinking a lot of Kennedy and Dallas as I've watched the increasingly violent rhetorical attacks on Obama be unfurled. As Americans yank their kids of class in order to save them from being exposed to the President of the United States who only wanted to urge them to excel in the classroom. And as unvarnished hate and name-calling passed for health care 'debate' this summer.

The radical right, aided by a GOP Noise Machine that positively dwarfs what existed in 1963, has turned demonizing Obama--making him into a vile object of disgust--into a crusade. It's a demented national jihad, the likes of which this country has not seen in modern times.

But I've been thinking about Dallas in 1963 because I've been recalling the history and how that city stood as an outpost for the radical right, which never tried to hide its contempt for the New England Democrat.

Now, in this this month's Vanity Fair, Sam Kashner offers up in rich detail the hatred that ran wild in Dallas in 1963. To me, the similarity between Dallas in 1963 and today's unhinged Obama hate is downright chilling.

Kashner's fascinating cover story actually chronicles the professional struggles of writer William Manchester who was tapped by the Kennedy family, after the president's assassination, to write the definitive book about the shooting. The Vanity Fair articles details the power struggles, and epic lawsuits, that ensued prior to Manchester's publication.

But this unnerving passage from VF caught my eye. In it, Kashner retraces Manchester's step as he researched his book. It's unsettling because if you insert "Obama" for every "Kennedy" reference, it reads like 2009:

Manchester also discovered that Dallas “had become the Mecca for medicine-show evangelists … the Minutemen, the John Birch and Patrick Henry Societies, and the headquarters of [ultra-conservative oil billionaire] H. L. Hunt and his activities.”

“In that third year of the Kennedy presidency,” Manchester wrote, “a kind of fever lay over Dallas country. Mad things happened. Huge billboards screamed, ‘Impeach Earl Warren.’ Jewish stores were smeared with crude swastikas.…Radical Right polemics were distributed in public schools; Kennedy’s name was booed in classrooms; corporate junior executives were required to attend radical seminars.”

A retired major general ran the American flag upside down, deriding it as “the Democrat flag.” A wanted poster with J.F.K.’s face on it was circulated, announcing “this man is Wanted” for—among other things—“turning the sovereignty of the US over to the Communist controlled United Nations” and appointing “anti-Christians … aliens and known Communists” to federal offices.

And a full-page advertisement had appeared the day of the assassination in The Dallas Morning News accusing Kennedy of making a secret deal with the Communist Party; when it was shown to the president, he was appalled. He turned to Jacqueline, who was visibly upset, and said, “Oh, you know, we’re heading into nut country today.”

Manchester discovered that in a wealthy Dallas suburb, when told that President Kennedy had been murdered in their city, the students in a fourth-grade class burst into applause.

Today, conservatives are expressing outrage that Rep. Nancy Pelosi had the nerve to raise concerns about the onrush of violent political rhetoric. The Noise Machine claims it has no idea what Pelosi's talking about. But the truth is, America's most famous bouts of political violence (i.e. JFK, Oklahoma City, etc.) have always been accompanied by waves of radical, right-wing rhetoric. Given that history, the GOP's insistence that the hate now filling the streets couldn't possibly inspire violence seems woefully naive.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Koyaanisqatsi (September 18, 2009 9:24 am ET)
      17 4
      There is an group of republican leaders who, with their media-mouthpiece overlords are attempting to incite one of their minions to make an attempt on the chief executive's life. That is their goal, a successful attempt.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by kydem09 (September 18, 2009 10:54 am ET)
        5 13
        This is a completely baseless and reckless statement.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (September 18, 2009 11:04 am ET)
          11 5
          Wrong again. Due the racist smears and outright lies about Obama, threats against the president are up 400%.

          Baseless? I refer you to Dr. Killer, the baby killer. Or the guy who shot up the church and left a note saying he wanted to kill all liberals in Goldberg's book.

          Face it. The Republican party is the home base for liars and racists, and apologists for liars and racists.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by TomLan (September 18, 2009 9:44 pm ET)
              1
            Re: "Wrong again. Due the racist smears and outright lies about Obama, threats against the president are up 400%. "

            Wow! Wasn't it at all painfull pulling such a big number out of your ass?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by The Lonewacko Blog (September 18, 2009 10:06 pm ET)
            2 7
            From newsmax.com/newsfront/obama_secret_service/2009/08/03/243461.html: "While most of the threats were not credible, each had to be checked out and adjudicated." And, that's from a book; whether it's credible or not isn't known.

            And, as HotAir points out, Boehlert appears to be attempting to mislead his readers: he's not disclosing the Oswald was quite left-wing.

            P.S. If any HotAir readers want to twist Ed or AP a bit, see if they'll discuss this clear case of judicial bias:

            http://24ahead.com/judge-clay-land-shows-pro-obama-bias-dismissing-orly-taitz-b
            Report Abuse
          • Author by dencal263474 (September 20, 2009 8:25 am ET)
              1
            Anyone who opposes Obama will be called a racist. Just ask Bill Clinton or Geraldine Ferraro who were also called racist. When is enough enough? Real racism exists but the watering down of the word by the left is a disgrace.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by MikeMcK (September 20, 2009 10:55 am ET)
               
            Forghornleghorn, wasn't it the Democrats who were the segregationists?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by starkcr31 (September 20, 2009 1:48 pm ET)
            1 1
            Wow, you can up with a whole ONE example? That must mean all conservatives are violent. Am I right? Your garbage about racial smears are, as usual, based on nothing but your obsession with racism.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 20, 2009 5:37 pm ET)
                1
              Am I right?


              No, stark, your streak is still alive. You really have trouble seeing things in anything but absolute, all-or-nothing terms, don't you?

              OT, I saw your comment on the other thread (comments closed)re: entrapment. I wasn't as clear as I could have been;

              Whether video is admissible as legal evidence, especially in a situation where no crime has been committed,is irrelevant to an issue largely affected by public opinion when that video is edited and shown on a national "news" channel repeatedly.

              Is that easier to understand?
              Report Abuse
        • Author by bilbo_dies (September 18, 2009 11:09 am ET)
          9 3
          This is a completely baseless and reckless statement.

          Yup, and if someone makes an attempt on the presidents life, I am sure all the right wing blow hards will be sure to point out that they
          "never actually told someone to do such a thing".
          Report Abuse
        • Author by historygeek001 (September 18, 2009 11:35 am ET)
          1 3
          You're lying again.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by kydem09 (September 18, 2009 1:00 pm ET)
            3 9
            No, the lie is that some Republican leaders are hoping for a successful attempt on the President's life.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by jediknight65 (September 18, 2009 1:22 pm ET)
              10  
              then why are the covering for those people like beck and limbaugh who are skirting with fomenting violence.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by kydem09 (September 18, 2009 2:15 pm ET)
                  4
                Skirting with fomenting violence. That's an opinion that I don't happen to agree with. But let's say you're right, how exactly does that equate with someone wanting the President assassinated?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by heru (September 19, 2009 9:12 pm ET)
                     
                  the ku ku klan hides behind sheets
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Nelia (September 20, 2009 4:33 am ET)
                  1  
                  kydem09:

                  "...fomenting violence... ... how exactly does that equate with someone wanting the President assassinated?"

                  That´s about the line of logic that will show up after the worst has happened.

                  Plus: Re-read (or read?) the Rabin asasination. It happenend along the very same spiral of violence.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by PurpleState (September 18, 2009 3:46 pm ET)
              2 1
              I certainly do not believe that Republican leaders want that, and I certainly hope they don't encourage that, but when you are speaking to people afraid of losing their guns, some Republicans just haven't been able to calm their side down or have not even tried.

              However, there are people out there that are calling for the death of President Obama, and there are primary leaders in the form of extreme Christian pastors. I do worry that the religious right might follow that path and believe that they would be doing "God's work".
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 20, 2009 6:35 pm ET)
                   
                PurpleState, I agree that it's over the top to claim that Republican leaders are hoping for an assassination (although, I don't think it would be bad for many of them and their friends in the media to see or hear that, just to get them thinking, if nothing else).

                Fishergirl linked to a site that has quite a few photos of Bush protesters using death imagery. I don't think that's the most rational way to express disapproval, even if it's meant purely as hyperbole (and I think many on the right and left use it more metaphorically than literally).

                The anti-Bush stuff was different in one way at least; Most of the killing imagery was in response to war crimes and death due to his actions, whether right or wrong, at least it was suggesting a death sentence for murder. The hatred of Obama seems to stem much more from just not liking him, and being sore losers.

                The big difference to me is that, while there were individuals carrying these signs during the Bush years, there were no major media outlets egging them on.The Democratic party leaders were not pushing a slightly cleaned up version of the "Death to Bush!" sentiments.

                I don't think GOP leaders, whether in elected office or the EIB studio, want murder. Neither do I think a guy who goes out for 10 or 15 drinks and drives home at top speed in the rain wants to kill anybody, but he's not doing much to prevent it.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by erp (September 20, 2009 11:48 am ET)
                 
              That's ridiculous.

              1. Oswald was an upper-case Communist. He defected to the USSR. Somebody paid his way there and back and it wasn't the VRWC. Gee I wonder who is was????

              2. Killing Kennedy made him into a sainted martyr and caused the Great Society legislation to be passed which entrenched the poverty pimps and ensured that millions of poor would stay right where they are courtesy of the beleaguered tax payers and led to Johnson's complete mis-management of the Vietnam which caused ten of millions of deaths including over 50,000 of our soldiers.

              3. If Obama continues to show himself a totally incompetent narcissist, lefties might put out of the way if they can set up some Larouchie other nutcase to take the blame.

              4. The right has absolutely nothing to gain by removing Obama from office other than legally by discrediting and impeaching him for gross corruption.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Tbone Slickens (September 20, 2009 10:42 pm ET)
                 
              Which Republican leaders would that be? Credible links please...as always.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by pointofview (September 18, 2009 2:16 pm ET)
          5 12
          kydem09

          I agree. It is reckless and a blatant attempt to stifle any and all criticism of the Obama admin. Each time I think the radical left can not sink any lower, they simply develop a new standard of slime. These are the same people mind you who shouted down President Bush at ever turn, engaged in horrible and hateful speech, and put the President on wanted posters. MMFA has sunk to a pathetic new low here.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by political_left-religious_right (September 18, 2009 2:56 pm ET)
            6 3
            I agree.

            The quietest sound in the world is one troll agreeing with another. It is, after all, patting the back... of an empty suit.

            It is reckless and a blatant attempt to stifle any and all criticism of the Obama admin.

            Since you obviously don't know better, I'll have to point out a basic truth about liberalism--we welcome dissenting viewpoints. We think it's not only healthy, but vital to a functioning democracy.

            Each time I think the radical left can not sink any lower, they simply develop a new standard of slime.

            As opposed to the people on your side, who are keeping things honest, fair, and above reproach. Um, yeah.

            These are the same people mind you who shouted down President Bush at ever [sic] turn,

            Bush hardly ever, if ever, saw a protester during his reign of error. When did he ever get "shouted down"? Please provide a link to a credible site; for some reason, I don't think your word alone will do.

            engaged in horrible and hateful speech, and put the President on wanted posters.

            Examples, please. See previous comment.

            MMFA has sunk to a pathetic new low here.

            Folks, our friend pointless has sunk to a pathetic new low here.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pointofview (September 18, 2009 3:34 pm ET)
              3 10
              I'll have to point out a basic truth about liberalism--we welcome dissenting viewpoints. We think it's not only healthy, but vital to a functioning democracy.


              You had to be laughing as you typed that. The entire goal of MMFA, the entire mission of Pelosi, is to use fear and smear campaigns on anyone who opposes Obama. Boehlert may find great company in Oliver Stone, but get serious. To honestly imply that it was a right wing effort to kill Kennedy is absurd.

              Calls to bring back the "fairness" doctrine are poorly veiled attempts to control talk radio, to make it work better for the left. You post was the most absurd I have seen in ages.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by political_left-religious_right (September 18, 2009 6:19 pm ET)
                3 3
                You [sic] post was the most absurd I have seen in ages.

                Coming from yourself, who stands at a right angle to reality, I take that as high praise indeed.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Nelia (September 20, 2009 4:41 am ET)
                1  
                Pointofview:
                May I, with all due respect, suggest that you start to read...
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 20, 2009 5:52 pm ET)
                  1
                Calls to bring back the "fairness" doctrine are poorly veiled attempts to control talk radio, to make it work better for the left.


                Pointy, if you remove the "poorly veiled" part, I think you accidentally said something close to the truth there. Just as the Constitution is an attempt to control society, to make it work better for the individual.

                I'm personally not a big proponent of the FD today. It was more important when the sources of information were fewer, and I think anybody that clings to the right wing propaganda of Fox and talk radio despite the availability of credible sources is not going to be swayed by any time given to rebuttals at those same sources.



                Report Abuse
            • Author by MarkBoabaca (September 18, 2009 11:11 pm ET)
                 
              engaged in horrible and hateful speech, and put the President on wanted posters.

              Examples, please. See previous comment.


              Sorry if I'm a little late to the show.

              Some examples for your viewing (dis)pleasure:

              Bush is the antichrist

              Rioters burning bush in effigy, along with the American flag here

              Bush t-shirt with the 'S' as a Swastika

              Bush's face on a Swastika (t-shirt)

              Hitler and Bush on the same banner

              Another Bush is a Nazi photo

              "Bush is a psychotic murderer" sign

              Picture of a dog with a sign reading "I crap on Bushs"

              Bush being lynched in effigy at the "Insurgence Solidarity March" on April 10, 2004
              Report Abuse
            • Author by fishergirlusmc (September 19, 2009 1:40 am ET)
              2 2
              You can see all the hate signs against Bush here:

              zombietime.com/zomblog/?

