BREAKING NEWS: RedState.com can read Obama's mind!
September 22, 2009 11:25 am ET by Eric Boehlert
Is there any supernatural power right-wing bloggers don't process?
Check out Erick Erickson's "exclusive" at RedState where he claims he can pretty much prove Obama was lying when he said over the weekend that he wasn't paying much attention to the right-wing's beloved ACORN caper. How does crack journalist Erickson go about proving that Obama has been paying attention? Easy, Erickson lists all the connections, real and imagined, between ACORN and Obama. Even more amazing, after rifling through the ACORN CEO's private contact list, he reports she has phone numbers for staffers who work at the White House! I mean, how many other people in Washington, D.C. can say that?
Well, actually hundreds if not thousands can say that, but you get the idea....
RedState's bottom line: It can just sense that Obama's been following the ACORN story closely. Of course, RedState doesn't have any actual proof. It can't quote anybody who's had detailed discussion with Obama about ACORN in recent days. It doesn't have access to White House memos which indicate a huge interest from Obama in the story. But RedState can just tell. It can feel that Obama is lying.
I knew Obama's dismissive comment regarding ACORN on Sunday would drive the right-wing to distraction. (i.e. “Frankly, it’s not really something I’ve followed closely. I didn’t even know that ACORN was getting a whole lot of federal money.”) I just didn't think folks like Erickson would resort to using supernatural powers (and lifted contact list info) to crack the case. I didn't think right-wing bloggers would claim they could read Obama's mind and definitively claim that the POTUS has been following the ACORN story closely.
Then again, I always underestimate bloggers like Erickson.
UPDATED: RedState's whiff simply highlights how, without eye-catching hidden camera video to rally around, the conservative attempt to turn ACORN into a blockbuster story about a sprawling Evil Empire just isn't going to have much staying power. Especially with crack "reporters" like Erickson flogging it. (Reminder: He took somebody's private phone/email contact list and posted it as an "exclusive." Disgraceful.)
UPDATED: RedState responds. Warning: It's almost too dumb for words.
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts
Contrary to media hype, Sarah Palin is very unpopular
Whoa, Eric, you forgot the "-pot".
What the "liberal" media needs is a little distraction, to distract Fox News, so real work can get done.
Precisely. Because this is how you deal with whiny, petulant children: by ignoring them. By at the very least pretending not to notice the gigantic fuss they are making over nothing at all.
That they would redouble their infantile tantrums, such as being able to read the mind of other people, just goes to show how little actual substance there is to this. Let it blow over. We are going to pass a public option!
"Frankly, it’s not really something I’ve followed closely"??
It was Bush talking about Bin Laden. I sooooo remember how tight the panties of the Republicans were when they heard that!!
I mean, shoot, he was only the mastermind who engineered the slaughter of 3000 Americans, not something really important like the shenanigans of a community organization.
They just wanna clear the way for the industrial war complex and big business by claiming all politicians are false prophets or corrupt.
This topic is a very good illustration of the far-right wing mind that is the audience for Fox and talk radio, and why it's so difficult to have a conversation with them..
The story here is that the media is all over a manufactured non-story they're using as a distraction, and that they're trying to link this non-story to Obama.
The wingnut posters are all discussing the intricate details of the non-story.They really think ACORN is the story.
BTW, very smooth tactic there.First line- off topic, second line "speaking of which...".
Carter never said that. The statements by Carter that you're talking about were made more than a week ago. I could understand conservatives being confused the first time they heard the comments. Carter doesn't speak at an elementary school level like Rush or Hannity, sometimes speaking in sentences that contain commas.
There's no excuse for still being confused about this more than a week after the fact.
How am I getting that confused again?
Does A=B?
Does A=C?
To your credit, you did pick up on the "vast majority" part, so you're ahead of those who think Carter said "everybody" who opposes Obama is racist.
Carter, however, used two levels of clarification to emphasize that his opinion wasn't about all opposition to Obama.
1. The "intensely demonstrated animosity", which is the loudest, most hateful opposition, a portion of all opposition..
2. The "overwhelming portion", yet another,smaller part of #1, which is a subset of all opposition.