About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Jennings witch hunt too sleazy for Beck?

October 02, 2009 3:23 pm ET by Matt Gertz

For the past few weeks, the Fox News smear machine has turned its attention to attacking Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools director Kevin Jennings, with the network’s fact-free screeds reaching a fever pitch over the past few days. But one voice has been strangely absent from Fox’s choir: Glenn Beck.

Beck, of course, has led the charge in Fox’s previous assaults on Obama administration personnel. He has been widely credited with the resignations of White House green jobs adviser Van Jones and National Endowment of the Arts communications director Yosi Sergant, and has led a smear campaign against administration appointees whom Beck has lumped into the category of “czar,” even writing to followers of his Twitter page "Find everything you can on Cass Sunstein, Mark Lloyd and Carol Browner." And yet, as his colleagues at Fox have lined up to smear Jennings, Beck has been nowhere to be found – in fact, a Nexis search indicates that Beck has NEVER mentioned Jennings on his Fox News program.

Instead, it is Sean Hannity who has stepped up to lead Fox’s attacks on Jennings. On September 30, Hannity claimed (citing a Washington Times report) that Jennings covered up a "statutory rape"  -- in spite of the evidence the individual involved was at the legal age of consent. Based on this faulty premise, Hannity said he wanted Jennings “fired.” This led Greg Sargent and my colleague Jamison Foser to ask whether Hannity was jealous of all the attention Beck has been getting and was viciously smearing Jennings to get the spotlight.

Last night, Hannity devoted much of his program to attacking Jennings, and, in the ultimate “Look at me, look at me” moment, Hannity announced the following “late breaking development”:

HANNITY: And there is another late-breaking development tonight. In 1999 Jennings wrote the foreword to a book called "Queering Elementary Education." And I promise you, America, I'm not making this up. Guess who wrote a blurb for the back of the book praising it as, quote, "An important contribution to nourishing the ethical heart of teaching."

You guessed it, our old friend, Bill Ayers.

So with all these new details about Jennings, will he be the next official from team Obama to now have to call it quits?

Education expert Kevin Jennings wrote the forward to a book about education, and education expert William Ayers wrote a blurb for the back. To Hannity, that’s a huge story. To everyone else – especially those that read the book’s forward, in which Jennings controversially called for valuing "every human being as a precious gift" and looked forward to the day when students could "walk down our streets without fear” -- it’s a sad commentary on Hannity’s obsession with Ayers and his need for attention.

But while Hannity is having an on-air mid-life crisis over Jennings, Beck has yet to mention the man’s name. The carnival music is playing, but the self-described “rodeo clown” isn’t responding to his cue. Is it possible that Beck has decided that this smear is so sleazy even he won’t touch it? And if so, what could that possibly say about Hannity’s own standards?

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by all your eyes (October 02, 2009 3:43 pm ET)
      2  
      Or is it that Beck doesn't want to go on air with homophobic rants, because he's got a little secret?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Midnight Kevin (October 03, 2009 11:52 am ET)
           
        I'm thinking it is a strategy...

        If he lays off an administration corruption or character attack, and allows one of his other Fox friends to take it, he can focus on bashing something else, like Olympics or school indoctrinations or moms,

        Or...

        He wants to try and push his book sales, so he is avoiding any "gay" or "racist" type arguments... after all, he had mentioned his book on his show, and he has been talking with and about moms a lot, so maybe if he keeps pushing the mom content, his book sales will rise...

        -----------------------------
        The Midnight Review
        Mum Is The Word
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (October 02, 2009 3:51 pm ET)
      7  
      I smell an off-camera deal between Beck and Hannity over hunting grounds.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by EZ4you2say (October 02, 2009 4:01 pm ET)
      1 11
      Ok, so now MMFA is complaining that Beck isn't attacking someone.
      You guys are really going over the edge!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (October 02, 2009 4:35 pm ET)
        7  
        Media Matters isn't "complaining" that Beck isn't attacking anyone. Are you really that dense?