              There are dozens of pictures for your perusal of many people calling for the death of Bush.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by PurpleState (September 19, 2009 11:30 am ET)
                   
                How about asking us here if we agreed with those posters? I certainly didn't agree with anyone calling for the death of GOP leaders, and I still do not advocate them either.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by sykes (September 19, 2009 2:36 am ET)
                 
              Here ya go.

              http://timepass.onlyfanpics.com/d/death-threats-against-bush-at-protests-i/125107024122.jpg

              Report Abuse
          • Author by PurpleState (September 18, 2009 3:51 pm ET)
            7  
            They've sunk to a new low? With this article?

            Look, I for one want to see criticism of a President's policies. I think that people have every right to disagree with something and encourage their voice in votes. However, I don't feel that the criticism should come with hateful words and imagery. Criticize a President for what he does by criticizing his words, not his appearance or labels provided by either side of the aisle.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by jwcoop715110 (September 18, 2009 9:15 pm ET)
          2 2
          That's their entire act. That's the gop platform.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by jwcoop715110 (September 20, 2009 8:45 pm ET)
          1  
          Nah, it's right on the money and the facts.

          When intelligent, thoughtful, patriotic Americans called Bush on his brain-dead gop-slop, we had the facts on our side, we didn't show up at his Potemkin town halls packin' heat and we didn't issue racist threats or resort to violence.

          On the other hand, the timothy mcveigh-followin', ignorant-teabagger, gun-show trash, clusterfox-watchin', astroturf, al cracka cretins showin' up in DC last weekend with more guns than brains for the 7 percent of one million moron march/unreality show fox drummed up with the help of dick armey's old corporate lobbyist firm were 0-everything when applied to those standards, sport.

          Get yourself a case and a clue or get used to it, little factose-intolerant fella.

          Always a pleasure.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by joedla1117 (September 20, 2009 2:48 pm ET)
        1  
        I agree:
        Watching some of the minions of these overlords, it is easy to see the extremely low level of intelligence. It would take very little to incite them.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Cannonball (September 18, 2009 9:26 am ET)
      11 3
      And should something be attempted, it will be by a fringe lunatic and the talking heads will call it an aberration that no one could have anticipated. Things don't happen in a vaccuum and I hold all of these haters responsible for the coming violence, whether it be racially-motivated confrontations, most of which are minor assaults that never get reported but build the momentum to true violence, or actual murders, on Beck, Limbaugh, Savage, Coulter, Dobbs, Scarborough, and Fox, and its owners.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (September 18, 2009 9:36 am ET)
      8 3
      In my opinion, this article does little to tone down the rhetoric, it could be fanning the flames a little bit.
      This is the first time I can remember anyone tying Oswald to the John Birch Society (even in a round about way as above)
      Were Squeaky, Susan and John also right wing nuts?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Major Tom (September 18, 2009 9:55 am ET)
        4  
        I agree somewhat with your critic, however... If there is a pervasive orchestrated campaign against the president, some wacko may just decide the enemy of my enemy is correct... It could definetely be argued that the environment in Dallas encouraged Oswald. Inspite of the ideological differences between him and the hate speech originators. He didn't have to attend meetings to agree with it, and become inspired by the seemingly mundane dissent all around him.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mk3872 (September 18, 2009 10:33 am ET)
        4 2
        Really? The first time? There is this really cool new search tool on the Internet known as "GOOGLE". Try it and you'll find many, many articles about the John Birch Society's anger and writings about JFK. It only takes a few minutes, just about as long writing an uninformed reply to a blog posting.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by spittinghotfireonrepukes (September 18, 2009 1:25 pm ET)
          4 3
          MK, you know that trying to get a conservative to read or do any research is likened to a skunk that smells good...They just don't!!! Republicans will remain clueless as long as they continue to get there info from the likes of; Drudge, Limpbaugh, Hannity and the other smelly critters on the right.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by oscar the grouch (September 18, 2009 8:15 pm ET)
          1 1
          Read again what I said. I DID NOT state that the John Birch Society never wrote anything inflammatory about JFK. I had never heard of anyone linking Oswald (with views as far away from JBS as you could get) to JBS (as far right as you can get).
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Ctmom (September 19, 2009 7:54 pm ET)
             
          That doesn't change the fact that Oswald was a communist. That he was motivated by the attempts on Castro's life. That he spent time in the Soviet Union.

          Try googling Randi Rhodes and Bush assassination. Leftists openly called for Bush to be assassinated. Who is unhinged??
          Report Abuse
      • Author by pointofview (September 18, 2009 2:18 pm ET)
        1 3
        Oscar.

        Great points. They are however, points the author and most posters here have no interest in.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Nelia (September 20, 2009 4:48 am ET)
          1  
          pointofview:
          How do exlpain that the threats against Obama rose by 400 %, according to official sides?

          Who is that, in your opinion?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by PurpleState (September 18, 2009 3:56 pm ET)
        4  
        I think the article is painting an image of the unrest in Dallas society when Kennedy was killed. I don't think anyone is stating that Oswald was a member of any of the right groups in Dallas, but I think the entry is trying to show that things were not all peaches-and-cream in the 60s either.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by oscar the grouch (September 18, 2009 8:20 pm ET)
            1
          There was some definite unrest in the 60s and some woeful, hateful wackos, just as there were in the 70s (ask Gerald Ford's biographer) and the 80s and the 90s and still with us. But if the President is trying to "make peace" with the likes of Russia and Iran with "speak softly" approach, doesn't it make a little sense that leaders of his party should follow his lead in regards to this as opposed to throwing fuel on the fire.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Tbone Slickens (September 18, 2009 9:37 am ET)
      4 14
      OMG...now we've got Eric joining Granny Pelosi as modern day Nostradamuses! Just a little projection E, with a strawman to boot!

      Since you didn't give any examples, what exactly were the "waves of radical, right-wing rhetoric" that caused the OK City bombing?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mk3872 (September 18, 2009 10:28 am ET)
        8 2
        Nice dig at Nancy Pelosi, there Tbone! Realllllll classy, my friend ...

        The radical right-wing rhetoric that led to OK City Bombing was the militia movement of Ruby Ridge and Waco, TX.

        But you could either look that up or already know it.

        I suspect you choose to ignore those facts.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Tbone Slickens (September 18, 2009 3:36 pm ET)
          3 2
          Ruby Ridge! You're kidding right! The arrest of Weaver was before the advent of "right-wing rhetoric". Weaver and Harris were acquitted and Weaver was convicted on two lesser counts. His (Weaver's) wife and son are still dead. Shot by the federal government. The wife while standing in a doorway holding a baby. That's some right-wing militia movement going on there. Sorry but I'm not buying it. Care to show us the "rhetoric" that caused the FBI SWAT team to gun down an unarmed woman and child?

