About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Former Star Tribune reporter Black criticizes "friend and former colleague" Kersten's Franken-ACORN column

October 01, 2009 8:02 am ET by Media Matters staff

From a September 30 post on former Minneapolis Star Tribune reporter Eric Black's MinnPost blog:

My friend and former colleague Katherine Kersten connected a few non-existing dots in a Sunday Strib column to imply that the demonic ACORN may have stolen the 2008 MN Sen. election for Al Franken. She offers precisely zero particles of evidence that any improper act by ACORN resulted a single improper vote for Franken being counted, or even rejected. Of course, she didn't say that such a thing occurs, she merely puts together facts from other states, the current ACORN embarrassments in other states, notes that ACORN was active in voter registration in Minnesota, that ACORN supported both Franken and Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, and concludes with a question:

"Did ACORN folks pull some fast ones to help get their favorite son Franken elected - a win that handed Democrats the 60-vote, veto-proof majority that they needed to enact their liberal agenda?"

She does not note, as basic fairness might have required, that despite the enormous scrutiny given to the Minnesota election, neither Norm Coleman nor any of his attorneys ever alleged that such a thing had occurred and in fact specified to the Supreme Court that it was making no allegation of fraud in the election.

As I've written before, the lack of any evidence of fraud, or even attempted fraud, in this excruciatingly close, highly scrutinized election is something of which Minnesota should be proud.

Previously:

Conservative media raise ACORN bogeyman to baselessly cast doubt on Franken's campaign victory

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by The_Cat (October 01, 2009 9:55 am ET)
         
      This kind of criticism of Franken, like that of our President, has much more to do with the outcome than with the process. It is a very safe bet that this piece would never have been conceived, let alone written, had Coleman won the election. He lost, and after he realized he had no hope in court, admitted defeat. I think he should have done so sooner, but that's just opinion.

      Claiming to love America while casting doubt on its electoral process with baseless attacks as Kersten does here, or, like Karl Rove, actively seeking to destroy that process, makes you a liar.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Conchobhar (October 01, 2009 11:14 am ET)
      1  
      The woman is, at best, sloppy. At worst, she's a wingnut propagandist. Either way, she'd fail a basic Civics course. A "60-vote majority," is not "veto-proof." According to Article 1, Section 7 of the Constitution, it takes a two-thirds majority of each House to override a veto. In the case of the 100-member Senate that would be...well, you do the math. It ain't 60.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.