Thank goodness Howard Kurtz is on the job
September 23, 2009 9:13 am ET by Jamison Foser
Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz, Monday:
Howard Kurtz: The Washington Times is far more balanced since John Solomon took over last year. (Solomon came from The Post, as did its new White House correspondent, Matthew Mosk, and a top editor, Jeff Birnbaum.) In its previous two decades, the Times front-page often resembled a right-wing bulletin board, and its previous editor told me he regarded it as a conservative newspaper.
The Washington Times, today:
The Washington Times has launched TheConservatives.com, a Web site with technology that allows activists to talk up to ideological and party leaders and interact in innovative ways.
TheConservatives.com - a joint online media venture from The Washington Times and the Heritage Foundation - is a tool to "reinvent the right" and help move the public discourse.
"TheConservatives.com creates a cutting-edge new marriage between the social publishing world of bloggers and the social networking world of Twitter, YouTube and the like," said John Solomon, executive editor and vice president for content of The Times. "Most opinion sites today enable thought-leaders to talk down to the masses, but TheConservatives.com empowers users to change the direction of that dialogue, allowing the Joe the Plumbers of the world to speak up to major thinkers, like Newt Gingrich."
UPDATE: I should have included this, from the Washington Times article: "Mr. Solomon said similar Web sites that would appeal to progressive and moderate online readers are being considered."
Oh, they're being "considered"? That's just super.
If I was trying overcome my newspaper's well-established history of acting as little more than a mouthpiece for the conservative movement, I probably wouldn't start by launching a web site called TheConservatives.com and promising that later, some day, if there's time, we'll think about adding a site for progressives.











Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts
Contrary to media hype, Sarah Palin is very unpopular




If TheConservatives.com accomplishes anything at all, I will be surprised if it amounts to more than furthering nonsense such as death panels and whiny rants about funding for illegal aliens.
I'm beginning to wonder if when 'fair and balanced' is now laid claim to, what people like Kurtz really mean is that, since reality is apparently has a center-left disposition, for anything to be fair and balanced means it needs to lean more than a little right. You know, to balance the liberal reality bias fairly with some of that righty charm that people like Beck and Limbaugh specialize in.
Invest today, for mirth, for girth, and a new/old future/past.
Strange.
Moon, who wants "American style democracy" replaced, doesn't shy from saying what he is doing. His members know what "Father's projects" are about, why can't the American public be in on the ruse?
The paper also serves to bring him influence around the world and it's something to show his followers how powerful he is which helps him keep his thumb on their minds. He funds it all with billions in overseas cash, predominantly coming from Japan(according to the WP's own reporting) and no one talks about that. Japan happens to be where the Unification Church has been found responsible for swindling widows out of hundreds of millions, possibly billions, of dollars. The claims against the UC have now topped one billion USD. Those fighting the cases say that figure represents less than one tenth of the damages to the citizens of Japan. The claims have now topped 30,000.
Read the ugly story of how the UC makes some of cash it uses to fund its activities in the USA here.
This is what the WT's first editor said about the Moon organization, I strongly suggest Mr. Kurtz and anyone who "thinks" they know the purpose of Moon's media to watch this video:
More on Heritage and Moon from an old comment...
Spend some time searching for Nile Gardiner, who is a fellow at the Heritage Foundation and has written for many right wing publications including the National Review. Gardiner, is now blogging from across the pond for the London Daily Torygraph but is still widely quoted by the right here. Go ahead, do a news google on his name. Gardiner is a Brit and an excessively rabid right wing Obama hater who also regularly writes about the huge "successes" of Bush and Cheney.
The right loves him because he is a foreigner and it makes them feel validated to see him agree with them. They don't have a clue who Gardiner is or what likely drives him.
One would think that when Gardiner was writing a front page article for the National Review about how horrible the UN was, he would mention that as second generation follower of Moons, Gardiner's "religion" and "messiah" ordered that the "U.N. must be annihilated" so the Moon organization can "remake" it into Moon's vision.
Moon's front groups are working to get the UN to add a theocratic body/mechanism to its structure as part of his plan to theocratize the planet in his role as the "messiah." Don't laugh, the idea is still moving along at the UN and if he fails at that he has a back up plan.)
It is, of course, understandable that Gardiner would give blind allegiance to the Bush family since 41 and Neil travel the world honoring and promoting Moon's "messianic" mission.