          Waco had nothing to do with the "right-wing rhetoric" (your time line is off) and everything to do with the incompetent Janet Reno and the bumbling Clinton admin. Once again FEDERAL troops that burned down a building and killed innocent women and children. I'm seeing a pattern here.

          While one of the two convicted bombers in the OK City case had ties to a militia, I'm pretty sure he wasn't affiliated with them at the time of the bombing. Can you produce any empirical data that links "right-wing rhetoric" to OK City? Better yet, any empirical data linking the militia movement to OK City. The answer is no.

          Please LINK us up if you have data indicating otherwise.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by carlileb5935 (September 19, 2009 12:58 am ET)
            3 3
            How about all the incendiary material found where T.M lived, or in his truck, eh?

            That "empirical" enough for you?

            Another question-- how come not ONE right wing pundit has called for calm in these people?

            You know why?-- because the are deliberately FOMENTING hatred.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by starkcr31 (September 20, 2009 1:57 pm ET)
              1 1
              I love how you liberals such as yourself think these crazy people didn't choose to commit these crimes, but were driven to do so by Rush Limbaugh and the like. We are just Pavlov's dogs, just waiting for someone to direct us to kill. I guess that means that the nutcase that shot those military members in California a few months ago was directed by Keith Olbermann. From what I can tell, he incites far more violence than any conservative commentator.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Tbone Slickens (September 20, 2009 9:04 pm ET)
                 
              So incendiary material means automatic ties to a militia? So to answer your question, NO, that doesn't constitute empirical data.

              You'll have to do better than that.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by tb116 (September 19, 2009 11:38 pm ET)
               
            Right wing genius, look up the date of the OKC bombing and the "assault" in Waco. Notice any similarity? 'Cause McVeigh sure did.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 20, 2009 6:07 pm ET)
               
            The arrest of Weaver was before the advent of "right-wing rhetoric".


            Just curious, Tbone, when do you think right wing rhetoric was invented?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Tbone Slickens (September 20, 2009 9:01 pm ET)
              1  
              I'm assuming the implication was "right wing RADIO", so take it from there. It was mainstream (countrywide, not just large markets) by '93, so let's start there. You of course may disagree.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by tarheel6165 (September 19, 2009 6:06 pm ET)
          1  
          1. Oswald was a communist, not a right winger.
          2, The only Nazi/Hitler signs are from the LaRouche people who are left wingers.
          3. Compared with the left wing nuts during the Bush II administration, the current attacks on Obama are very mild indeed.
          4. I was a junior in college and civil rights activist in Chapel Hill when Kennedy was killed. The attacks to Kennedy were from the fringe right and left. 99% of the people in the TEA campaign are centerists or center-right. Their demonstrations have been peaceful for the most part. Exceptions resulted from physical attacks by thug Obama supporters.
          5. Protests of the type we are seeing now are patriotic in nature.
          6. Boehlart and Pelosi are fools and liars.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by pros2pros2940 (September 18, 2009 11:47 am ET)
        9  
        Over the top rhetoric from the right wing and financed by some of the richest people in the US. It is even worse today due to the coporate oligarchy in media : 5 companies control virtually everything you see hear and read.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by tbone (September 18, 2009 3:35 pm ET)
        3  
        Please change your handle, I was here first and your blather is now slandering the good name of steak lovers, Trombonists and energy venture capitalists everywhere.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 20, 2009 6:08 pm ET)
             
          He answers to Koko.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Tbone Slickens (September 20, 2009 9:15 pm ET)
          1 1
          Sorry. No can do. I was around before you. BTW I'm still trying to make that wind project work for you tree-huggers, but not enough of you ToFurky eating hippies want to buy into billion dollar wind farms when your natural gas is cheap. Also Barry didn't come through with his promise in the Porkulus Bill last Feb that would have bankrolled this baby on the backs of you suckers. It's a sad day for me...but hey...I'm a BILLIONAIRE!!!!!!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by terrapin53 (September 18, 2009 9:39 am ET)
      12 3
      Did anyone see John Boehner's comment after Pelosi made hers? He said stuff like people are afraid of any change, they are scared with what is going on, etc. Is it not his responsibility as an american to try to put those kinds of fears to rest and not stoke the fire even more? Until someone comes out on the right side and starts to slam Fox, Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity and all the others we are going to be stuck in this mode. And yes, some nut out there is going to do something stupid and that stupidity will lay right at the feet of the Republican party allowing all the hate, smears, and BS to go on non-stop.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by The New Pilgrims (September 18, 2009 10:40 am ET)
        4  
        Go read the blog Little Green Footballs. Seriously, I'm not kidding. Especially the comments section. I read it yesterday for the first time in years and was AMAZED to see Charles Johnson and most of his commenters angrily denouncing Limbaugh, Beck, et al.

        And no, it's not the same as right-wing leadership denouncing it ... but it is at least a start, an indication that there is a not insignificant number of right wingers who are trying to stop Limbaugh, Beck, et al.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by all your eyes (September 18, 2009 3:23 pm ET)
          1  
          Any of them that can do math and would like to see Republicans out of exile must be extremely upset with the current state of affairs.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by PurpleState (September 18, 2009 3:58 pm ET)
          1  
          Granted, Johnson has his own extreme right-wingers to handle over there...
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Bill R in Oakland (September 18, 2009 12:14 pm ET)
        1  
        The Boner also said "there's a political rebellion going on in this country right now". To me, that is tacit endorsement of the hateful rhetoric.

        Boner, the revolution started in November 2008 when our guy won. Suck it up.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by grunt (September 18, 2009 2:36 pm ET)
           
        You mean like the violence at military recruiting centers during the Bush Administration? The 2 soldiers murdered in the spring by a crazy person? Can we blame the left for all of those actions because of their malicious anti-war movement? What about the pro-lifer murdered last week? Can we blame pro-choice rhetoric for that?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pamom (September 18, 2009 10:15 am ET)
      1  
      The secret service has reported that threats against the President are at record levles, yet people doubt the hate filled rhetoric on the street? With people like Beck claiming the President has a "deep-seated hatred of white people" and Limbaugh saying that a school bus fight between a black student and white is "Obama's America", how can anyone claim the rhetoric is anything less than dangerous? How, when Fox actually stated that they intended to "bring Obama down", can they claim they are not inciting violence. Maybe they do not mean to bring him down with a bullet, but that won't stop the crazy who thinks it does......
      Report Abuse
    • Author by vwcat (September 18, 2009 10:58 am ET)
      8 2
      the leaders of the right want Obama to fail so they will be voted back into power.
      However, in their insane quest, they have become so irresponsible and vitriolic that they don't see what this kind of hate talk and lies and turning up the heat will lead to.
      And when tragedy strikes, will they even own up to or reassess their behavior? Of course not. The first thing they will do is look for someone to point fingers at and refuse to accept the responsibility for their actions that they are always lecturing about.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by drphonic (September 18, 2009 1:16 pm ET)
        3 1
        I disagree: I think republican leaders & politicians are well aware of where their insinuations, etc will lead. It's just that they are just evil, evil monsters.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (September 18, 2009 11:47 am ET)
      8 1
      Has anyone seen the movie recently in theaters and now showing on HBO called "The Express"? If not, I'd recommend it.

