About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Getting it backwards

October 13, 2009 12:03 pm ET by Jamison Foser

Washington Post reporter Ed O'Keefe, responding to a reader who asked "what's so complicated about abandoning the 'don't ask, don't tell' practice." 

Ed O'Keefe: It requires a mix of executive and legislative action, and President Obama has said he wants to end it, but wants to make sure the government does so properly. That means a mix of executive actions that he can take and Congressional legislation that will make it law -- meaning his predecessors can't enter office and reverse his executive decisions. 

It also requires a culture shift at the Pentagon, where many current and former officials support DADT's repeal, but others still oppose the idea.

No.  A "culture shift at the Pentagon" is not necessary in order to end Don't Ask, Don't Tell.  A culture shift at the Pentagon may be necessary as a result of ending DADT, but it is not a necessary condition for ending the policy.

The military follows the law, it does not set the law.  O'Keefe's answer suggests the opposite: that civilian leaders cannot enact policy until members of the military agree. That's antithetical to the concept of civilian control over the military.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by themidnightreview.com (October 13, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
      1  
      I did not realize that the military dictates what the law shoould be in this nation. I guess if many in the military felt uncomfortable about serving alongside blacks, they would have to adjust to the idea of integration first...

      ------------------------------------------------
      The Midnight Review
      Mum Is The Word
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (October 13, 2009 12:41 pm ET)
      1  
      All Obama has to do is sign an executive order allowing gays to openly serve in the US Military, and it's done and over with.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ReasonAndResolve (October 13, 2009 12:56 pm ET)
        2  
        However, executive orders can easily be reversed by the next guy in the White House (although it is probably not likely). Congress will have to take action to make it law.

        I am beginning to see the wisdonm of Bill Maher's approach, though. President Obama ought to issue the order just to get the Right to go into seizure and distract them from socialism, nazism and all the other -isms that seem to occupy their tiny minds these days.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by NMFreelancer (October 13, 2009 3:25 pm ET)
         
      Ed O'Keefe must have some kind of thought dyslexia; "That means a mix of executive actions that he can take and Congressional legislation that will make it law -- meaning his predecessors can't enter office and reverse his executive decisions." Ummm, Ed, the successor enters office after his predecessor, not the other way around. Kind of makes it sound like you have only half a clue (though I'm pretty sure you have even less than that).
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.

Weekly Columns

Feed Icon

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace