About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Godwin's Law should be renamed Beck's Law

October 14, 2009 9:07 pm ET by Brian Frederick

In recent weeks, Fox News' Glenn Beck has displayed an utterly shameful amount of disrespect toward Jewish people. Yesterday, Beck compared Fox News to Jews during the Holocaust, imploring journalists at other news networks to "[a]sk yourself this question: When they're done with Fox, and you decide to speak out on something. The old, 'First they came for the Jews, and I wasn't Jewish.'" He went on to add: "Do you really think that this man is then not going to turn on you? That you and your little organization is going to cause him any hesitation at all not to take you out?"

The comments quickly made the rounds on the progressive blogosphere and over at MSNBC. But Beck has employed the analogy on his show before. Back in June, referring to the closures of auto dealerships under the bankruptcy deals of GM and Chrysler, Beck declared:

This is fascism. This is what happens when you merge special interests, corporations, and the government. This is what happens. And if people like you don't take a stand...at some point, you know what poem keeps going through my mind is 'First they came for the Jews.' People, all of us are like, well, this news doesn't really affect me. Well, I'm not a bondholder. Well, I'm not in the banking industry. Well, I'm not a big CEO. Well, I'm not on Wall Street. Well, I'm not a car dealer. I'm not an autoworker. Gang, at some point they're going to come for you.

Both Beck's comparisons of Fox News and auto dealers to the Jews are so colossally stupid and absurd that they deserve to be dissected and mocked, but that's probably best done over cocktails at happy hour or by Jon Stewart on Comedy Central's Daily Show. Much more troubling is how frequently he uses Nazi analogies and how offensive they are.

In fact, Beck's use of Nazi analogies occurs so frequently -- and on such a large stage -- that Godwin's Law ought to be renamed in Beck's (dis)honor.

Among Beck's greatest Nazi hits misses:

  • Comparing Obama's call for a "civilian national security force" to "what Hitler did with the SS."
  • Suggesting that health care reform would lead to the sort of eugenics programs undertaken by the Nazis.
  • Saying that he "fear[s] a Reichstag moment," or "another 9/11" which will "turn this machine on, and power will be seized and voices will be silenced."
  • Comparing Obama's statement that he would consider "empathy" in choosing a Supreme Court nominee to Hitler's "empathetic" decision that led to a Nazi euthanasia program.

Beck apparently has no sense that drawing such analogies on a regular basis diminishes the very meaning of the Holocaust and thus the meaning of those who were victimized by it. Has it never occurred to him that his use of these analogies might offend Jews? Or does he just not give a damn?

Huff Post's Sam Stein reported on Wednesday that the use of such analogies by Beck and others has led to "growing alarm among Jewish groups and anti-defamation activists." Anti-Defamation League's Deborah Lauter told Stein that "we are seeing more of it than usual," particularly in the health care debate. "Using a Nazi analogy just to say that your adversaries position on health care is bad," Lauter said." It "demeans the experience of those who died and those who are still around. It is so offensive on so many levels."

Further evidence of Beck's insensitivity toward Jews is his (failed) attempt to encourage his listeners to set aside September 28 - Yom Kippur - as a "day of Fast and Prayer for the Republic." In a September 19 tweet, Beck wrote:

Beck echoed his tweet on his September 21 radio show, which deservedly drew criticism from Jewish groups. Responding to the criticism, Beck stated on his September 22 show:

Today, I'm being ripped apart by some Jewish organization and the Huffington Post is reporting it. Is Glenn so stupid he didn't know that was the day of atonement for Jews? ... No, I just thought it would be a good idea. It could bring people together. And you know, honestly, we don't really have a day of fast and prayer in Christianity. At least my faith doesn't really have a day that you do that, so I figured if they're already doing it, we could just join them. I mean, they're already gonna be miserable on that day. We could all not eat together but do it for the republic. Atone and begin again.

And on his September 23 radio show, Beck still refused to let it go.

This man has no shame. Absolutely none.

It's hard to imagine how he could top comparing his news organization to the victims of the Holocaust and trying to co-opt Judaism's most sacred holy day and turn it into a partisan protest, but knowing Beck, he will.

In the meantime, he will continue to say what he wants about the tenets of national socialism -- at least it's an ethos.

Beck's only motivation appears to be himself.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by rr66byby (October 14, 2009 10:36 pm ET)
        7
      Beck has been right on in his assessment of what would happen to talk shows if government decided who could say what. That would apply to newspapers also. What he stated was not insensitive at all. He was drawing a parallel to what really happened in NAZI GERMANY in the thirties. You people know this. Your just picking at him because he wont go along with the status quo when it comes to politics and what the people working for the administration have in mind for this country. He says whats on his mind and he owes no one an apology for stating facts. WHAT DID YOU PEOPLE LEARN IN SCHOOL. OH I FORGOT, YOU WERE TAUGHT IN A PROGRESSIVE ATMOSPHERE THAT IS UNRELATED TO ANY KIND OF TRUTH.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (October 15, 2009 9:04 am ET)
        4  
        Dude, it's called "Zyprexa." Ask your doctor.

        He says whats on his mind and he owes no one an apology for stating facts.

        Nobody's asking for one, rare as it is that he ever states facts. Paranoid conspiracy theory, racist rambling and outright demonstrable lies on the other hand...