      It describes the difficulties of a young black man playing football in Syracuse, NY, a pretty liberal college town up north. Ernie Davis, the first black man to win the Heisman Trophy, so clearly a very talented football player, was heckled and physically attacked when his team played against West Virginia and later against Texas in the Cotton Bowl. He was great, yet they treated him very poorly simply because of the color of his skin. The 3 blacks on his team couldn't stay in the reserved hotel rooms in Dallas in 1960 because they didn't allow people with black skin to contaminate the sheets. They couldn't remain in the awards banquet (where Davis collected the MVP award for that year's Cotton Bowl) because of the color of their skin.

      There was a ton of hatred back in that timeframe in that neck of the woods. We've come a long way since then, and there is a significant proportion of those on the right who seem still to be stuck back in that era.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dmhack (September 18, 2009 11:57 am ET)
      7  
      I think there's such a poisoned atmosphere in this country today that violence is inevitable. The right, whether its their on air multi-millionaire hate mongers or their 'go along to get along' weak leadership, seems hell bent on objectifying Obama to the point that he is no longer a human being.

      I see many trolls here who seem incapable of anything more than insults and parroting talking points when critical thought on both sides is what we need most of all. And make no mistake, I sometimes cringe at how we on the other side respond to these trolls when perhaps the best response would be to say nothing at all.

      As a nation, I think we have stopped listening to the rational voices and turned our attention to the loudest ones. A good portion of our population embraces lies as truth either because they are poor informed or the lies reinforce their narrow view of what they want this country to be.

      The only people who really win are the likes of Rush and Glenn as they enrich themselves by encouraging hate.

      In the end, the only real truth--the truth the right will always deny--is that this country is changing and there is nothing they can say or do to prevent that. It is as inevitable as the violence I fear is close at hand.

      Violence is the last resort of people who have nothing left to offer.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by aBeck in 10-O-C (September 18, 2009 1:31 pm ET)
           
        Well said, sir.
        I read the comments on right wing sites as well as liberal sites.
        Righties hate liberals. We make them crazy. In their very guts they are convinced that all liberals are brainwashed, stupid, mindless stooges who both believe and propagate nothing but lies. Their comment sections are literally mirror images of all that you will read here at MMfA or similar sites.
        To borrow from Star Trek mythology, I see a Borg culture on the right, where resistance is futile.
        There is an intractable cultural and ideological divide that is hopelessly vaccinated against any possibility of rational discourse. It is pointless.
        So there you have it.....in a nutshell (pun intended)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by drphonic (September 18, 2009 1:13 pm ET)
      3 1
      I don't understand: where the fck is the FBI in all of this? What, is it only illegal to threaten the life of a white president?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Meremark (September 18, 2009 1:44 pm ET)
        2 1
        -
        (Mueller's) FBI never has demonstrated the practice nor acted for a preventative policy of stopping plotters of mayhem disfiguring Domestic Tranquility, over the years.




        [http://www.guerrillacampaign.com/bush.JPG]
        (Photo shown here.)
        .


        Simply google 'message to j edgar hoover from bush about oswald' and so find historic Narrative 1 and Narrative 2 -- as this excerpt:


        Bush Crime Family S.O.P. — Use a Patsy
        Strange how history repeats itself when it comes to the Bush[es] .... What’s ironic, the right person often seems to be a former business partner or their close relative.
        First case in point, John Hinckley ...
        Second case in point, Saddam Hussein ...
        Third case in point, Manuel Noriega ...
        Fourth case in point, Osama bin Laden ...
        Oh yeah. There’s another important historical precedent ... to make Lee Harvey Oswald out as the patsy on November 22, 1963. ... His name and contact info were in the late George de Mohrenschildt’s address book, along with that of George Herbert Walker Bush “Poppy.”


        Past is prologue?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Tbone Slickens (September 18, 2009 4:09 pm ET)
          2 7
          ************TIN FOIL HAT ALERT*****************************

          Dude. You should like...get this info out to the masses! Don't waste your time on MMfA...I'd send this to every TV outlet in your area. Quick. Time is of the essence!

          I can see the headlines now:

          H.W. BUSH IN ON JFK PLOT!
          Meremark hero!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by proudconservative (September 18, 2009 6:17 pm ET)
            2 7
            Tbone,

            Can these people get any nuttier?

            Just a financial tip for your consideration related to these lefty whackjobs, georgy porgy soros is buying up tin foil reserves as we speak. Do you think he's speculating on more merrymarks to pop up and will allow him to run off with a few extra billion dollars?

            Speaking truth to/about progressives
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Meremark (September 18, 2009 8:19 pm ET)
              1  
              goofball du-ew-ew-ewds -- you forgot to poke the thumbs-down

              Report Abuse
            • Author by Tbone Slickens (September 18, 2009 10:29 pm ET)
                5
              I try to turn away...but just can't keep my eyes off the train wreck!

              It is a constant source of entertainment.

              BTW...thanks for the tip! We'll be rich along with that carbon footprint indulgences booth in the San Fran airport...rolling in the cash.

              People making money...that'll make 'em wet the beds around here.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by PurpleState (September 19, 2009 11:37 am ET)
              2  
              I'd wear tin foil clothing. Recycled from used metal and recyclable into other forms of clothing. Totally ecological!

              But so far I have yet to find any in the neighborhood stores. I've heard you can only really buy them under the "GLB" designer line. Too bad.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by tuersm3856 (September 20, 2009 7:05 am ET)
          1 1
          Oh my God! You actually look up and (gulp) read declassified government documents to learn about history?

          ******************TIN FOIL HAT ALERT********************
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 20, 2009 6:18 pm ET)
               
            I thought that was pretty funny too. The ones who deal almost exclusively in hallucinations, speculation and emotional fabrications are just doubled over with laughter at a very interesting post with an actual document supporting it.

