Ethnic stereotypes abound in Beck's immigration timeline
September 24, 2009 2:44 pm ET by Simon Maloy
The chapter in Beck's new book, Arguing with Idiots, that deals with illegal immigration is really something to behold. Subtitled "The chapter Americans just won't write," it's little more than 18 pages of Mexico-bashing that have been peppered with little insets that parody NBC's "The More You Know" public service announcements. In these insets, the familiar shooting star of the NBC graphic has been replaced with a cartoon sombrero:

You start to think that Beck's only understanding of Mexican culture comes from Speedy Gonzales.
Anyway, the immigration timeline is the real star of the chapter, as it features cartoonish Mexicans wearing sombreros and absurdly thick mustaches, and a cartoon of a Chinese takeout container that's meant to represent -- you guessed it -- Chinese immigrants:

It's amusing that Beck, right above the timeline, writes that what "will get you labeled an intolerant xenophobe the fastest" is pointing out that the vast majority of undocumented immigrants to the U.S. are Mexican. Faster than stuffing your book with sombrero-clad Mexicans and other ethnic stereotypes, it would appear.

















http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Space/story?id=8399026
You don't get to vilify unions on one hand and use them with the other to prop up some kind of racist rant.
Glennn's been crying about labor unions for years and now he's using The National Border Control Council as a source.
And I liked the way this moron worked in the bit about how if only .0001 percent of the illegals from Mexico want to do the nation harm...
Is there any evidence that any illegal immigrants from Mexico have any links to groups that could be considered terrorist in nature?
I'm willing to bet that there are many illegals here who are white with ties to the European terrorist organizations.
But then Glennn or Lou aren't interested in hounding white people.
I feel dumber for having read that. Whats more I think you guys might believe your own BS.
Everyone who works and contributes should be considered belonging at a certain level. Of course some profit nicely from having access to those who are "worth less"
I don't know how that paragraph ends, but what is "ironic" about that?