        And where and when did our gov't "[decide] who could say what"? You people are morons. Paranoid nutcases. Someone calling out a lie is not an infringement of your free speech - it's an excersise of theirs!

        ----------------------------------------------------------------------
        Stupid Jackass.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by dnbrn (October 15, 2009 9:26 am ET)
        2  
        Beck is the kid at school that wants to be the center of attention and will do whatever is necessary to achieve that end. He uses his rubber face to convey "I'm such a kidder" in order to get away with inappropriateness, then, to throw everyone off guard, he will rebound with melodrama and fake tears: all this is predictable to the kids who are paying attention and refusing to be sucked in by self-promoting behavior. He is one of those manipulators (Limbaugh calls it "persuasion") who has one goal: to get a lot of money and fame any way he can...he has admitted as much when he was a loud-mouth DJ on the various morning jack-ass shows he was on. He has a mansion worth millions of dollars; he has at least one Italian sports car and lots of other "boy toys", and everyone is talking about him. He has to continue outrageously on in order to maintain his place, and at this necessary pace, will combust. It always happens. More and more he will simply fail to entertain on the playground. No one is picking on him: they are doing exactly as he plans---especially people like you. In a "progressive atmosphere" a person can smell the garbage sooner...you will too, someday, or else just be manipulated forever.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (October 15, 2009 9:49 am ET)
        1  
        >>Beck has been right on in his assessment of what would happen to talk shows if government decided who could say what.>>

        If criticizing the media was fascism you guys wouldn't have been caterwauling about Bush Derangement Syndrome for 8 years.

        >>Your just picking at him because he wont go along with the status quo when it comes to politics and what the people working for the administration have in mind for this country.>>

        No, he's just going along with the status quo of Murdock's empire and other corporate backers of the Republican party. The ones who have merged corporate interests with government policy. And the homeless guy at the bus station says what's on his mind.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 10:25 am ET)
        1  
        The GOVERNMENT hasn't done anything to these shows. The WH stated a fact, Fox is not a "news" network, it is an opinion network and they will treat it as such. They will appear on Fox, but with the understanding that they don't consider it a legitimate news network. It's not. Even their own spokesperson admitted that Beck and the other night-time programs are OPINION programs.

        I'm "picking at him" because his dishonest and hyperbolic program is DANGEROUS propaganda which apparently you believe. I'm glad there aren't that many of you who watch it . . . scary.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jonpin (October 14, 2009 11:13 pm ET)
      4  
      <i>"[W]e don't really have a day of fast and prayer in Christianity"</i>

      Ash Wednesday and Good Friday.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by fawltylogic (October 14, 2009 11:21 pm ET)
           
        Do Mormons celebrate those?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mikelartist (October 15, 2009 7:59 am ET)
             
          I do find it quite humorous that Weepy Glenn is a Mormon. I am sure he violates at least a dozen of their tenets before he even leaves his house in the morning.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (October 15, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
               
            What he does on his own time is not an image I need in my head, thank you!

            ------------------------------------------------------------------
            Bleah!
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Cannonball (October 15, 2009 9:45 am ET)
        1  
        And the Catholics only have the entire Lenten Season, 40 days!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Meremark (October 15, 2009 12:00 am ET)
      3  
      -
      After some Beck rebuke in this blog last week, describing his incessant self-contradiction until it now shows no political principles or precepts at all, I started thinking: that is the schtick, his schtick.

      Confusion. Blabbering (and bawling) incoherently -- he is clinically diagnosable as un-integrated personality -- rejecting one thing he blares with the next thing he blares, seeming to some weak-minded viewers that he is debating (both sides) himself, then they STAY TUNED to see how it comes out, which 'side' wins. And Beck is NEVER going to stand on a principle nor reach a conviction.

      ... because the 'suspense' would end then, and those viewers would tune out.

      - - -

      The old rule of talk radio has been 'conflict' -- always frame topics as conflict and fuel the fighting sides; audience tunes in for conflict, and conflict sustains attention. It's a Limbaugh rule.

      So Beck's schtick is in that context, an update: Confusion. The 'new' rule.


      Report Abuse
    • Author by bostonjerry (October 15, 2009 10:04 am ET)
         
      "In the meantime, he will continue to say what he wants about the tenets of national socialism -- at least it's an ethos."

      F-ing Nihilists man.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by donwelty (October 15, 2009 10:47 am ET)
         
      It may be part of the alcoholism. That does not have any idea what he is saying or how inappropriate it is. But I know alcoholics who say things that are not quite so dumb. Maybe that should go to AA meetings or take a logic class.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by sleepy joe (October 15, 2009 1:18 pm ET)
           
        Beck knows exactly what he's saying and he knows how inappropriate it is. As his ratings continue to rise, we will hear more and more stuff like this - until people start tuning out, which will never happen.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Squeaky Wheels (October 15, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
         
      First they Came for the talk show hosts but they couldn't do anything because the talk show hosts had hours every day to spin the issue their way.

      Then they came for the bankers but they couldn't do anything because the bankers could afford to buy legislation.

      Then they came for the religious leaders but the couldn't do anything because religious leaders potray an attack on them as an attack on all that is holy.

      Then they came for the gun owners but they couldn't do anything because the gun owners have guns.
      Report Abuse