Dobbs website poll question asks if Obama, Gore, Carter, or Arafat "was most deserving of their Novel Peace Prize"
October 09, 2009 2:33 pm ET by Media Matters staff
From LouDobbs.com:
Expand All
Expand 1st Level
Collapse All
No I don't hate peace, just marvel at the morons that morons choose as one's forwarding the cause of peace. Yessir (that's my baby) Arafat as wanting peace? The prize is diminished by the lot listed above and others. This is quite a statement about the political interests being served rather than the cause of peace.
An 'award' given consideration just a few days into someone's term his pretty lame and not serious. And again, an award given to the any of the likes above pretty much demonstrates the incestuousness of leftists throughout the world.
But congrats prez, have a happy with the prize! This is just the kind of award you deserve and other lefties would appreciate.
First, you're conflating the date candidates for the Peace Prize must be submitted with the date they decide which candidate actually will receive the prize. But you know that, you just don't want to admit it. Remember, the last Republican president who won the prize was Teddy Roosevelt, who left the Republican party because it wasn't progressive enough. Neither you (judging by your history of absurd posts) nor your party works for peace, you're interested in power and money. but you know that, too, you just won't admit it.
I'm not sure that I agree with Obama getting the prize, but the Nobel Academy decides who gets it and why, not either of us. Did you even look at their statement? The fact is that we will be cleaning up after the debacle that was the Bush presidency for years, and Obama has already changed the game. Did you listen to his speech about nuclear disarmament? (Before you criticize that, remember that Reagan was in favor of it, too.) Why should anybody listen to the anti-humanitarian, anti-science, anti-critical thinking, pro-pseudoreligious "Christian" extremist Republican party (the same party that said last week that the reason we didn't get the Olympics in Chicago was because they didn't like Obama and this week is saying that Europe worships Obama) Republican party or their apologists?
Obama getting the gift is a tremendous honor. You and the other hatriots can't change that, so you do anything you can do de-legitimize the Peace Prize. How adult of you.
The Nobel Peace Prize hasn't become a joke. The Republican Party, on the other hand....?
Obama has vision and has been an inspiration to many, and it is his vision that has gotten him the prize, and the committee has explained why giving this prize to someone with worthy and laudable aspirations is more valuable than giving it to someone who actually has already accomplished their goals - it's the inspiration to others and the leadership for the world's best interests that's the reason he got the prize.
Obama has promoted peace. You're lying when you say that he hasn't.
Hilarious. It's too bad the Nobel "morons" don't acknowledge moronic humor.
He has reached out to the Muslin world saying the Great Satan is not your enemy while telling them bluntly Americas bond with Israel is unbreakable. He has gotten the nations most friendly and of most economic importance to Iran to tell Iran it's current course will have consequences they are ready to enforce. This isn't just restoring America in the eyes of the world, this is, can I say it, real diplomatic accomplishments with real meaning.
Lest we forget, Peres and Rabin were, yes, Israelis. They make it sound as if Arafat won it alone, and then bludgeon people over the head that he was leader of the PLO, but, when he, and Rabin, and Peres won it, they were making strides to make peace in their region of the world.