            Maybe the "Tin Foil Hat Alert" is a notice to the other wingnuts to put theirs on to keep the reality out.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Tbone Slickens (September 20, 2009 10:50 pm ET)
              1 1
              Let me guess....you're a Truther too!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 21, 2009 12:56 am ET)
                   
                Nope. Wrong again. Congrats on your streak.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Tbone Slickens (September 21, 2009 6:28 am ET)
                  1  
                  Oh come on! Not a kernel of doubt? You know you WANT to believe it. It's whispered in the school yard...behind closed doors, and in Barry's admin (although he used the a-hole word and got canned). You can't be far behind!
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by dencal263474 (September 20, 2009 8:31 am ET)
             
          Please adjust your tin foil hat. It is causing static on my screen.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by s3v3rus (September 19, 2009 10:55 pm ET)
           
        What threat and from whom? Name them if you aren't talking out your butt.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Samurai Cowboy (September 18, 2009 2:07 pm ET)
         
      When are people like Rush, Sean, Bill 'O, Glenn, Michael Savage and others on the Right going to be brought up on charges of Sedition? This is an honest question because they are advocating the overthrow of the government.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by grunt (September 18, 2009 2:31 pm ET)
         
      Yes, because no liberals ever said things like, "Where is Lee Harvey Oswald when you need him?" and "If Cheney's pace maker would just fail one time this whole problem would be solved" during the Bush administration. No one ever made a movie laying out an assassination attempt on W's life. I hate to inform everyone in here that HATE exists on both side. Neither side can claim a monopoly on crazies. Poll's have also shown that 33% of democrats are 9/11 truthers? Is that not a fringe idea? I'm not pleading innocence for the right, but to act as though the left has clean hands is not only dishonest, it is disrespectful.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ernie1241 (September 18, 2009 4:39 pm ET)
         
      I'm not sure I follow the logic of this article. JFK was assassinated by a Marxist -- not by an adherent of extreme right ideology.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by AJHidell (September 18, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
         
      I might agree that the inflammatory rhetoric from the Right is as ugly as I've ever seen, HOWEVER, your analogies to the past are amazingly inaccurate: JFK was killed by a LEFTY, and MILK and MOSCONE were killed by a guy with a personal grudge over losing his job. In fact MOST, if not all attacks on US presidents came from the LEFT. Can you say Squeaky Fromme?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by proudconservative (September 18, 2009 6:20 pm ET)
      3 4
      Hey ERIC!!!!

      Oswald was a friggin COMMUNIST !!!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by apetra (September 20, 2009 12:42 pm ET)
           
        I think it's clear that Eric Boehlert doesn't think Oswald killed Kennedy.

        Eric has thus revealed himself as a JFK conspiracy theorist, a loon standing alongside the Truthers, the Birthers, UFO nuts and more.

        This is quite a revelation about Media Matters. It seems that, at least here, the truth doesn't.

        Another link, this time directly to the haute couture of Left-wing presidential assassination chique for the last eight years:

        http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Q235 (September 18, 2009 7:49 pm ET)
         
      I am just as concerned as anyone about the radical and hateful speech coming out of the likes of Limbaugh, Beck, and their followers since the election. However, I have to say that Boehlert's analogy misses the mark here.

      Oswald was a left wing nut, with a penchant for violence, and had shown a willingness to kill people he disagreed with (General Walker) prior to killing Kennedy.

      No doubt there was right wing hysteria in Dallas in 1963, but to link the two through nothing but speculation is just as bad as what Fox News does with Acorn/Obama and considering the geeneral topic it could be argued-- worse.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MagCynic (September 18, 2009 9:46 pm ET)
      2 3
      I didn't know JFK's killer was a member of the right-wing. That's news to me.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by FeralCat (September 18, 2009 11:26 pm ET)
           
        I am old enough to remember a news report after JFK had been shot, but before Lee Marxist Harvey Oswald had been caught, that said it was thought to be 4 members of the John Birch Society that did it. I am sure they were very disappointed.

        Oswald was a big supporter of Castro, rather like Obama is a big supporter of Zelaya. If Obama had been older he probably would have been a supporter of Castro and he might have beat Oswald to shooting JFK. That anyway make a lot more sense than the theme of this goofy article.

        I think that those at “Media Matters” are suffering from the delirium tantrums. Somebody better check the ventilation over there.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by tb116 (September 19, 2009 11:45 pm ET)
           
        Seriously, this is the defense of the morons on the Right? Oswald was a Commie. Oswald was clinically insane, you tools. Boehlert's argument is not about Oswald, it's about the persuasive attitude in Texas at that time. The fact that Dallas was considered full of crazies and nuts must be a secret only to people who don't know anything.


        Learn to read more than Allahpundit, righties, you might feel like you understand the world a little.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Tbone Slickens (September 21, 2009 6:32 am ET)
        1 1
        It's news to all of us. They just make this stuff up on the fly. It's been close to fifty years ago, so maybe the sheeple will not notice! It's the worse kind of projection and E should be ashamed.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Geedumb (September 18, 2009 10:00 pm ET)
         
      That's true Lee Harvey was an agent of the GOP. The Kennedy's all died due to the GOP!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by FeralCat (September 18, 2009 11:04 pm ET)
         
      I am old enough to remember a news report after JFK had been shot, but before Lee Marxist Harvey Oswald had been caught, that said it was thought to be 4 members of the John Birch Society that did it. I am sure those who reported that were very disappointed.

      Oswald was a big supporter of Castro, rather like Obama is a big supporter of Zelaya. If Obama had been older he probably would have been a supporter of Castro and he might have beat Oswald to shooting JFK. That certainly makes more sense than the moronic thesis of this airhead article.

      I think that those at “Media Matters” are suffering from the delirium tantrums. Somebody better check the ventilation there.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by HotWings (September 19, 2009 12:25 am ET)
      3 4
      This editorial is absolute garbage. Shame on you, Eric Boehlert.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Gringo (September 19, 2009 11:30 pm ET)
           
        When Lee Harvey Oswald, nobody's definition of a right-winger, is the killer of JFK, this shows the utter nonsense of this article.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jacksprat (September 19, 2009 2:43 am ET)
         
      Why isn't it mentioned that the man who killed JFK, Lee Harvey Oswald, was a Marxist sympathizer who actually emigrated to the Soviet Union when he was 19?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Harvey_Oswald

      He was definitely not "right-wing".

      Those of you who bought this explanation at face-value had better check your emotions at the door, and start looking at the facts: your freedoms are being taken away by a con-man.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sharpe3884 (September 19, 2009 6:29 am ET)
         
      Especially when the hate is carrying loaded weapons around in their left hand and their Barack Osama Bin Ladin poster in their right.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ernie1241 (September 19, 2009 9:44 am ET)
         
      The logic of this editorial escapes me. Oswald was a Marxist -- not an adherent of extreme right ideology.