        Media Matters is just wondering why the King of Smear (Beck)has been on the sidelines for this smear?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by PurpleState (October 03, 2009 8:52 am ET)
        3  
        Is it complaining? Or is it wisely pointing out a fact that has gone unnoticed?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Midnight Kevin (October 03, 2009 12:04 pm ET)
        2 1
        I agree with you, but at the same time, I find it hypocritical of both your statement and the logic behind Fox News...

        Fox News reports on stuff the "mainstream media", or as Glenn Beck puts it, the "fringe media", supposedly does not, but when they do, they get attacked for not doing it enough or sooner.

        Based on the Fox News reasoning behind bashing, it raises the question as to what makes this different?
        --------------------------------
        The Midnight Review
        Mum Is The Word
        Report Abuse
    • Author by EZ4you2say (October 02, 2009 4:06 pm ET)
      2 7
      Education expert Bill Ayers?
      What a joke.

      A guy that used to blow up buildings is now called an "Education Expert" What does that make Timoth McVeigh? (besides dead)
      I guess if he's so smart, he should have taught his girlfiend how to make that bomb.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by all your eyes (October 02, 2009 4:13 pm ET)
        7 1
        You see how well the Ayers meme worked in November 2008? Do you really think it will work any better in 2010? Please, STFU.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by newzhound (October 02, 2009 5:58 pm ET)
        3  
        Would that be white, ex-US military, Christian Timothy McVeigh?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Midnight Kevin (October 03, 2009 12:08 pm ET)
        2  
        I have books about Hitler with forewords and jacket comments by prominent individuals, but they are by no means a connection to the subject, or to each other...

        ---------------
        The Midnight Review
        Mum Is The Word
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Ruby (October 03, 2009 1:15 pm ET)
        5  
        Bill Ayers is an education expert. Ayers has accomplished more in the field of education than you can probably hope to accomplish in any way in your entire life.

        Timothy McVeigh, the quintessential right wing terrorist, killed 168 innocent people, including 19 children. Bill Ayers, the quintessential left wing terrorist, has killed no one.

        Also, interesting tidbit, a precipitating factor in the weathermen deciding to go underground and take up armed struggle, was the assasination of Fred Hampton. Fred Hampton was 21 years old, head of the Chicago chapter of the black panther party, and responsible during his leadership for negotiating a pact of nonaggression amongst some of Chicago's most notoriously violent street gangs, establishing a free breakfast program in poor areas of Chicago, teaching political education classes, etc. The FBI wanted him dead, and they got their way. Fred Hampton was shot point blank in the head as he lay sleeping in bed, in an assasination carried out by Chicago PD and orchestrated by the FBI. The United States Government murdered an innocent man simply because they didn't like his ideas. (For the record, the first riot for which the weathermen claimed responsibility, was loudly condemned by Hampton, who didn't support that kind of violence).

        Ever wonder why Bill Ayers and co. never did any serious jail time? Because it came to light that the government was breaking more laws than Bill and co. ever did. The FBI was targeting for extermination any and all prominent members of the left, including Fred Hampton and Martin Luther King Jr, using all kinds of illegal tactics and promoting political assasination.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by John Paradox (October 03, 2009 4:47 pm ET)
             
          The mention of the Black Panthers doing free meals is the one activity that I remember without research about how the BPP wasn't just a 'bunch of kooks'.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Dem02020 (October 02, 2009 4:07 pm ET)
      3 1
      Rev. Wright, Wright, Wright... Bill Ayers, Ayers, Ayers... Van Jones, Jones, Jones... ACORN, ACORN, ACORN... and now Kevin Jennings, Jennings, Jennings.

      Who among us had the slightest indication upfront, that so much of the time and effort we had planned to devote to supporting President Obama, would ultimately be wasted defending him from the names Wright Ayers Jones ACORN Jennings and who knows who's next on the hit list...

      Who knew this was going to be any part of our public political discourse, let alone that it would be what seems to be the greater part of it... who knew this ahead of time?

      Not me.

      I'm one of those idiots who thought I and we would be discussing Public Health Insurance (or otherwise reducing the extraordinary costs we pay for health care and private health insurance), and Afghanistan, and regulating the banks and other financial services companies (Wall Street), and Congressional ethics and how to tear our Congress away from the influence of corporate money that they are so in love with, and many other important national policy issues confronting us...

      I'm also one of those blissful idiots who was (and still would be) blissfully unaware of who Wright and Ayers and Jones and ACORN and Jennings are, had not our wicked and corrupted Republican media made those names the topic of discourse in that media, and drawn us off to defending those names, and distracted us from better more positive and constructive policy discourse.

      What an absolute bore and bummer political discourse has become, in our corrupted private broadcast media.

      It's enough to make people turn it off and tune it out, which I think might even be the purpose of it all.

      It's enough to disaffect people politically, disaffect and alienate them from our Democratic process in general, and from our support for the Obama administration and Democrats in Congress in particular.

      And if that happens (and it is happening), then you know who wins don't you?

      That's right, Republicans win is what happens... Republicans win Congressional seats in 2010, and maybe recapture the administration of our federal government in 2012, that's what happens.

      The terrorists win is what happens.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by amfposter (October 02, 2009 5:11 pm ET)
        4  
        "I'm one of those idiots who thought I and we would be discussing Public Health Insurance ... and many other important national policy issues confronting us..."
        I'm one of those idiots, too! Last November after Obama won the election I was armed and ready for any and all intellectual discourse on how to take our country forward, at last. But dealing with the Republican loony fringe media is like having one of those nightmarish neighbors that make living in your peaceful environment hell. No amount of reasoning or logic can penetrate their insidious drive to warp, confuse and destroy. We need to keep pushing back at the nutjobs, boycott when necessary and openly congratulate people who stand up and speak the truth like Congressman Grayson from Florida.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Dem02020 (October 03, 2009 12:13 am ET)
          2  
          We should more than boycott when necessary, we should boycott always, just to keep politically current and in good consumer shape too; and simply speaking the truth is all the honor or satisfied pride we need; and speaking it well (but maybe not loud) is almost always the most esteem we could ever really want.

          I'd rather we went on offense, and played the best defense there ever was: OFFENSE.

          These Republicans think their chit is iced cream?

          C'mon, give me a break... we have Republican U.S. Senators who've spent their finest hours in Washington DC hoor houses or banging their aides, we have their recently indicted leaders stalling their convictions (like tom delay) by dancing in the face of President Obama media nagged pretended faults, we have George W. Bush and Dick Cheney and for that matter dick armey bob ney and jack abrahmoff and hastert and randall 'duke' cunningham in a Federal pen, not to mention that foley pervert.

          Stop playing defense is what I'd say, and start dictating the public discourse, and when they mention one of yours, you respond by talking the best of policy; but when they back bite you twice, you mention IRAQ and George W. Bush and abrahmoff and ney and you name it, the best defense is always a GOOD OFFENSE.

          The American People are still the same, as when they elected President Obama, and made Democrats a Majority in Congress (in a manner so stunningly historic, I still wonder at it)... everybody's pretty much the same today as they were a mere 11 months ago not even a year.

          Hey, what about Public Health Insurance (like Medicare) at a reasonable Premium for reasonable coverage for all that choose it, how about that?

          Oh yeah, what's going in Afghanistan, nothing to do with U.S. National Security that I know of... yes or no?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by johndeever (October 02, 2009 4:47 pm ET)
         
      soory to be a spelling geek, but you want "foreword" (not "forward") in 2nd-to-last para
      Report Abuse
    • Author by achorn316 (October 03, 2009 1:18 am ET)
      2  
      It's pretty obvious why Beck isnt going after Jennings.

      He's not black.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (October 03, 2009 5:12 am ET)
      2  
      I am assuming this must be a bit of toungue and cheek on MMFA's part. After all you folks are trying to tell me that old Glennie has standards or journalistic integrity.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Be Positive (October 03, 2009 10:53 pm ET)
      1  
      Hannity had to do something because he saw how Beck's rants had taken his ratings above Hannity's!! Didn't he promise to get waterboarded for charity - has that happenned yet??
      Report Abuse