About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Where's that "Nobel backlash," Mickey?

October 14, 2009 11:07 am ET by Jamison Foser

Mickey Kaus, Friday: "the possibility for a Nobel backlash seems non-farfetched."

Time magazine, Friday: "Why Winning the Nobel Peace Prize Could Hurt Obama"

Time magazine, Friday: "Obama's Nobel: The Last Thing He Needs"

... And more from Mark Halperin (and Mark Halperin) and Pat Buchanan and ... Well, you get the point.

Gallup, Monday: "Barack Obama appears to have gotten a slight bounce in support after he was announced as the Nobel Peace Prize winner on Friday. His 56% job approval rating for the last two Gallup Daily tracking updates is up from a term-low 50% as recently as last week, and 53% in the three days before the Nobel winner was announced."

Huh.  Maybe it turns out that Americans don't hate their president for winning the Nobel Peace Prize.  Weird.

(A quick pre-emptive note to commenters: Read that again. I didn't say anything about whether Obama should have won the award.  My point is simply that the idea that it was absurd to suggest that winning the award was some sort of disaster for Obama.)

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by walstib (October 14, 2009 11:26 am ET)
      2  
      Of course it was a disaster for Obama to win!

      Now he can't send more troops to Afghanistan or bomb Iran.

      Don't you see that this paints him into a corner and forces him to renew his call for a Eurocentric subordinate USA?

      Sheeeeeesh, it's like you guys don't even try to listen to Fox or something.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Sharpe (October 14, 2009 1:36 pm ET)
          1
        80 percent of the videos in this website are surrounding FOX. I would think that the people running this website listen to plenty of FOX. In fact, probably far more than any of us actually do. And yet, they have somehow retained the intelligence to not sign on to every piece of pig vomit that is floated by. Its called an education - you go to school long enough, you realize that not everything on tv is true and learn how to discern facts from fiction. It is quite difficult for those that use only FOX news and limbaugh to get their information but those people are clearly intentionally shielding themselves from foreign opinions and seeking out anything that will support what FOX already got them to believe. However, if one were to read lets say the times, the news, the post and watch cnn, cbs and nbc news, they would get a pretty good ideea as to what is actually going on. But you fox news faithful don't care what is really going on - you just wait for the next glen beck show.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by steeve (October 14, 2009 6:28 pm ET)
          1  
          Wow. Are you going to give us the "sarcasm doesn't transfer to the written word" BS, or are you going to get out of here because this blog requires reading ability?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Sharpe (October 14, 2009 1:43 pm ET)
           
        Obama is not forced to let his policies be guided by the peace prize. Even the ones that awarded this to him know that afghanistan is going on and may even escalate. While i don't want Obama to continue this war, I would also be distraught to hear that Obama was letting the prize interfere with the decision-making process in something so important. I really doubt it would influence his decision in the slightest. On the other hand, I also did not think Van Jones past would get him booted from the administration so I guess you never know what will influence the decisions. However, I think that the afghanistan war is slightly more important than van jones' care dont you agree? The peace prize is an honor and America should be thrilled that the world thinks about this country in such a positive light at present that they are encouraging our leaders to continue the course they have mapped out. Regardless of whether Obama deserved it after such little time, I do think it is a very flattering gesture.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Rimmer (October 14, 2009 11:29 am ET)
      1  
      HAHAHA! I love it. Next they'll be saying the worst thing that ever happened to Obama was winning the election. What they really mean is it was bad for them.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (October 14, 2009 11:57 am ET)
      1  
      I think the Nobel Peace Prize committee did a pretty persuasive job of explaining why Obama was perfectly qualified for the job.

      On top of that, I have provided links a couple of times and one video late over the weekend about the committee's standards. I also linked to news stories from before Obama got the award describing the perfect recipient - he wasn't even on anyone's radar screen, but when you read the standards and qualifications they had, he fits them very well.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.

Weekly Columns

Feed Icon