      Obviously, his motivations did not originate from his belief in the content of books, articles, speeches, containing "right wing hatred".
      Report Abuse
    • Author by big2xrube6146 (September 19, 2009 1:12 pm ET)
      1 1
      I don't care if any of you here are right or left but what Eric and Polosi is saying is very true. If the BS that is being spread by FOX and these so called Conservative talkers isn't toned down a president could be assassinated. If it does happen there will be a rebellion to the likes that has never been seen. Lets hope it never happens because it will bring this great country of ours to its knees and take years to get over it. All it takes is one looney that believes in some of the BS out there and it could happen.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MagCynic (September 19, 2009 5:38 pm ET)
          1
        It's not going to be the conservative movement or Fox News that kills anybody. It will be some crazy guy. It's as simple as that. The person that gunned down that abortion doctor wasn't part of any conservative, pro-life mob; he was a loon. The person that shot the pro-life protester wasn't part of any liberal, pro-choice mob; he was a loon. If somebody - God forbid - shoots our President, will you all blame Fox News? That's insane.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by big2xrube6146 (September 19, 2009 8:47 pm ET)
             
          Thats what I'am talking about. Fox and the so called conservative talkers will be blamed. Think about it. Who is doing all the hate talk?
          It's coming out of the mouths of Fox and conservative talkers. And they will be blamed. They will not be convicted because of their free speech rights. But if the president is assassinated there will be roits and roiters will probably be going after these hate talkers, plus anyone else that gets in the way. This is a bad situation, and it's getting worse everyday. I hope I'am wrong and lets hope it never happens.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by MagCynic (September 19, 2009 9:48 pm ET)
               
            I watch FNC all the time, though. What is the hate speech you're referring to? The morning shows are always relaxed and certainly fair to the material. The evening shows certainly present a specific point of view but I wouldn't call it hate speech.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by dencal263474 (September 20, 2009 8:36 am ET)
                 
              I agree. In fact the only place to see REAL Debate between left and right is FOX. Yes they lean right no doubt but I get to see debates between Lanny Davis and O'Reilly. Beckel and Hannity etc etc. Debates with Geraldine Ferraro and dozens of others. I watch CNN and see a panel on the Situation Room of Blitzer, Malveaux, Jeff Toobin, Roland Martin and Jack Cafferty all spewing left wing bs. On occasion Matthews will attempt debate. Olbermann never. And yes I did see Liberal Anthony Weiner destroy Joe Scarborough a few weeks ago on healthcare. But overall FOX is the best place for debate.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by tb116 (September 19, 2009 11:47 pm ET)
             
          He wasn't? That must be news to the violent anti-abortion sites he posted on and to Randall Terry, an official Republican, who could barely bring himself to condemn Tiller's killer.

          Do you guys generally read ANYTHING besides Hot Air and World Net daily?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by pcbirddog22079 (September 19, 2009 1:43 pm ET)
         
      Never mind that Kennedy's assassin was communist, not an "ultra conservative." Think harder, Eric.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rskazimer1517 (September 19, 2009 4:15 pm ET)
         
      If all the Bush Administration's Patriot Act, and Homeland Security protections against "domestic terrorists" are still in play, President Obama should use them to their fullest extent of the law. "I'm sorry" for a few false arrests is far better than "I'm sorry for your loss" from an act of right wing terrorism. Remember: Not all Republicans are domestic terrorists. But all domestic terrorists have been Republicans.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by deadlywit (September 19, 2009 4:20 pm ET)
         
      You do realize that Kennedy's murderer was hardly a right winger, don't you?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by KingAlbert (September 19, 2009 8:07 pm ET)
         
      The single most important observation to take away from this article is the degree to which the author is prepared to launder the facts to fit a narrative. Right wing protests = assassinated president. Except, of course, Kennedy was not killed by a Bircher, or any other kind of right winger. He was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald, a committed communist. A man so in love with communist ideology he moved to the Soviet Union to experience it first hand. So if you're concerned about the President's health than perhaps you should watch the actions of disgruntled leftists.

      With regards to the breathless claims that [paraphrased], "never in my lifetime has such vitriol been directed at a President", then you have my deepest sympathies as you've obviously been in a coma the last seven years. I hope your recovery is going well. To help you get back up to speed I'll submit the following links:

      http://harpers.org/archive/2006/06/0081057 has an article, from a respectable magazine, in which the author slobbers over himself fantasizing about assassinating Bush.

      Or how about http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13374-2004Jun28.html? The published Novella "Checkpoint" is about two men discussing their desire to assassinate the president.

      Or how about http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621? Which shows dozens of people openly calling calling for Bush's murder. But don't try to find those signs on CNN/MSNBC/etc, they feel that such things are merely a distraction.

      And of course Craig Kilborn running jokes about killing Bush, plays were produced about it, etc.

      So as you can see, things got a little hot over the past couple years. I could go on, but I think you get the idea. Just trying to fill you in.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shiloh (September 19, 2009 8:11 pm ET)
         
      It's amazing Eric Boehlert didn't do his homework before posting this trash...first Lee Harvey Oswald was a communist look it up or here I will even provide a link so you won't have to strain. http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/oswald.htm
      I believe you are the one that is woefully naive. You close your eyes to all the left wing violence to Peaceful Protesters because we disagree with the Presidents policies...and because we do you say we are racist...that card has been played out. That is the response of a failing argument. As for those that don't know an America Flag flown upside down is the International sign of distress...not like left wing protesters that BURN MY FLAG. I think if there is anyone trying to incite violence it is this article. There are extremists on both sides unfortunatly it is not depicted here. With the exception of the writer.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by toombsie (September 19, 2009 8:49 pm ET)
         
      To be fair Boehlart, the CIA killed John Kennedy. But there is plenty of other examples of "right-wing hatred" fueling assassinations.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by s3v3rus (September 19, 2009 10:53 pm ET)
           
        Such as?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by tuersm3856 (September 20, 2009 7:08 am ET)
          1
        If you're into labeling everything as "right-wing" and "left wing", I'd say "left wingers" have generally killed A LOT MORE PEOPLE in history than "right wingers."
        Report Abuse
      • Author by dencal263474 (September 20, 2009 9:14 am ET)
           
        Oswald subsequently made membership inquiries to such organizations as the Socialist Workers Party, the Socialist Labor Party, The Gus Hall-Benjamin Davis Defense Committee, the Daily Worker, The Fair Play for Cuba Committee and the Communist Party, USA— correspondence that brought him under surveillance by the FBI,
        Report Abuse
    • Author by richard mcenroe (September 19, 2009 9:01 pm ET)
         
      one small problem with his theory:

      Leftist Puerto Rican nationalists (Truman)
      Lee Harvey Oswald (JFK): Communist
      Sirhan Sirhan (RFK): Arab PLO supporter
      Arthur Bremer (Wallace): schizo who stalked Wallace and Nixon
      Squeaky Fromme (Ford): Manson Hippie chick
      Sarah Jane Moore (Ford): Manson Hippie chick
      Carter: um, nobody?
      John Hinckley, Jr. (Reagan): Saw Taxi Driver 15 times, developed obsession with Jodie Foster and determined to shoot Reagan to make an impression, as Bremer, the inspiration for Taxi Driver, had.
      Bush 41: Nobody
      Clinton: Nobody. Francisco Martin Duran fired on the White House, claiming to be destroying an 'alien mist'.
      Bush 43: Nobody.
      Obama: Nobody.

      Frankly, rightwing crazies are way behind the curve. Leftists and lunatics, though, or as we like to call them, Obama's base, are pretty clearly a hazard to the public weal...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bobdog (September 19, 2009 9:06 pm ET)
         
      So, let me get this straight. If I have summarized your comments accurately,

      1. Some Republican leaders (and their media-mouthpiece overlords) want the President of the United States to be assassinated?

      2. Some Religious extremist leaders want our president to be assassinated?

      3. The liars and the racists in the Republican party want our president to be assassinated?

      4. Some Republican leaders are covering for those people like beck and limbaugh who are skirting with fomenting violence?

      5. Some extreme Christian pastors of the religious right want our president to be assassinated?

      6. A fringe lunatic wants our president to be assassinated?

      7. Right wing pundits are deliberately FOMENTING hatred?

      8. "Over the top rhetoric from the right wing and financed by some of the richest people in the US. It is even worse today due to the coporate oligarchy in media : 5 companies control virtually everything you see hear and read."

      9. Some nut out there is going to do something stupid and that stupidity will lay right at the feet of the Republican party allowing all the hate, smears, and BS to go on non-stop?

      10 Republican leaders & politicians are well aware of where their insinuations, etc will lead. It's just that they are just evil, evil monsters? (I think I got that right.)

      11. The likes of Rush (Limbaugh) and Glenn (Beck), as they enrich themselves by encouraging hate... It is as inevitable as the violence I fear is close at hand.

      12. "America's most famous bouts of political violence (i.e. JFK, Oklahoma City, etc.) have always been accompanied by waves of radical, right-wing rhetoric?"

      But then on reflection, I rejoice to hear the voice of reason:

      "We welcome dissenting viewpoints. We think it's not only healthy, but vital to a functioning democracy."

      Then again,

      "Great points. They are however, points the author and most posters here have no interest in."

      I guess y'all are right. These threats should be taken seriously. All those people mentioned above in your own posts should not be walking around in public. They should be immediately arrested and...o god! dare I say, tortured to find out . It's the only reasonable thing to do, right?

      (Exit, drawing circles in the air around my right ear...)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by The Reasonable Man (September 19, 2009 9:25 pm ET)
         
      Can't believe this hasn't been fleshed out. The retired general referenced by Kashner is Edwin Walker. Oswald tried to kill Edwin Walker just a few months before he killed Kennedy. The analogy fails and this article is pure BS.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by TheMadKingII (September 19, 2009 9:40 pm ET)
         
      Lee Harvey Oswald was a Communist sympathizer.

      Sirhan Sirhan was vehemently anti-Israel, a longtime Lefty position.

      Dutch Prime Minister Pim Fortuyn was assassinated by Volkert van de Graaf, a militant animal rights activist.

      Daniel Andreas San Diego, of the Animal Liberation Front, is the only domestic terrorist currently on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted list.

      Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn and all the rest of the Weather Underground psychos bombed the US Capitol, murdered a number of people (three in a Brinks robbery alone) and were also on the FBI's Most Wanted list.

      Is it severely doubtful that a conservative bombed the Times Square Army recruiting station last year. That's Code Pink territory.

      No conservatives are wearing KILL OBAMA tee shirts. How many of you lefties wore KILL BUSH tee shirts? Or were so fascinated with assassinating the President it became an entire subculture in books, films, art exhibits, even merchandising?

      Let's not forget that anti-abortion protester recently shot dead.

      This is a clear case of left-wing projection. The only violence that has taken place at town hall meetings is by the SEIU Purpleshirts who were bused in to do just that.

      Noise is not violence, however loud. You Lefties were total tinfoil off-the-wall political maniacs for eight straight years under Bush. Given articles like this, it seems that hasn't changed. But current left wing overreaching, irrational radicalism and surreal and Pravda-like posts like this are exactly what are going to drive the American Left out of power for all time. The American people know who you really are now: petty tyrants who are demonizing dissenting Americans no less than Ahmie and Khamie demonized the Green protesters.

      In short, keep up the boffo work, guys! I'll repost articles like this next October to remind people exactly who is running the show, and who needs to be run out. Cheers!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tuersm3856 (September 20, 2009 7:00 am ET)
         
      Kennedy was threatening to abolish the Federal Reserve and dissolve the CIA...these are things that the "teapartiers" would support...and the reason, many historians believe, that Kennedy was assassinated.

      If, God forbid, the president is assassinated, they'll use a "right wing wacko" as a patsy and an excuse to crack down on dissidents. In reality, the only people who can get that close to the president these days are black ops groups within the government itself.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dencal263474 (September 20, 2009 8:37 am ET)
           
        Kennedy was escalating the War in Vietnam and planned to overthrow Castro in Cuba. Who would be angry at attacking Castro? Same left wingers who praise him now.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dencal263474 (September 20, 2009 8:23 am ET)
         
      Lee Harvey Oswald was as Left Wing as it gets even moving to the Soviet Left Wing " Utopia". Perhaps the author thinks Oliver Stones JFK was based on facts. Even Stone admits his film was fantasy.

      Articles like these are reckless and ignorant do nothing but generate hate in America.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MikeMcK (September 20, 2009 10:54 am ET)
         
      Yeah, Lee Harvey Oswald was well known for his right wing political views.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by George Bruce (September 20, 2009 2:50 pm ET)
         
      Obviously, it must be repeated time and time again that Kennedy's assassin was a leftist. This is like trying to teach a dog. The instruction needs to be repeated many times before it "takes."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jaybear (September 20, 2009 11:13 pm ET)
         
      this is sick, embarrassing so-called "journalism"....it's designed to do nothing more than stir up the stereotypes and hatred of any who oppose "the one". What's the next step in the Democrat playbook? gin up a "rodney king" incident and burn a couple of cities in the ensuing riots? Just so you can have pictures of the destruction that the "heated rhetoric" has sparked? given the lefts penchant to do ANYTHING to ensure their power I wouldn't be surprised to see that come to fruition right before the 2010 election.

      oh and by the way, if all you leftist haters did a little homework you would know that Lee Harvey Oswald was an avowed Communist and strong Castro supporter....hardly a right winger. But you don't care about a little thing like facts do you? it doesn't conform to your skewed propaganda and true hate speech. You're fanning the flames of serious civil unrest with your careless accusations and bigoted analogies, the ensuing blood will be on your hands not ours.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Grabski (September 21, 2009 6:58 am ET)
         
      Fact: Pres. Kennedy was killed by a leftist. This story doesn't hold together. Fact: The story about the fourth grade class cheering b/c of Kennedy's death is a long ago debunked fake. The children did cheer, after they heard they were being let out of school early.

      Gee, is this the best that Media Matters can do to support the official line?
      Report Abuse