Journalists possess free will
September 23, 2009 9:32 am ET by Jamison Foser
Here's how Time's Amy Sullivan opens a Swampland post:
I don't want to write about John Edwards.
Yes, she does. Here's how I know Sullivan wants to write about John Edwards: I'm reading a blog post she wrote about John Edwards.
Sullivan:
And yet here we are, nearly two years after the National Enquirer first reported he had an affair with a then-unnamed campaign staffer, and Edwards is still managing to keep his private screw-up in the headlines. According to the latest reports, the former Democratic politician is maybe, kinda, sorta considering publicly admitting that he is the father of Rielle Hunter's young daughter.
John Edwards isn't keeping his screw-up in the headlines. Politicians don't write headlines. Journalists write headlines. Now, you can certainly argue that speculation that a former Democratic party Vice Presidential nominee is "maybe, kinda, sorta" considering admitting paternity is newsworthy. But Sullivan doesn't want to do that. She wants to write about John Edwards and pretend that it isn't her choice; that John Edwards is forcing her to by ... Well, by not doing much of anything at the moment.
Bull. Sullivan chose to write about Edwards.











The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles




John Edwards is not doing this. He almost certainly didn't tell his aide to write a book, nor tell the publishing company to leak the outline. But this person says that Edwards is keeping his private (?) scandal in the headlines?
All this due to a nasty nitrogen addiction I'm sure.
I don't hate the rutabeggas, I just don't think there is a need to listen to them. Except by consenting professional vegtable theapists.
But of course, they LOVE to write about John Edwards for some reason.