Where's that "Nobel backlash," Mickey?
October 14, 2009 11:07 am ET by Jamison Foser
Mickey Kaus, Friday: "the possibility for a Nobel backlash seems non-farfetched."
Time magazine, Friday: "Why Winning the Nobel Peace Prize Could Hurt Obama"
Time magazine, Friday: "Obama's Nobel: The Last Thing He Needs"
... And more from Mark Halperin (and Mark Halperin) and Pat Buchanan and ... Well, you get the point.
Gallup, Monday: "Barack Obama appears to have gotten a slight bounce in support after he was announced as the Nobel Peace Prize winner on Friday. His 56% job approval rating for the last two Gallup Daily tracking updates is up from a term-low 50% as recently as last week, and 53% in the three days before the Nobel winner was announced."
Huh. Maybe it turns out that Americans don't hate their president for winning the Nobel Peace Prize. Weird.
(A quick pre-emptive note to commenters: Read that again. I didn't say anything about whether Obama should have won the award. My point is simply that the idea that it was absurd to suggest that winning the award was some sort of disaster for Obama.)











Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts
Contrary to media hype, Sarah Palin is very unpopular




Now he can't send more troops to Afghanistan or bomb Iran.
Don't you see that this paints him into a corner and forces him to renew his call for a Eurocentric subordinate USA?
Sheeeeeesh, it's like you guys don't even try to listen to Fox or something.
On top of that, I have provided links a couple of times and one video late over the weekend about the committee's standards. I also linked to news stories from before Obama got the award describing the perfect recipient - he wasn't even on anyone's radar screen, but when you read the standards and qualifications they had, he fits them very well.